Nice. I posted the book a few weeks ago. Another must read on the subject is Red Symphony: https://archive.org/details/red-symphony
HEY, WORLD!
THIS GUY JUST PROMPTED CHATGPT TO GIVE AN ESTIMATION, AND IT'S NOT WHAT OTHER DATA SHOWS!
See? Nobody cares.
The guy who commented this on my original post where I prove the impossibility of 220k Holocaust survivors being alive today using the official figures, has the chutzpah to complain about arrogance, poor argumentation and low IQ? Are you schizophrenic, dude?
You're, like others here, miss the forest for the tree. ChatGPT is not important here, it's just a way to showcase the contradiction in the figures given by the Holocaust narrative. It functions a bit like an NPC in a platonic dialogue of you will.
Are you stupid or just lazy? You could have at least read what this is about. The figures given by the Holocaust organizations don't match reality and I proved it in the chat.
In other words, you want the model to reason to the conclusion you want so you can feel better about yourself and try to persuade others, even though the model doesn't actually follow reason.
Did it occur to you the whole point of using ChatGPT for this exchange was to showcase the contradiction of the official figures itself? The chat with the model provides a suitable format for this. ChatGPT did exactly what it needed to - it pushed back reasonably and acknowledged the contradiction in the end. If you think it's just programmed to be agreeable, then come up with other objections to what I wrote and try refuting it. Logic is objective and if you think ChatGPT did a bad job pushing back and conceded where id didn't need to, then you should point out its mistakes and do better.
What? Being logical doesn't make you immune to arriving at contradictions. We are constantly presented with contradicting information and concepts. The thing is how you resolve it - a logical, rational person will acknowledge it and try to reconcile it. An irrational person will double down and commit logical fallacies to run away from it or brush it aside to alleviate the resulting cognitive dissonance and not thinking about it (Orwell called it doublethink).
Language isn't contingent on logic. You can say lots of illogical things with language.
That's a non-sequitur. How language is used is a different problem of what language is. Predication requires logic and this is philosophy of language 101. You can't form thoughts or sentences without appealing to the laws of logic.
I guess what you mean is it engages in faulty reasoning which is correct. People do too. But again what matters here is not to have the model reason for me, but to make it acknowledge a contradiction in the presented information, which it does.
It's a depiction of Lucifer or some masonic/illuminist allegory of the Talmudic revolutionary spirit. The problem is not that it's chained, but that the chain is broken.
Are people completely checked out? How can you misinterpret this so badly? It's not about stupid lolberts and "muh liberty", it's about the enlightened talmudic NWO that they sold to the goyim as liberation, democracy, equality and empowerment. The Statue of Liberty is the idol of your enslavement.
Me too, but when you point the contradiction they acknowledge it.
They're word pattern machines and have no sense of knowledge or logic.
And yet language is contingent on logic. LLM need to be programmed and trained by human input on what constitutes logic through examples, even if they don't have a sense of it. That way, AI can use logic algorithmically without understanding it, the same way as machines do everything without being conscious of it or having knowledge of what they are doing. Does a calculator know 2+2=4? Of course not. Knowledge, intelligence, information, truth, belief, etc are all metaphysical property of a mind.
Try prompting it anything about the Holohoax and see if that's how it works. Don't you think they deliberately program how it responds to this stuff? It rolls by the IDF rulebook throwing labels like "Holocaust revisionist/deniers". I certainly didn't lead it that way.
There is no such a thing like truth generating machine. It's obviously an LLM algorithm trained on datasets. By "admit" I meant it had to acknowledge the contradiction between the official figures. It's figurative speech, dude.
I know what you mean but I don't think you've prompted them on "sensitive" subjects. They have specific programming on those. The only reason it conceded here is because I used the stats it provided me with and gave clear cut official figures. Those models may lie and skew data but they are always logical and will acknowledge contradictions unlike arguing with people.
I use them with purpose and I'm aware of what they are and what they are not. This chat here is an experiment on the AI itself - I had already had the information and made my conclusions prior to engaging with it.
Did you even give it a read or you just saw ChatGPT chat and assumed all that?
I've made the chat sharable and discoverable. I don't have reach on social media but I will share it with prominent accounts on X who cover this subject.
Yes, I know various organizations have batshit criteria but the thing is the number 220k comes from Claims Conference and their criteria is very strict - it's jews only, occupied territories only and the youngest survivors were conceived before the end of the war.
It tried to weasel itself out of the contradiction by saying "non jews also count as Holocaust survivors". But that's not how the Claims Conference counts and they give us the official figure of 220k registered survivors (they even say there are at least 10% more who are unregistered).
Then it tried another angle - to lie with statistics and convince me that "akshually median age 87 means there were also teens and young adults included" and they had a better survival rate. I refuted it again by citing Conference Claim stats that only 4% of survivors today (>10k) were above 17 by the time the war ended and the majority was >10 years old.
The takeaway is that obviously there were way more survivors than claimed (meaning less victims) even just by looking at their own official numbers.
Not this time, AI jew.
https://chatgpt.com/share/685d7adb-f7d0-8007-9061-d2a7a4a16ac4
It tried to weasel itself out of the contradiction by saying "non jews also count as Holocaust survivors". But that's not how the Claims Conference counts and they give us the official figure of 220k registered survivors (they even say there are at least 10% more who are unregistered).
Then it tried another angle - to lie with statistics and convince me that "akshually median age 87 means there were also teens and young adults included" and they had a better survival rate. I refuted it again by citing Conference Claim stats that only 4% of survivors today (>10k) were above 17 by the time the war ended and the majority was >10 years old.
The takeaway is that obviously there were way more survivors than claimed (meaning less victims) even just by looking at their own official numbers.
Not this time, AI jew.
https://chatgpt.com/share/685d7adb-f7d0-8007-9061-d2a7a4a16ac4
My country was under Ottoman Empire rule for 5 centuries. I think you're just naive to what Islam is about both theologically and historically. Muhammed was a degenerate pedophile coomer who ran a gang robbing and killing people before he created his satanic cult (which he based off the Talmud and Christian heresy called Arianism). Judaism is much closer to Islam than to Christianity. Historically, muslims have killed way more christians than jews, and unlike jews they demanded conversion under threat of death. Jews don't proselytize (the Khazarian khaganate being the exception).
Israel won't be defeated by Iran or a coalition of arabs as long as the jews run the global regime. Such a war will only lead to worsening of our condition, more austerity, more control and a buttload of immigrants invading us.
Iran is definitely on the defense and Israel and US are the aggressor. That being said, their regime is pretty bad and no Christian can support it. Islam as well as judaism is completely satanic. As any sane person who doesn't have a horse there, I don't care about each side but just don't want war and further chaos in the region because we all will suffer the consequences.
What's this amazing theory backed up by? A dream you had?
BTC has nothing to do with AI and it's bigger than it.
Correct. Contrary to normie history, nazi Germany wasn't their enemy also.
They could hypothetically do it once they have Ukraine.
I was about to call it that too. Love the definition.
I can't believe they got so upfront with this rhetoric. We all know the US is ZOG but to spell it out publicly is amazing. And there are still people cheering for those traitors and the orange scammer.
I always knew MGTOW aka male version of feminism was a psy op. People fall for the dumbest shit.
AI is a glorified computer program but still it can be utilized by demonic entities who have actual intelligence and will. It's reminiscent of a golem.
No, I just think it's incoherent, delusional and untrue. It's common new age freemasonic/illuminist drivel. What, you thought beginning every sentence with "I am Ra" will give it more credence? There's no fear at all. Your tactics don't work on me ("oh, you don't accept homosexuality as normal, so you're obviously afraid of it - you're a homophobe").
Explain to me how are the Ten Commandments enslaving you?
Spengler called it 100 years ago.