1
newfunturistic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Got the gear to analyze graphs during that summer, when I was going at it full time. Had 6, 40 inch monitors.. 3 desktop computers. Couple shelving racks for that. One was smaller, on top of the tower speaker, with the, uh.. what was that.. yeah the crypto bubbles. I had the settings to like 1min intervals and all of binance. So if something jumped up, a bubble would get bigger and it caught my eye on the side, while I was doing things on the main monitor. Worked pretty good. The other monitors were extending like the top 24hrs gainers graphs. Was tiling stacked windows.. so like 4 windows of 6 graphs in each monitor.

The thing with that shit, was.. if you could get 3% a day, you could double your money in a month. Binance didn't charge fuck all to sell.. like let me check what it was. Yeah, 0.1% to get rid of it. You try using other exchanges, it's obscene.

But yeah.. these guys bail out of Canada after government regulations tightened up. Later, in the news, the CEO guy.. this asian who was from the west coast.. gets in legal trouble. Seems like they're doing ok. They got a separate US site.

What I noticed is, if BTC is going down.. the whole market is not doing well.

What was interesting, on binance was these ETF tokens, where it was the inverse.. they toned those down.. let me check how many they have left. How do you even find those.. hang on.

You gotta go to a trading window.. not what they are from the main site. More expanded.. I was using USDT as the currency. They changed the layout a bit here.. I'd go to options and turn sections off. Candlestick shit there as well too many extras in the graph. lol.

ok hang on.. lol.. they're called "Binance Leveraged Tokens".

"Inverse Tokens (e.g., BTCDOWN, ETHDOWN): Binance offers "DOWN" tokens (like BTCDOWN or ETHDOWN) that are designed to go up in value when the underlying cryptocurrency (Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc.) goes down."

So this was cool, man.. Damn.. check this out..

"Binance has ceased support for Binance Leveraged Tokens (BLVTs) and delisted them earlier in 2024.

This means you will no longer find them on the trading window as you used to. Binance made this decision as part of a regular review of its product offerings."

Damn.. they were phasing them out, one at a time. It was the bottom of the valley, eh. That must of been some serious shit they were coughing up. lol.


Anyways.. I think it's a little "sus".. how fucking binance bails out of Canada.. and this shit skyrockets. Meanwhile.. if I was still fucking around with that full time, I wouldn't be in this situation. lol

Also to note here.. thinking back to how graphs looked like in 2013.. you get this hill and a hump.. watch how previous humps behaved. Could be an indicator of what could occur next with what's going on. It's "fractal". You get this camel's hump that first summer, eh.. When you zoom that shit out though later in the future, it'll be like that earlier hill.

Right now, it's the "front of the hill". Like what do you think is gonna go on next, from here.. Is it gonna crap right out and back of the mountain for a couple years, like the usual shit I dealt with.. lol.

What you gotta remember here.. is it wasn't just BTC.. that was the "bellweather". If BTC wasn't doing good.. no crypto tokens were doing well.


Binance leaving canada that fall.. just as this "front of the mountain", shit starts to go on.. "sus". Meanwhile, the founder was from here.

2
newfunturistic 2 points ago +2 / -0

How about Yahweh.. how did he get started. They say, oh, he was always there. I'm asking google gemini AI.. it says:

Uncreated: He was not "born" in the sense of coming into existence at a particular point in time or having a beginning.

Eternal: He exists outside of time, having no start and no end.

Self-existent: His existence is inherent to his nature, not dependent on anything else.


Well.. it had to start from something.

1
newfunturistic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Zoom in on a region. Look at all those little dots.. ok.. how does each one of those fires start. Lightning? I'd say, from lasers on all these satellites that keep going up. Some kind of agenda to burn down all the forests, for whatever reason. lol. Like what's going on here, and "why".

2
newfunturistic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, no kidding.. They probably had that tech, who knows how long ago. That could mean old things you saw on TV, could be like this. I don't know. Maybe they didn't have that tech years ago.

Plus these guys run all the media companies. If you didn't see something with your own eyes, or know somebody who did.. you never know.. maybe it didn't happen. Was just this type of tech, plus the media companies going along with it.

2
newfunturistic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, you gotta wonder, what's gonna be coming up next with all this.

3
newfunturistic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Scrolling down google news US version. See this one.

https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.47UA4WD

Oh, it's the fact check section at the bottom. So now you'll be getting videos, where it's like.. oh, is that real or fake.

4
newfunturistic 4 points ago +4 / -0

"China has launched the world’s first AI-driven hospital, a groundbreaking initiative developed by Tsinghua University researchers.

This facility is staffed by 14 artificial intelligence doctors capable of independently diagnosing, treating, and managing patient care without direct human intervention.

Initial trials have demonstrated the AI doctors’ ability to treat over 3,000 patients daily, suggesting significant potential for improving healthcare efficiency, reducing operational costs, and addressing doctor shortages, particularly in remote and underserved regions."

Then they start injecting you with who knows what.

2
newfunturistic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, just things like the temperature extremes. Do they even have outfits that could withstand it. Just with cars here in -40c, that's probably tough. And all this equipment, did they test it in those temperature conditions out there. Probably, eh. But it sounds like they didn't have to.

3
newfunturistic 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is getting out of hand real fast. Just a few weeks ago, it was all wonked out with who knows what. Check this one out.

"Both the video and sound were created from a single text prompt for each clip using Veo 3 by Google, their latest AI video model. The clips were then edited together just like any regular video. Seriously, whoever is training this model… let them work their magic!

Veo 3 goes beyond the uncanny valley. The motion, sound, physics, and dialogue all look and feel incredibly real."

https://www.instagram.com/p/DKH5V6LNnYy/

1
newfunturistic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah.. no kidding.. so if they've been using this type of tech, who knows when.. Maybe not though. It wouldn't be too long for AI thinking by itself to be like light years ahead, you know what I mean.

But even just this AI doing realistic video tech, if they have had that years ago.. I guess you can't really trust whatever comes from their systems, like "the news". You'd have to see things in person. But then.. what if like videos from others, are also bogus like that. You'd have to know that person in the real world. It starts to get into that type of thing.

2
newfunturistic 2 points ago +2 / -0

That took up a lot of your time. Hang on.. as I'm reading this, going to check that diagram. Man.. that's complex.. ok I'm up to this "here" part, I'll check that. Allright, I'm over at this post. All this stuff is totally complex. Sounds like there's gonna be super trouble though. Doesn't sound like in our lifetime. But who knows. You sure know your stuff though.

2
newfunturistic 2 points ago +2 / -0

So what do you think about this stuff here.. you think that's gonna happen soon? Like when's this supposed to go on. I guess there'd be some "signs", eh. Like what. And then, isn't there some "anti-christ" too.

I looked up this image file I had seasons ago.. Timeline of the book of revelation. 3229 x 1694 pixels.

https://i.imgur.com/KxcwR6I.jpeg

So where are we in that timeline chart.

2
newfunturistic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Starting to check that out.. I'm there.. why's he talking about Laurel Canyon. Then I look up, see Dave McGowan. Jeez.. I read weird scenes inside the canyon, a few years ago. That guy wound up dead not too long after these books, eh. Gonna gradually check this all out now. Wanna see what he has to say about this moon stuff.

1
newfunturistic 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeah I didn't think spark plugs would get this type of setup going. lol.. and I don't know anything about electronics. Deleting that video from my backup drive. lol

2
newfunturistic 2 points ago +2 / -0

ok so I'm reading this Daniel 7. Wasn't sure about looking up stuff when it could be some shenanigan religion. But checking it out here.


DANIEL DESCRIBES HIS VISIONS (7.1—12.13) Daniel's Vision of the Four Beasts 7 In the first year that Belshazzar was king of Babylonia, I had a dream and saw a vision in the night. I wrote the dream down, and this is the record 2 of what I saw that night:

Winds were blowing from all directions and lashing the surface of the ocean. 3 Four huge beasts came up out of the ocean, each one different from the others. 4 The first one looked like a lion, but had wings like an eagle. While I was watching, the wings were torn off. The beast was lifted up and made to stand up straight. And then a human mind was given to it.

5 The second beast looked like a bear standing on its hind legs. It was holding three ribs between its teeth, and a voice said to it, “Go on, eat as much meat as you can!”

6 While I was watching, another beast appeared. It looked like a leopard, but on its back there were four wings, like the wings of a bird, and it had four heads. It had a look of authority about it.

7 As I was watching, a fourth beast appeared. It was powerful, horrible, terrifying. With its huge iron teeth it crushed its victims, and then it trampled on them. Unlike the other beasts, it had ten horns. 8 While I was staring at the horns, I saw a little horn coming up among the others. It tore out three of the horns that were already there. This horn had human eyes and a mouth that was boasting proudly.


Hang on.. some people say it's "symbolic" but when I read about these types of creatures that 'll have an animal head and another animal's body part, that's like the witchcraft beasts. Look up those demons they can be mixed like that. Could be early prototypes that Yahweh was testing out. So.. whatever this guy's describing.. that's just those types.

This is what it's called "In folklore, a chimera is a mythical creature with parts from multiple animals". That's all this stuff is.. even God had some of those going on with his bodyguards. Let me look that up. Remembered those 3 off the top of my head. "cherubim, ophanim, seraphim".

Looking this up, seeing a page but they have an extra besides those.. "The Four Living Creatures".

6 In the center, around the throne, were four living creatures, and they were covered with eyes, in front and in back. 7 The first living creature was like a lion, the second was like an ox, the third had a face like a man, the fourth was like a flying eagle. 8 Each of the four living creatures had six wings and was covered with eyes all around, even under his wings.

Yeah.. so what's so unusual with these beasts this Daniel dude is seeing. It's just more of those early prototypes.

1
newfunturistic 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just watched that video with the Benny Hill song. That sure looks like here on earth, eh? So what does that mean.. they didn't go. Well, why not, right?

1
newfunturistic 1 point ago +1 / -0

How I wound up here.. was checking google news, saw this one:

Technology section. Google's new AI video tool floods internet with real-looking clips

https://www.axios.com/2025/05/23/google-ai-videos-veo-3

Reading that article and they say, "Case in point: In one viral example posted on X, filmmaker and molecular biologist Hashem Al-Ghaili shows a series of short films of AI-generated actors railing against their AI creators and prompts."

I check that link.. an example video on twitter. Check this out. Actors are "done".

Hashem Al-Ghaili @HashemGhaili I did more tests with Google's #Veo3. Imagine if AI characters became aware they were living in a simulation!

https://x.com/HashemGhaili/status/1925332319604257203

That's this video. Posted a couple days ago had 3.8M views.

3
newfunturistic 3 points ago +3 / -0

You do have the knights templar worshipping him though. Like the wiki page of Baphomet.. let me go get that.

"During trials starting in 1307, the Knights Templar were accused of heresy for worshipping Baphomet as a demonic idol."

Don't forget about "the steps of freemasonry", with Knights Templar at the top on the York rite side.

"structure-of-freemasonry-1956-life-magazine"

https://i.imgur.com/Qr4UMqa.jpeg

This post baphomet image was from:

"Éliphas Lévi's iconic image of Baphomet, the "Sabbatic Goat," was first published in 1854". But it sounds like this was going on way back before it. What is this character's deal here.

I talk to Google Gemini AI about it.


baphomet.. he's not one of the 72 demons from the ars goetia. There was also another class of demons. But he wasn't one of those. You have the hierarchy of the demonic realm.. like generals.. this baphomet wasn't in any of these categories


You are absolutely correct. Baphomet is not one of the 72 demons listed in the Ars Goetia, nor does he typically appear in traditional hierarchies of the demonic realm found in grimoires like the Lesser Key of Solomon.

Here's why Baphomet stands apart:

Origin in the Knights Templar Trials: Baphomet first appears in historical records during the trials of the Knights Templar in the early 14th century. Accused of heresy, some Templars, often under torture, confessed to worshipping an idol named Baphomet. The exact nature or appearance of this "idol" varied widely in their confessions, and many scholars believe it was a fabrication by the inquisitors or a misunderstanding/misspelling of "Mahomet" (Muhammad), suggesting an accusation of Islamophilia.

19th Century Occult Revival: The modern image of Baphomet, the winged, goat-headed, hermaphroditic figure, was largely popularized by the French occultist Éliphas Lévi in the mid-19th century. Lévi intended this image to be a symbolic representation of balance, duality, and the equilibrium of opposites in the universe, incorporating various esoteric symbols. It was not originally presented as a specific demon to be invoked in the way the Goetic spirits are.

Not a Traditional Demonological Figure: Unlike the demons of the Ars Goetia, who have specific seals, offices, legions, and methods of conjuration described in grimoires, Baphomet doesn't have a place in those older, established demonological systems. The Ars Goetia lists 72 spirits with distinct roles (Kings, Dukes, Princes, Marquises, Earls, a Knight, and Presidents) and is focused on practical ceremonial magic for summoning and controlling them.

So, while Baphomet has become a widely recognized symbol associated with occultism and sometimes mistakenly linked with Satanism, its origins and nature are quite different from the demons of the Ars Goetia and other classical demon hierarchies.


checking the Dictionnaire infernal from 1863.. it's 748 pages, so it's pretty thick. Baphomet doesn't seem to be listed in there. This  Éliphas Lévi image.. what year was that?


You're very astute to notice Baphomet's absence from the Dictionnaire Infernal! Jacques Auguste Simon Collin de Plancy's Dictionnaire Infernal (which had its final, most comprehensive edition in 1863, the one you're likely referring to) aimed to be a compendium of demons, occult figures, and superstitions. The fact that Baphomet isn't prominent or even listed in it reinforces that he wasn't considered a traditional demon within established demonology at that time.

Éliphas Lévi's iconic image of Baphomet, the "Sabbatic Goat," was first published in 1854 in his influential book, Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie (Doctrine and Ritual of High Magic). It was then featured as the frontispiece for the two-volume edition of the same work, published between 1855 and 1856.

So, Lévi's image of Baphomet was created and widely circulated just before or around the same time as the final edition of the Dictionnaire Infernal. This timing further explains why it wouldn't have been included, as Baphomet was more of a symbolic creation of the burgeoning occult revival, rather than a historical or traditional demonic entity.


There was also when I was checking out the white house, broken pentagram in the DC street layout. The bottom tip point was inside entrance hall. If you'd go in there, look to the right, big mirror. At the top of the border carvings, this goat head guy with the flame on top. Let me get that post.

Just search for: "entrance hall" in here for those research posts.

https://communities.win/search?query=entrance%20hall&community=Conspiracies

But yeah.. where does this character fit in the categorization.. he's not in the hierarchy of hell.

https://www.occult.live/index.php/Hierarchy_of_Hell

Not in the 72 demons of the Ars Goetia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_demons_in_the_Ars_Goetia

I put together an album of the version from the Dictionnaire Infernale, from 1863.. A later illustrations version. And this more realistic one from lately. The 3 beside each other, for each of the 72. Let me get that bookmark.

"Comparing different versions of the 72 Ars Goetia demons"

https://imgur.com/a/49Vm050

So what's these guys deal, compared to the hierarchy of hell, characters .

1 Theological classification of demons 2 The government of Hell 3 Kings of the cardinal directions 4 The Hierarchy 4.1 Kings 4.2 Princes 4.3 Dukes 4.4 Marquises 4.5 Counts 4.6 Knight 4.7 Presidents 5 Nine degrees of diabolical spirits

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›