"unlike the classic carburetor which prepares an air / fuel mixture to burn, burned the gasoline vapors and did not use a carburetor. Where a classic engine takes gasoline from a tank, his system takes the gasoline vapors from the tank leaving the fuel there which is slightly warmed" - Conspiracies

"unlike the classic carburetor which prepares an air / fuel mixture to burn, burned the gasoline vapors and did not use a carburetor. Where a classic engine takes gasoline from a tank, his system takes the gasoline vapors from the tank leaving the fuel there which is slightly warmed" (cdn.videy.co)

posted 252 days ago by newfunturistic 252 days ago by newfunturistic +5 / -0

1 comment

1 comment share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (1)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– newfunturistic [S] 1 point 252 days ago +1 / -0

There's reports about this guy. As if just running on "vapours" would be enough to power an engine. Somebody would have videos of them doing it, if it was possible, right?

He's not on the wikipedia but is in this french version that somebody ran through translator.

https://fr-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Thomas_Ogle?_x_tr_sl=fr&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en

Checking the channel that vid was from. They got another guy.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLiG8ZIi5Bd/

"The Charles Pogue carburetor reportedly achieved 200+ MPG by vaporizing gasoline before combustion, dramatically improving fuel efficiency, but was suppressed and never mass-produced.

Credit: The Why Files"

permalink save report block reply