Since the election/Jan 6th especially I’ve become more and more convinced Q was a psyop by the globalists to slay the hydra known as populism, what makes you think it still should be trusted with your faith?
What are your thoughts on “pre-history”? And what I’m asking about specifically is the time period from 300,000 years ago (emergence of anatomically modern humans) to 12,000 years ago I.E. what is called the emergence of civilization near the fertile crescent?
I personally feel like our entire drama could have played out multiple times before (except the flood precedes the garden).
When you say white Christian conservatives do you actually mean asian Falun Gong anti communists?
Otherwise I think you missed the point.
Or are you just another shill?
Keep pretending to be a retard and you’ll find everyone just thinks you’re a retard
40% of america/vast majority of the world is “non-white” therefore using that alone as your criteria for selection -before we even get to the question of validity in your ideas (highly questionable)- is a non-starter. And frankly disgusting. Would you want 40% of america wishing you dead? You’ll get it if you keep things up.
You two are acting like idjits or forum sliders. This place isn’t racism.org it’s conspiracies.win and if you can’t see how what you’re doing puts you in the category of “divided and conquered” (conspiracies.lose) then yer a tard
You two are acting like either faggots or agent provocateurs. This place isn’t racism.org it’s conspiracies.win and if you can’t see how what you’re doing puts you in the category of “divided and conquered” (conspiracies.lose) then yer a tard
95% sure this guys a zionist shill. Literally impossible to get an answer or explanation to any of his unsourced claims
Try to find this or discussions about it, pretty certain there was a really in-depth reddit thread on this book but I doubt I can find it given their tendency to purge truth
The Gospel of Thomas.
Who ever would have thought that a “book” consisting of 114 sayings found in a cave could be so insightful
Follow the money. Lincoln instituted the greenback to fight the central bankers in London who thought that by backing the Confederacy they could regain the foothold in America they lost during the revolution.
Whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them.
It’s easier to fool a man than to convince him he’s been fooled
WhoTheHellCares.jpg
I’ve been trying to get this guy to answer that question for over a month, you should ask him lol
as a functional group of oppressors as opposed to LARPer “pagans”.
There totally are LARPers on youtube giving “gnostic sermons”, more power to them, but this whole discussion is about me wanting proof that there are any “gnostics” involved in the big power plays of historical/modern conspiracy, like those that can be readily demonstrated about the Roman Catholic Church, the zionists, or the jesuits.
It seems like the vast majority that adapt this knowledge seek to conceal it and keep it for themselves, even the great chi masters thousands of years ago hid this knowledge.
Maybe that is part and parcel with being able to preserve it, what do you think? And what do you think the earliest adaptation of this knowledge we still have is?
This is why definitions matter so much. Under the old definition of herd immunity if America had reached herd immunity and Uganda hadn’t it wouldn’t matter because even if an infected Ugandan came to america the virus wouldn’t spread.
However under the new definition, which includes these RNA treatments, populations who have reached “Herd Immunity” can almost all still transmit the virus since they aren’t actually immune (via attenuated virus exposure or having gotten over a real infection) they just “are primed to fight an infection” by the RNA fuckery (supposedly atleast)
What I see: a slightly “expanded” (edited) interpretation of the 7 chakras, starting clearly from the root, and occasionally showing one chakra expanded into two spheres, in a sense to show the composite nature of those chakras/energy centers.
The version most are familiar with is even more explicit in this branching technique:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Kabbalah_Tree_of_Life.png
To me it seems like the classic case of a later group stealing an earlier groups knowledge/spiritual technology, making a few changes and saying “I made this”.
I do think that what is represented here has validity in some sense and relavent, practical use to us. That is the only explanation I can come up with for how so many independent cultures developed their own, highly overlapping, human “bio energy” paradigms.
Thoughts? Insights? Inspirations? Thanks
Two things: what do you think the most important meanings of the kabbalistic tree of life? I find the symbol appearing a ton and would like to know what the board thinks, might make a post on that
And secondly, you should post last nights thread in the Jesuit megathread, it’s pretty fitting there and deserves more discussion imo
All you do is spout nonsense and when asked to back it up you move your nonsense to a different thread.
The Catholic Church exterminated the gnostics nearly 2000 years ago. Irenaeus was a founding father of the RCC and literally wrote the book called “On Heresies” to exterminate gnostic thought in Rome.
So you’ve literally completely flipped history to invert and pervert the minds of others. Classic Zionist shill.
Awww poor u/syrian , forced to use an alt cuz his main got banned for being a faggot
Doomerslayer is a shill and alt of Syrian, confirmed months ago, still a faggot
Yes, but also why not both?
I think you’ll do fine here
Two confirmed shills and a guy claiming he takes orders from a bald alien... wow they really snapped at the bait with this one
Thoughts on Graham Hancock/Randall Carlson/Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis?
Those guys posit something, likely an asteroid impact at one of the poles, triggering a rapid melt of glaciers and thus a (worldwide) flood 12,000 years ago.
I take your comment about timelines to heart, but I’ve never seen compelling evidence that the general timeline on the emergence of anatomically modern humans is anything like what some people exegise from adding up the ages of adams line to get ~6000. There’s solid evidence of native/indigenous groups in the americas dating back 50,000+ years before you even get to the things like mechanical tool scrapes on mammoth bones dated to 130,000 years ago which is a more recent discovery but valid in my understanding. Where do you fall on the spectrum?