Looking it up briefly the community seems pretty fascinating and purposefully obscured. What little was translated has an unfortunately weak understanding of emotion. I see no understanding of the underlying mechanism of emotion, which is rooted in the perception of time.
I hope I'm wrong or the translated parts are purposefully deceptive. I would like to be told I'm wrong since I get the possibility to learn.
I don't think I have enough time or background to work through the translation at all.
emotions as temptations in need of resistance by yet another choice of action
yet form projects form into flow, from a present perspective facing the future, without which the form cannot apply intelligence
emotion existing solely from divergent projected flow, due to inadequacies of form
those inadequacies are real, and to abandon them would be to abandon thought itself
Each ONE potential out of ALL potentiality is capable to sustain itself.
yet sustenance itself is not judged, is not valued, is not placed, without projections of form upon flow
All beliefs are based on consenting to suggested information
Well, yes, thus ontology and general metaphysics, due which degree we consciously consent marks a degree of maturity in my opinion, and so the vast majority are ignorant of this topic in entirety.
All these traumas are being mass suggested by the same parasites who industrialized the suggestion of time
I don't understand decoupling time from flow. How do I explore this.
the self destruction of setting oneself above
Yes. Organized religion can teach many concepts through implied consent that would otherwise be impossible for lesser intellects to grasp. You say you struggle with this. It matters not whether it is a limitation of body or soul that prevents, simply accepting that a line is drawn is sufficient. On one side, the capability to break free, on the other, nothing. Perceiving either the capability or the potential as derived from inspiration from ALL? I'm not sure it matters if that is the result.
Doesn't proclaiming "my view on flow" contradict your comprehension of being form within flow?
No, i accept it as universal. There is no conflict for I am either sharing the same belief, or without opinion on the aspects which I do not understand. There is only so much confidence I can have as to whether I understand from the written word, thus the chosen grammatical structure.
Society is being suggested
yes
The way out is comprehension
out? of suggestion, ok, but to? to comprehension of the suggestion? to comprehension of the all? It matters not where reality lies if the soul is satisfied, or does it?
beliefs fell
One by one nearly all tradition, ritual, and habit of the ordinary now feels foreign and distasteful. I can relate to this, and it leads only to a personal journey. Maybe some confluence will make this more rewarding than isolation.
asceticism
Yes, I chose the word precisely for your stated response. I don't get why you ended with the word responsibility... unless you meant it as an appositive for goals.
satisfied
Yes I wrote that sentence to be patronizing and cute. Any goals or expectations I had have been met. If there was a stability contest I'm sure I would qualify. Now I simply am. If I take on any role it is that of a teacher. To that end I sift through information to find truths, and reprocess to find false beliefs.
as a tool
I don't know what I don't know. What I think I want to know that I don't is extremely technical.
I don't have any philosophical or lifestyle questions. The two biggest questions on my mind:
How is acetone metabolized in the body? It appears to be a primary fuel, but literature claims it is a waste product. Energy-producing Ketone shortage in the brain seems to be the cause of childhood myopia.
How did the somatoscope magnify light? Partial description: "Two light sources, one incandescent with a wavelength of 3,300 angstroms, the other ultraviolet of 1,850 angstroms, start pulsating, producing a third wavelength. This wave goes through a monochromator which produces a ray. This ray is exposed to a magnetic field (the Zeemann effect) which splits it into parallel rays. One of these rays is treated by a Kerr cell which increases its frequency. This cell is then stimulated by a step generator-oscillator at frequencies which vary from 250 to 1,200 megahertz. The modulation of a visible light frequency ranging from 250 to 1,200 megahertz produces a basic frequency ranging from 250 to 1,200 megahertz, but also harmonics at a higher frequency (if we use light in the order of 2,000 MHz). ... the resolution of this instrument is in the order of 150 angstroms and the power of its magnification varies from 2,000 to 30,000." (Gaston Naessens)
Gestalt Theory
Emotions themselves rely on a unidirectional flow of time, as an aspect of flow. Engaging with flow is the underlying nature of gestalt theory. You are dismissing this and claiming that the emergence of emotion itself is affixing state. While not fundamentally wrong, it is literally encoded genetically.
Maybe you or I could do such things, however humanity can not. Are you so eager to dismiss humanity? The level you speak at is so firmly disconnected from the human experience. How did you come to be?
You are spending so much time reiterating the same meanings over and over that I am having trouble discerning anything new. I get your view on flow and asceticism. Let's move on. You tell me if I need to accept it as gospel for you to be satisfied.
You aren't wrong, however from my perspective, there is an element of self-selection to classism, which is wholly different from genetics. In this case, the old testament is purely referring to non-'chosen people'.
Separately, the Old Testament and the New Testament are leagues apart for that reason. It is well accepted that Muslim/Jewish tradition is rooted on one group being the chosen people, and everyone else being less. Christianity is founded at least in part on that being nonsense.
temptation
Avoiding temptation implies that the desires of the body and mind are rooted in sin.
to strip their choice of ignorance of tools to use to hide behind
Most people are not capable of questioning their choices, beliefs, because of Gestalt theory. Without a firm grasp of the temporal nature of the human mind, and the relatively impotent control held by the conscious mind, you have very little chance of truly enlightening anyone.
And perhaps to your point, I refuse to teach such techniques except in person.
differences are needed to inspire form to sustain itself within flow
I still believe that form-focused thought creates a myriad of story... free of the homogeneity of flow. That perhaps our duty, in as much as existence itself can have a duty, is to revel in our constraints, and produce great works within them.
One/All
Is it wrong to take for granted that the scope of All is so grand that One|One vs One is no longer relevant? What connection to All would matter?
Get your blockchain decentralized domains while you can.