Avoiding temptation implies that the desires of the body and mind are rooted in sin.
to strip their choice of ignorance of tools to use to hide behind
Most people are not capable of questioning their choices, beliefs, because of Gestalt theory. Without a firm grasp of the temporal nature of the human mind, and the relatively impotent control held by the conscious mind, you have very little chance of truly enlightening anyone.
And perhaps to your point, I refuse to teach such techniques except in person.
differences are needed to inspire form to sustain itself within flow
I still believe that form-focused thought creates a myriad of story... free of the homogeneity of flow. That perhaps our duty, in as much as existence itself can have a duty, is to revel in our constraints, and produce great works within them.
One/All
Is it wrong to take for granted that the scope of All is so grand that One|One vs One is no longer relevant? What connection to All would matter?
Avoiding temptation implies that the desires of the body and mind are rooted in sin.
Flow represents temptation to form to ignore the sustenance of self within flow. Flow defines both the need for form to sustain self within it, and the want to be tempted by the pull of flow upon form. The root of form is flow, and the root of flow is information (energy).
Sin represents the suggested restriction upon action; based on moral rules of behavior under the laws of men (inversion of the laws of nature). Flow establishes form needing to have the free will of choice over action to be able to adapt to ever changing circumstances.
Morality is defined as forms response to flow aka ONEs responsibility over self within ALL aka the responsibility to balance between need and want by choice of action. Each one of our actions either adheres to the struggle of self sustenance (need) or ignores this for the temptation of flow pulling us towards death.
DESIRE, noun - "an emotion or excitement of the mind, directed to the attainment or possession of an object". Choice of ignorance represents the temptation of selfishness aka shirking responsibility to maintain form within flow by trying to hold onto form without adapting to flow. We cannot claim ownership over form within flow without ignoring that flow processes form from beginning towards end (growth/loss).
Most people are not capable of questioning their choices
Each ONE potential out of ALL potentiality is capable to sustain itself. The choice between need and want is instinctively (collective survival instinct) predefined by the demanded value of life over death. Need is fundamental for form within flow; while the choice to adhere to it or ignore it for wants is secondary.
Even if you choose to ignore need; you still need to adhere to self sustenance within flow through adaptation by breathing aka the spirit contract SPIR'IT, noun (Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe).
All restrictions upon comprehension (ONEs potential) are self inflicted by ONEs choices towards ALL. The self discernment needed to comprehend this implies the responsibility over ONEself within ALL.
beliefs
Energy to flow to form...then choice within form of adherence to ALL inspiration or ignorance thereof in favor for information suggested by other ONEs in exchange for consent to "believe" them.
All beliefs are based on consenting to suggested information; which one then upholds as true/false assumptions, while ignoring flow (within which there's no true/false information) One cannot proclaim "true/false" upon change without ignoring being within change.
All beliefs are based on ignorance by choice; which is why the defense for all beliefs is again ignorance. Religion (to bind anew) industrialized this ignorance by suggesting the source of suggestion to be unquestionable (deities), which puts the ignorance of all believers right in between an unquestionable authority to shirk responsibility over self onto, and and opposition (conflict of reason) to ones beliefs (the non-believer) onto which one can caste blame.
Reflection upon inside directed through suggested deflection upon outside.
because of Gestalt theory. Without a firm grasp of the temporal nature of the human mind, and the relatively impotent control held by the conscious mind,
Within energy...flow represents ALL potentiality in motion; while form represents the individual ONE potential within momentum. The flow aspect represents loss of potentiality; while the form aspect represents recharge of potentiality through unity of potential. Both together represent self sustenance of energy (information). That's the control infrastructure.
The consciousness represents the communication of ALL information; through the flow state; as inspiration to the form state. This represents our perception (input) and causes the initial growth of form within flow. After that we process that collective input of ALL perception; through the individual ONEs free will of choice (adherence or ignorance), which is what builds ONEs potential...comprehension of the perceived.
The perception sustains the foundation to keep the momentum going (hence the growth), after which choice to struggle for self sustenance adds to the recharge through form that balances the loss through flow. The foundation to sustain the momentum is needed to make sure that form cannot corrupt flow through choice of ignorance.
In short...the power of flow sustains itself by restricting the form within its momentum, to the momentum; within which form has free will of choice of action. A power within a power aka ONE potential within ALL potentiality. We are not impotent; we are given the responsibility of choice over a potential with temporary access to unlimited potentiality.
Each of us represents pure potential within a system that uses ALL to inspire each ONE to utilize it for the sustenance of self.
Gestalt theory and all science represents ONE suggesting another ONE within form what form means; which tricks them to ignore adherence to flow. They suggest the inversion of motion (time as the measurement of motion); to then attach affixed states to it (past; present; future); which allows them to act in the name of, as to get us attached to that which isn't; while ignoring that which is.
They understand flow, and set any thing they want into flow; while deceiving us to ignore flow through suggestion of form; which is why their destructive agendas are all moving forward, with us being attached to it through ignorance.
you have very little chance of truly enlightening anyone.
Each ONE is by definition inspiration to each other ONE as flow upon form. The illumination comes from within...ALL through each ONE; with free will of choice acting as the valve for growth of potential. Each ONE represents an ecosystem spreading outwards; while utilizing the inspiration of ALL as fertilizer.
Form within flow represents magnetic within electric, and each potential within magnetic needs to utilize the electric potentiality to be able to sustain the temporary magnetic form. That utilization represents perceived inspiration transmuted through choice of action into comprehended information.
Inspiration represents flow; information represents form. ONE needs to do the transmutation within ONEself to be able to sustain ONEself. We can't get it by consenting to the information suggested by other ONEs. It needs to be flow to form; not form to form.
Changing others represents a temptation for us to resist (want). The more we grow through adherence (need); the more others will choose to change themselves by adherence to the inspiration ONE represents within ALL.
And perhaps to your point, I refuse to teach such techniques except in person.
That's another inversion...(teacher and student) based on a chain of command established by consent to belief in false authority over self. As form within flow; teach/learn represents the same action when allied to self...to teach self equals to lean for self and vice versa. ONEs teacher is ALL, and each other ONE is how ALL communicates inspiration to ONE to teach/learn ONEself.
It is the teacher over student inversion that tempts you to withhold "techniques"; to claim ownership over form within flow; while ignoring that flow offers ALL to form. That's all chain of command behavior.
In person on the other hand represents direct adaptation instead of through the world wide web inversion. That's good; but more important is it to comprehend that teach/learn isn't about exchanging information; but about adapting to each others different potential as inspiration.
I still believe that form-focused thought creates a myriad of story...
That represents using form to transmute it into different form; based on ONEs potential (comprehension) of ALL. You try to create progress (another parasite inversion) by reconfiguration of form for perceived accomplishments. That's the whole "be in this world; not of it" allegory.
We are being deceived to be goal oriented; when flow defines goal for form as death (form back to flow); which in return puts the value onto balance as form within flow, and balance represents self sustenance aka growth of self; not the accomplishments of self upon other form.
Goals represent the temptation of our wants; while the struggle to sustain self represents out needs. Falling for those wants is why all our accomplishments are always crumbling down around us, and why the parasites only use form to lure us to destroy ourselves with it.
They are perceived as not being creators; but destroyers, which lacks perspective...we create (transmute) based on consent to their suggestions, and we destroy ourselves as the consequences thereof. Meanwhile they transmute information within our minds, based on whatever inspires them, which is mostly our collective ignorance towards self sustenance.
free of the homogeneity of flow
Free implies freedom (free and dominance), and ONEs actions represent reactions to the flow of ALL. Action implies acting upon. To be implies to be within. Flow implies form; motion implies momentum; velocity implies resistance...ONE implies ALL.
That perhaps our duty, in as much as existence itself can have a duty
Form represents response to flow; choice (need or want) represents responsibility over balance as form within flow.
DUTY, noun - "that which a person owes to another". That's form to form; based on the ignorance of flow; hence the ownership claim (want).
to revel in our constraints, and produce great works within them.
REV'EL, verb intransitive [Latin rabo, rabio, to rage, whence rabies, rabid.] - "to feast with loose and clamorous merriment". That's a want; not a need. Adherence to need would increase potential; which would allow more and more efficient access to possibilities. Yet; the more great shit we build; the more we are tempted to want more; while ignoring adherence to our needs. We cannot escape the balance; we need to adhere to it.
the scope of All is so grand
You perceived the grandness of ALL through the limitation within ONEself. Understanding energy and therewith being ONE potential within ALL potentiality will clear this up. Potential to potentiality represents infinite growth potential. What's missing? Flow aka the loss that defines the potential (us) to be temporary. Together we have finite within infinite.
If you comprehend this you don't "want" the infinite; because you understand that your finite existence defines it.
One vs One is no longer relevant?
All versus within the coexistence of form within flow is based on chocie of ignorance towards flow (reality) in exchange for adherence to suggested beliefs aka form (fiction). Reality and fiction are not natural states; they represent what ignorance is causing...a conflict.
Whatever you believe you measure as truth or false (also not natural states), and when you act upon any belief aka proclaiming them to everyone else; you cause a conflict of reason (truth versus false) with all those who did not consent to believe/not believe what you consented to.
All conflicts are in ignorance of flow; and comprehending this gets them out of your mind. Comprehension relieves (relevant; from Latin relever, to relieve) ignorance, which in return makes the ignorant behavior of others inspiration for the sustenance of self.
What connection to All would matter?
The direct connection of ALL to ONE...perception as input for growth; flow (loss) as the status quo upon form to resist. The latter causes the former; and choice is applied to former; which defines the rate of growth (potential aka comprehension).
Emotions themselves rely on a unidirectional flow of time, as an aspect of flow. Engaging with flow is the underlying nature of gestalt theory. You are dismissing this and claiming that the emergence of emotion itself is affixing state. While not fundamentally wrong, it is literally encoded genetically.
Maybe you or I could do such things, however humanity can not. Are you so eager to dismiss humanity? The level you speak at is so firmly disconnected from the human experience. How did you come to be?
You are spending so much time reiterating the same meanings over and over that I am having trouble discerning anything new. I get your view on flow and asceticism. Let's move on. You tell me if I need to accept it as gospel for you to be satisfied.
Emotions themselves rely on a unidirectional flow of time, as an aspect of flow. Engaging with flow is the underlying nature of gestalt theory. You are dismissing this and claiming that the emergence of emotion itself is affixing state. While not fundamentally wrong, it is literally encoded genetically.
Emotion (to move from) implies being within flow; which then implies not being able to move out of flow; which thereby represents ignorance of flow. Emotion represents a response of form to flow. Meanwhile form constantly adapts to flow by choice (free will) of action; which result in emotions as temptations in need of resistance by yet another choice of action.
time
Time contradicts flow; since it's being suggested in affixed states (past; present; future). Each waiting for consent by free will to uphold them as beliefs (affixed assumptions) in ignorance of flow; which translates to self inflicted trauma...past (loss); future (hope/fear); and present (stress). All these traumas are being mass suggested by the same parasites who industrialized the suggestion of time, which is also why the screen you're looking at (unless blocked) has a clock on it.
Gestalt theory
That suggestion operates under the umbrella of gestaltism/configurationism; which is under the umbrella of psychologism; which is under the umbrella of scientism; which is under the umbrella of religion (to bind anew)...which exploits offer/consent under the laws of nature (as defined by motion).
Theory (speculation; contemplation) represents a suggested contradiction for those with eyes to see. Why? Because one already consented to the offered -ism before starting to speculate/contemplate about anything.
Our parasites use rhetoric like this as a litmus test to quickly get a potent (comprehension) or impotent (ignorance) response. They comprehend that any action in ignorance of self sustenance of form within flow represents ignored potential (impotence).
Maybe you or I could do such things, however humanity can not.
Each ONE potential has access to ALL potentiality, and those with free will of choice over action, represent their own obstacle within growth/loss. Those who have the choice can choose between need and want, and they do choose...want over need.
That represents the choice of ignorance within the many; that causes the response...the parasitic exploitation...within the few who comprehend that weakness.
Are you so eager to dismiss humanity?
ALL represents inspiration to each ONE; which is what I need to struggle to adhere to. Meanwhile; all perceived inspiration (flow) also represents temptation of temporary information (form) ...it's ONEs choice what to do with it for each action.
HUMAN'ITY, noun [Latin humanitas.] - "the peculiar nature of man, by which he is distinguished from other beings".
This represents the parasite inversion that uses the collective to deceive the individual to ignore adherence to the sustenance of self. Our parasites are the ones cloaking themselves under humanitarianism, and most of the -isms they're suggesting are worshiping the status of men as the apex of life over the rest of the AN'IMALs, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]
The Latin translation already implies the self destruction of setting oneself above "air; breathe; soul". The gist of the trick here is to idolize the collective so that the individual consents to believe it; while ignoring self.
Real unity represents ONEs adherence to ALL aka resonance of from with flow; which represents an ongoing balance act; which automatically (hierarchy based on needs) unites in shared sustenance. For example procreation...balance between natural opposites (male/female); achieved by individual adherence to self sustenance (the need to procreate), which leads to the family "unit". A unity based on needs representing growth, which attracts others.
If you "want" to help others; you ignore the "need" to sustain self. Adherence to need increases ONEs potential (comprehension); which makes ONEs actions more efficient, which in return benefits those around him, who will be attracted through inspiration to unite in adherence to need (ALL).
The level you speak at is so firmly disconnected from the human experience. How did you come to be?
Society is being suggested, and the intent behind it is to corrupt comprehension through ignorance as to farm; harvest and destroy the majority over and over again. In short...a maintenance racket exploiting ignorance to farm form within flow.
The way out is comprehension, and I ran into enough lies that it inspired me to question the act of believing. The only thing in the way between restrictive beliefs and unrestricted (less restricted) comprehension was my choice of ignorance (my wants).
It took me nearly ten years to allow myself to question the laws of nature without the religious connotation attached to it. Afterwards all the beliefs fell like dominoes, and it was me upholding them by consenting to suggestions.
You are spending so much time reiterating the same meanings over and over that I am having trouble discerning anything new.
It is you that believes in time; while ignoring momentum within motion, and your want for "new" is what you ignore ALL representing freely available information for. ALL information already exists (there's nothing new under the sun-allegory); ALL is offered as inspiration to your perception; it is the ONE that lacks comprehension, and that's what the momentum helps building...if ONE chooses to adhere to it.
What I'm doing is adaptation over and over and over again to the inspiration of flow for the sustenance of ONEself (form). For you it represents a frustrating wall of text; within which you try to seek "new" information; because you want more (falling for temptation). For me it's just of the cuffs adaptation; based on increasing potential.
I get your view on flow
Doesn't proclaiming "my view on flow" contradict your comprehension of being form within flow?
asceticism
If you would comprehend flow; you wouldn't contradict balance as form within flow through suggested -isms. Also; the ascetic "abstinence from temptation" dogma is in ignorance of flow representing temptation to each action, same with their spiritual "goals". The "goal" of inception represents death within flow, which puts the value of life on balance of form within flow; not goals...responsibility.
You tell me if I need to accept it as gospel for you to be satisfied.
You perceive information; while ignoring inspiration; you utilize reason (truth vs false) over implication (if/then), you choose between believing and not-believing; while trying to appease me.
You're reading text on suggested technology. Try to dissociate it from me (I'm not there). Adapt to whatever inspires you within that text. Use that text to work on yourself. When you write, don't aim at me; write down what you think; which should be in adherence to self sustenance. Don't fall for the temptation to believe/not believe anything you read, and you will realize that you will then don't have to reason about what you believe/not believe aka no consent to conflict.
The more you do this (adaptation to inspiration) the more you realize that the "wants" of others are trying to suggest you to consent to endless conflicts. Once that clicks; their suggestions become impotent to you.
Use me as a tool...throw any topic at me and watch what I will adapt to. "flow" isn't some check mark for us to approve and move on; it's what allows us to be; to act; to choose etc.
emotions as temptations in need of resistance by yet another choice of action
yet form projects form into flow, from a present perspective facing the future, without which the form cannot apply intelligence
emotion existing solely from divergent projected flow, due to inadequacies of form
those inadequacies are real, and to abandon them would be to abandon thought itself
Each ONE potential out of ALL potentiality is capable to sustain itself.
yet sustenance itself is not judged, is not valued, is not placed, without projections of form upon flow
All beliefs are based on consenting to suggested information
Well, yes, thus ontology and general metaphysics, due which degree we consciously consent marks a degree of maturity in my opinion, and so the vast majority are ignorant of this topic in entirety.
All these traumas are being mass suggested by the same parasites who industrialized the suggestion of time
I don't understand decoupling time from flow. How do I explore this.
the self destruction of setting oneself above
Yes. Organized religion can teach many concepts through implied consent that would otherwise be impossible for lesser intellects to grasp. You say you struggle with this. It matters not whether it is a limitation of body or soul that prevents, simply accepting that a line is drawn is sufficient. On one side, the capability to break free, on the other, nothing. Perceiving either the capability or the potential as derived from inspiration from ALL? I'm not sure it matters if that is the result.
Doesn't proclaiming "my view on flow" contradict your comprehension of being form within flow?
No, i accept it as universal. There is no conflict for I am either sharing the same belief, or without opinion on the aspects which I do not understand. There is only so much confidence I can have as to whether I understand from the written word, thus the chosen grammatical structure.
Society is being suggested
yes
The way out is comprehension
out? of suggestion, ok, but to? to comprehension of the suggestion? to comprehension of the all? It matters not where reality lies if the soul is satisfied, or does it?
beliefs fell
One by one nearly all tradition, ritual, and habit of the ordinary now feels foreign and distasteful. I can relate to this, and it leads only to a personal journey. Maybe some confluence will make this more rewarding than isolation.
asceticism
Yes, I chose the word precisely for your stated response. I don't get why you ended with the word responsibility... unless you meant it as an appositive for goals.
satisfied
Yes I wrote that sentence to be patronizing and cute. Any goals or expectations I had have been met. If there was a stability contest I'm sure I would qualify. Now I simply am. If I take on any role it is that of a teacher. To that end I sift through information to find truths, and reprocess to find false beliefs.
as a tool
I don't know what I don't know. What I think I want to know that I don't is extremely technical.
I don't have any philosophical or lifestyle questions. The two biggest questions on my mind:
How is acetone metabolized in the body? It appears to be a primary fuel, but literature claims it is a waste product. Energy-producing Ketone shortage in the brain seems to be the cause of childhood myopia.
How did the somatoscope magnify light?
Partial description:
"Two light sources, one incandescent with a wavelength of 3,300 angstroms, the other ultraviolet of 1,850 angstroms, start pulsating, producing a third wavelength. This wave goes through a monochromator which produces a ray. This ray is exposed to a magnetic field (the Zeemann effect) which splits it into parallel rays. One of these rays is treated by a Kerr cell which increases its frequency. This cell is then stimulated by a step generator-oscillator at frequencies which vary from 250 to 1,200 megahertz. The modulation of a visible light frequency ranging from 250 to 1,200 megahertz produces a basic frequency ranging from 250 to 1,200 megahertz, but also harmonics at a higher frequency (if we use light in the order of 2,000 MHz). ... the resolution of this instrument is in the order of 150 angstroms and the power of its magnification varies from 2,000 to 30,000." (Gaston Naessens)
Avoiding temptation implies that the desires of the body and mind are rooted in sin.
Most people are not capable of questioning their choices, beliefs, because of Gestalt theory. Without a firm grasp of the temporal nature of the human mind, and the relatively impotent control held by the conscious mind, you have very little chance of truly enlightening anyone.
And perhaps to your point, I refuse to teach such techniques except in person.
I still believe that form-focused thought creates a myriad of story... free of the homogeneity of flow. That perhaps our duty, in as much as existence itself can have a duty, is to revel in our constraints, and produce great works within them.
Is it wrong to take for granted that the scope of All is so grand that One|One vs One is no longer relevant? What connection to All would matter?
Flow represents temptation to form to ignore the sustenance of self within flow. Flow defines both the need for form to sustain self within it, and the want to be tempted by the pull of flow upon form. The root of form is flow, and the root of flow is information (energy).
Sin represents the suggested restriction upon action; based on moral rules of behavior under the laws of men (inversion of the laws of nature). Flow establishes form needing to have the free will of choice over action to be able to adapt to ever changing circumstances.
Morality is defined as forms response to flow aka ONEs responsibility over self within ALL aka the responsibility to balance between need and want by choice of action. Each one of our actions either adheres to the struggle of self sustenance (need) or ignores this for the temptation of flow pulling us towards death.
DESIRE, noun - "an emotion or excitement of the mind, directed to the attainment or possession of an object". Choice of ignorance represents the temptation of selfishness aka shirking responsibility to maintain form within flow by trying to hold onto form without adapting to flow. We cannot claim ownership over form within flow without ignoring that flow processes form from beginning towards end (growth/loss).
Each ONE potential out of ALL potentiality is capable to sustain itself. The choice between need and want is instinctively (collective survival instinct) predefined by the demanded value of life over death. Need is fundamental for form within flow; while the choice to adhere to it or ignore it for wants is secondary.
Even if you choose to ignore need; you still need to adhere to self sustenance within flow through adaptation by breathing aka the spirit contract SPIR'IT, noun (Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe).
All restrictions upon comprehension (ONEs potential) are self inflicted by ONEs choices towards ALL. The self discernment needed to comprehend this implies the responsibility over ONEself within ALL.
Energy to flow to form...then choice within form of adherence to ALL inspiration or ignorance thereof in favor for information suggested by other ONEs in exchange for consent to "believe" them.
All beliefs are based on consenting to suggested information; which one then upholds as true/false assumptions, while ignoring flow (within which there's no true/false information) One cannot proclaim "true/false" upon change without ignoring being within change.
All beliefs are based on ignorance by choice; which is why the defense for all beliefs is again ignorance. Religion (to bind anew) industrialized this ignorance by suggesting the source of suggestion to be unquestionable (deities), which puts the ignorance of all believers right in between an unquestionable authority to shirk responsibility over self onto, and and opposition (conflict of reason) to ones beliefs (the non-believer) onto which one can caste blame.
Reflection upon inside directed through suggested deflection upon outside.
Within energy...flow represents ALL potentiality in motion; while form represents the individual ONE potential within momentum. The flow aspect represents loss of potentiality; while the form aspect represents recharge of potentiality through unity of potential. Both together represent self sustenance of energy (information). That's the control infrastructure.
The consciousness represents the communication of ALL information; through the flow state; as inspiration to the form state. This represents our perception (input) and causes the initial growth of form within flow. After that we process that collective input of ALL perception; through the individual ONEs free will of choice (adherence or ignorance), which is what builds ONEs potential...comprehension of the perceived.
The perception sustains the foundation to keep the momentum going (hence the growth), after which choice to struggle for self sustenance adds to the recharge through form that balances the loss through flow. The foundation to sustain the momentum is needed to make sure that form cannot corrupt flow through choice of ignorance.
In short...the power of flow sustains itself by restricting the form within its momentum, to the momentum; within which form has free will of choice of action. A power within a power aka ONE potential within ALL potentiality. We are not impotent; we are given the responsibility of choice over a potential with temporary access to unlimited potentiality.
Each of us represents pure potential within a system that uses ALL to inspire each ONE to utilize it for the sustenance of self.
Gestalt theory and all science represents ONE suggesting another ONE within form what form means; which tricks them to ignore adherence to flow. They suggest the inversion of motion (time as the measurement of motion); to then attach affixed states to it (past; present; future); which allows them to act in the name of, as to get us attached to that which isn't; while ignoring that which is.
They understand flow, and set any thing they want into flow; while deceiving us to ignore flow through suggestion of form; which is why their destructive agendas are all moving forward, with us being attached to it through ignorance.
Each ONE is by definition inspiration to each other ONE as flow upon form. The illumination comes from within...ALL through each ONE; with free will of choice acting as the valve for growth of potential. Each ONE represents an ecosystem spreading outwards; while utilizing the inspiration of ALL as fertilizer.
Form within flow represents magnetic within electric, and each potential within magnetic needs to utilize the electric potentiality to be able to sustain the temporary magnetic form. That utilization represents perceived inspiration transmuted through choice of action into comprehended information.
Inspiration represents flow; information represents form. ONE needs to do the transmutation within ONEself to be able to sustain ONEself. We can't get it by consenting to the information suggested by other ONEs. It needs to be flow to form; not form to form.
Changing others represents a temptation for us to resist (want). The more we grow through adherence (need); the more others will choose to change themselves by adherence to the inspiration ONE represents within ALL.
That's another inversion...(teacher and student) based on a chain of command established by consent to belief in false authority over self. As form within flow; teach/learn represents the same action when allied to self...to teach self equals to lean for self and vice versa. ONEs teacher is ALL, and each other ONE is how ALL communicates inspiration to ONE to teach/learn ONEself.
It is the teacher over student inversion that tempts you to withhold "techniques"; to claim ownership over form within flow; while ignoring that flow offers ALL to form. That's all chain of command behavior.
In person on the other hand represents direct adaptation instead of through the world wide web inversion. That's good; but more important is it to comprehend that teach/learn isn't about exchanging information; but about adapting to each others different potential as inspiration.
That represents using form to transmute it into different form; based on ONEs potential (comprehension) of ALL. You try to create progress (another parasite inversion) by reconfiguration of form for perceived accomplishments. That's the whole "be in this world; not of it" allegory.
We are being deceived to be goal oriented; when flow defines goal for form as death (form back to flow); which in return puts the value onto balance as form within flow, and balance represents self sustenance aka growth of self; not the accomplishments of self upon other form.
Goals represent the temptation of our wants; while the struggle to sustain self represents out needs. Falling for those wants is why all our accomplishments are always crumbling down around us, and why the parasites only use form to lure us to destroy ourselves with it.
They are perceived as not being creators; but destroyers, which lacks perspective...we create (transmute) based on consent to their suggestions, and we destroy ourselves as the consequences thereof. Meanwhile they transmute information within our minds, based on whatever inspires them, which is mostly our collective ignorance towards self sustenance.
Free implies freedom (free and dominance), and ONEs actions represent reactions to the flow of ALL. Action implies acting upon. To be implies to be within. Flow implies form; motion implies momentum; velocity implies resistance...ONE implies ALL.
Form represents response to flow; choice (need or want) represents responsibility over balance as form within flow.
DUTY, noun - "that which a person owes to another". That's form to form; based on the ignorance of flow; hence the ownership claim (want).
REV'EL, verb intransitive [Latin rabo, rabio, to rage, whence rabies, rabid.] - "to feast with loose and clamorous merriment". That's a want; not a need. Adherence to need would increase potential; which would allow more and more efficient access to possibilities. Yet; the more great shit we build; the more we are tempted to want more; while ignoring adherence to our needs. We cannot escape the balance; we need to adhere to it.
You perceived the grandness of ALL through the limitation within ONEself. Understanding energy and therewith being ONE potential within ALL potentiality will clear this up. Potential to potentiality represents infinite growth potential. What's missing? Flow aka the loss that defines the potential (us) to be temporary. Together we have finite within infinite.
If you comprehend this you don't "want" the infinite; because you understand that your finite existence defines it.
All versus within the coexistence of form within flow is based on chocie of ignorance towards flow (reality) in exchange for adherence to suggested beliefs aka form (fiction). Reality and fiction are not natural states; they represent what ignorance is causing...a conflict.
Whatever you believe you measure as truth or false (also not natural states), and when you act upon any belief aka proclaiming them to everyone else; you cause a conflict of reason (truth versus false) with all those who did not consent to believe/not believe what you consented to.
All conflicts are in ignorance of flow; and comprehending this gets them out of your mind. Comprehension relieves (relevant; from Latin relever, to relieve) ignorance, which in return makes the ignorant behavior of others inspiration for the sustenance of self.
The direct connection of ALL to ONE...perception as input for growth; flow (loss) as the status quo upon form to resist. The latter causes the former; and choice is applied to former; which defines the rate of growth (potential aka comprehension).
Emotions themselves rely on a unidirectional flow of time, as an aspect of flow. Engaging with flow is the underlying nature of gestalt theory. You are dismissing this and claiming that the emergence of emotion itself is affixing state. While not fundamentally wrong, it is literally encoded genetically.
Maybe you or I could do such things, however humanity can not. Are you so eager to dismiss humanity? The level you speak at is so firmly disconnected from the human experience. How did you come to be?
You are spending so much time reiterating the same meanings over and over that I am having trouble discerning anything new. I get your view on flow and asceticism. Let's move on. You tell me if I need to accept it as gospel for you to be satisfied.
Emotion (to move from) implies being within flow; which then implies not being able to move out of flow; which thereby represents ignorance of flow. Emotion represents a response of form to flow. Meanwhile form constantly adapts to flow by choice (free will) of action; which result in emotions as temptations in need of resistance by yet another choice of action.
Time contradicts flow; since it's being suggested in affixed states (past; present; future). Each waiting for consent by free will to uphold them as beliefs (affixed assumptions) in ignorance of flow; which translates to self inflicted trauma...past (loss); future (hope/fear); and present (stress). All these traumas are being mass suggested by the same parasites who industrialized the suggestion of time, which is also why the screen you're looking at (unless blocked) has a clock on it.
That suggestion operates under the umbrella of gestaltism/configurationism; which is under the umbrella of psychologism; which is under the umbrella of scientism; which is under the umbrella of religion (to bind anew)...which exploits offer/consent under the laws of nature (as defined by motion).
Theory (speculation; contemplation) represents a suggested contradiction for those with eyes to see. Why? Because one already consented to the offered -ism before starting to speculate/contemplate about anything.
Our parasites use rhetoric like this as a litmus test to quickly get a potent (comprehension) or impotent (ignorance) response. They comprehend that any action in ignorance of self sustenance of form within flow represents ignored potential (impotence).
Each ONE potential has access to ALL potentiality, and those with free will of choice over action, represent their own obstacle within growth/loss. Those who have the choice can choose between need and want, and they do choose...want over need.
That represents the choice of ignorance within the many; that causes the response...the parasitic exploitation...within the few who comprehend that weakness.
ALL represents inspiration to each ONE; which is what I need to struggle to adhere to. Meanwhile; all perceived inspiration (flow) also represents temptation of temporary information (form) ...it's ONEs choice what to do with it for each action.
HUMAN'ITY, noun [Latin humanitas.] - "the peculiar nature of man, by which he is distinguished from other beings".
This represents the parasite inversion that uses the collective to deceive the individual to ignore adherence to the sustenance of self. Our parasites are the ones cloaking themselves under humanitarianism, and most of the -isms they're suggesting are worshiping the status of men as the apex of life over the rest of the AN'IMALs, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]
The Latin translation already implies the self destruction of setting oneself above "air; breathe; soul". The gist of the trick here is to idolize the collective so that the individual consents to believe it; while ignoring self.
Real unity represents ONEs adherence to ALL aka resonance of from with flow; which represents an ongoing balance act; which automatically (hierarchy based on needs) unites in shared sustenance. For example procreation...balance between natural opposites (male/female); achieved by individual adherence to self sustenance (the need to procreate), which leads to the family "unit". A unity based on needs representing growth, which attracts others.
If you "want" to help others; you ignore the "need" to sustain self. Adherence to need increases ONEs potential (comprehension); which makes ONEs actions more efficient, which in return benefits those around him, who will be attracted through inspiration to unite in adherence to need (ALL).
Society is being suggested, and the intent behind it is to corrupt comprehension through ignorance as to farm; harvest and destroy the majority over and over again. In short...a maintenance racket exploiting ignorance to farm form within flow.
The way out is comprehension, and I ran into enough lies that it inspired me to question the act of believing. The only thing in the way between restrictive beliefs and unrestricted (less restricted) comprehension was my choice of ignorance (my wants).
It took me nearly ten years to allow myself to question the laws of nature without the religious connotation attached to it. Afterwards all the beliefs fell like dominoes, and it was me upholding them by consenting to suggestions.
It is you that believes in time; while ignoring momentum within motion, and your want for "new" is what you ignore ALL representing freely available information for. ALL information already exists (there's nothing new under the sun-allegory); ALL is offered as inspiration to your perception; it is the ONE that lacks comprehension, and that's what the momentum helps building...if ONE chooses to adhere to it.
What I'm doing is adaptation over and over and over again to the inspiration of flow for the sustenance of ONEself (form). For you it represents a frustrating wall of text; within which you try to seek "new" information; because you want more (falling for temptation). For me it's just of the cuffs adaptation; based on increasing potential.
Doesn't proclaiming "my view on flow" contradict your comprehension of being form within flow?
If you would comprehend flow; you wouldn't contradict balance as form within flow through suggested -isms. Also; the ascetic "abstinence from temptation" dogma is in ignorance of flow representing temptation to each action, same with their spiritual "goals". The "goal" of inception represents death within flow, which puts the value of life on balance of form within flow; not goals...responsibility.
You perceive information; while ignoring inspiration; you utilize reason (truth vs false) over implication (if/then), you choose between believing and not-believing; while trying to appease me.
You're reading text on suggested technology. Try to dissociate it from me (I'm not there). Adapt to whatever inspires you within that text. Use that text to work on yourself. When you write, don't aim at me; write down what you think; which should be in adherence to self sustenance. Don't fall for the temptation to believe/not believe anything you read, and you will realize that you will then don't have to reason about what you believe/not believe aka no consent to conflict.
The more you do this (adaptation to inspiration) the more you realize that the "wants" of others are trying to suggest you to consent to endless conflicts. Once that clicks; their suggestions become impotent to you.
Use me as a tool...throw any topic at me and watch what I will adapt to. "flow" isn't some check mark for us to approve and move on; it's what allows us to be; to act; to choose etc.
yet form projects form into flow, from a present perspective facing the future, without which the form cannot apply intelligence
emotion existing solely from divergent projected flow, due to inadequacies of form
those inadequacies are real, and to abandon them would be to abandon thought itself
yet sustenance itself is not judged, is not valued, is not placed, without projections of form upon flow
Well, yes, thus ontology and general metaphysics, due which degree we consciously consent marks a degree of maturity in my opinion, and so the vast majority are ignorant of this topic in entirety.
I don't understand decoupling time from flow. How do I explore this.
Yes. Organized religion can teach many concepts through implied consent that would otherwise be impossible for lesser intellects to grasp. You say you struggle with this. It matters not whether it is a limitation of body or soul that prevents, simply accepting that a line is drawn is sufficient. On one side, the capability to break free, on the other, nothing. Perceiving either the capability or the potential as derived from inspiration from ALL? I'm not sure it matters if that is the result.
No, i accept it as universal. There is no conflict for I am either sharing the same belief, or without opinion on the aspects which I do not understand. There is only so much confidence I can have as to whether I understand from the written word, thus the chosen grammatical structure.
yes
out? of suggestion, ok, but to? to comprehension of the suggestion? to comprehension of the all? It matters not where reality lies if the soul is satisfied, or does it?
One by one nearly all tradition, ritual, and habit of the ordinary now feels foreign and distasteful. I can relate to this, and it leads only to a personal journey. Maybe some confluence will make this more rewarding than isolation.
Yes, I chose the word precisely for your stated response. I don't get why you ended with the word responsibility... unless you meant it as an appositive for goals.
Yes I wrote that sentence to be patronizing and cute. Any goals or expectations I had have been met. If there was a stability contest I'm sure I would qualify. Now I simply am. If I take on any role it is that of a teacher. To that end I sift through information to find truths, and reprocess to find false beliefs.
I don't know what I don't know. What I think I want to know that I don't is extremely technical.
I don't have any philosophical or lifestyle questions. The two biggest questions on my mind:
How is acetone metabolized in the body? It appears to be a primary fuel, but literature claims it is a waste product. Energy-producing Ketone shortage in the brain seems to be the cause of childhood myopia.
How did the somatoscope magnify light? Partial description: "Two light sources, one incandescent with a wavelength of 3,300 angstroms, the other ultraviolet of 1,850 angstroms, start pulsating, producing a third wavelength. This wave goes through a monochromator which produces a ray. This ray is exposed to a magnetic field (the Zeemann effect) which splits it into parallel rays. One of these rays is treated by a Kerr cell which increases its frequency. This cell is then stimulated by a step generator-oscillator at frequencies which vary from 250 to 1,200 megahertz. The modulation of a visible light frequency ranging from 250 to 1,200 megahertz produces a basic frequency ranging from 250 to 1,200 megahertz, but also harmonics at a higher frequency (if we use light in the order of 2,000 MHz). ... the resolution of this instrument is in the order of 150 angstroms and the power of its magnification varies from 2,000 to 30,000." (Gaston Naessens)