But even bigger problem that electromagnetic radiation for electronics is... HEATING.
More specifically, COOLING! Lol
I’m not super informed on this part, but my educated guess is basically gravity+friction+viscosity.
I’m sure you understand viscosity in the example of, say, honey, but it can be harder to understand for less (lmao) viscous fluids like water or air, but the same principle applies. Imagine the atmosphere was made of honey and not air. The earth would rotate and the honey just on the surface of the earth would match that rotation, then the layer of honey just above the layer touching the earth will start moving, not as fast as the bottom layer (yet). Then allow the system time to equilibrate, each layer slowly having reached its max rotational speed through the combination of gravity, friction, and viscosity. As the honey gets thinner the effects of viscosity will be less pronounced, thus less friction on surrounding objects like satellites and shit.
I think you’re definitely onto something that science tries very hard to bury it’s head in the sand over.
“Dark energy” = energy inherent to “space” itself = “quantum foam” = “zero-point energy” = “aether” = some level of existence more fundamental than our own, from which ours is borne out of in a fractal expression of infinity, as above so below.
Photons can travel because of their massless nature, no momentum to overcome. Air would only impede a photons travel, known as “refractive index” of a material (i.e. air, water, or mostly empty space)
I think the key thing to understand here is the closed system and what it means. To explain, and try to incorporate your examples, I’ll try:
Imagine a glass aquarium, even one complex enough to have currents inside it (for example a little submerged air jet in one corner which makes the water circulate around the aquarium). So inside this aquarium we have the examples you’ve mentioned, a mini-surfer would have to expend extra energy to move against the current generated by the air jet, or the surfer could ride the current such that he moves with it while expending less energy than if he attempted to stay stationary.
That’s just the system of the aquarium however, a closed system I constructed for the example. Now imagine that the aquarium is placed on a truck bed and the truck+aquarium system is smoothly accelerated to, for example, 50mph westward. If we return to the mini surfer, nothing has changed from his perspective (since we accelerated smoothly no extra disturbances have been introduced to the aquarium, the air jet induced current is exactly how it would have been if the aquarium had stayed “stationary”). At this point you could even put the westerly driving truck on a planet rotating easterly at (1/24 * earth’s circumference) miles per hour, and it would likewise not change the scenario inside the aquarium, nor even for the truck, or even an airplane.
This applies to all of your examples, the tide, water currents, and air currents, as they are all representative of forces within the system that our object is trying to reach equilibrium with. Zoomed out, you’ll see that the planet (including the atmosphere) is the closed aquarium system. Everything’s already in equilibrium so there’s nothing to overcome. (Currents are just small localized zones of the system which are not yet equilibriated, because our “aquarium” is so big and multifaceted, small pockets of non-equilibrium can occur).
So if you are already in equilibrium with the planets rotation, you will, like the mini surfer, never notice this “force” nor need to account for it in your simple calculations such as flight times, assuming negligible wind (wind being air motion that isnt brought about by the rotation of the earth+atmosphere but by things like temperature gradients from the equator north or south, or any number of causes). That all make any more sense?
Edit: to summarize, the trucks westward velocity in this example is analogous to the planets easterly rotation. Since the acceleration happens smoothly and never stops, when you were born you were in equilibrium with the system because your parents and everything else in our closed system is already, you never leave equilibrium with the movement,and thus it can be ignored in your calculations and it appears “non-existent”
You got me thinking quite hard with this, I think this is on the right track:
Imagine a sealed tube travelling on the ground, with you inside it, the whole set up going 50 mph west.
If you jumped while standing in the tube, it wouldn’t travel underneath you (50mph * 2 second hang time), you and the air in the tube and the tube itself are all moving the same velocity in the same direction, so when you jump you come down in the same (relative) spot in the tube.
Likewise, if you decided to walk from west to east inside this tube, you would not need to overcome a countering westward force (the tubes westward 50mph velocity), for the same reason. The air in the tube is already a part of the closed system of the tube, it isn’t an “extra” force you have to overcome because you are already in equilibrium with it by virtue of being inside the tube.
Then you apply this metaphor to the earth herself. The atmosphere is the air in the tube, and the tube is the (relatively) closed system known as “earth + atmosphere”. Any part of that seem off to you?
99% of the “normal” matter in space (so ignoring dark matter and dark energy) is plasma aka electrically charged gas, and plasma is an excellent conductor.
There’s plenty of reason to think that the large stellar nurseries, “nebula”, are electric/magnetic structures as opposed to gravitationally constructed. Check out “The Electric Universe” on YT
To address your question about interference, radiation shielding on the shuttle and for various pieces of susceptible tech
I think the idea is that behind the facade of the “civilian” space program (challenger, discovery, etc) there is a “military/secret” space program. The explosion, in that scenario, would have been of the real military vehicle, which explains why the civilian crew is “still alive”, I’m not sure which, if either, scenario is true but there’s certainly more to the story I can recognize that much.
then a much more time and energy would be required to fly against it
Two considerations to add to this:
-
most planes ascend to 20-30,000 feet in order to minimize the drag of the atmosphere
-
“jet streams” and similar phenomena can go counter to the earths rotation. The atmosphere is a highly “chaotic” system and things are moving in all directions at once, it’s just the average or prevailing movement that follows the rotation, theoretically:
“Wet cloth sheets being dried by body heat alone in a -25* snowstorm”
“Temperature of chosen finger tips varying by up to 18*C on demand”
Yep really sounds like “nitrocellulose” lmfao
Yes, monks in the mountains of tibet are drying wet sheets wrapped around them while they sit outside in -25* snow storms via “a magicians trick”, same with the Harvard researchers in their closed, controlled environment.
Kek
Unlikely, you seem to lack the discernment required to ignite newspaper with your will alone. Congrats on having your parents send you to magic camp though maybe once this whole pandemic things over you can beg them to let you go back.
You’re an idiot lol, go read the comment, nothing to do with chemical reactions.
There’s zero chance you read any of the data or watched the documentary in the few minutes since my comment.
What exactly are you basing this response on? The gif? Read the comment in the post you seem to misunderstand the post lol
https://communities.win/c/General/p/12i43vOtzV/the-suppressed-potential-of-man/c/
I find this to be extremely strong evidence for something beyond deterministic physics at play, even in our plane/“context” of existence
I had a thought the other day, what if the goal is to create an echo chamber for controlling the “left” leaning conspiracy theorists. Pretty obvious thought but the point being that in order to create that echo chamber they have to trim away the dissenting branches.
This site certainly leans “right”, so it seems the divide and conquer agenda is proceeding as planned, unfortunately. The last 4 years have seemingly undone a lot of the progress made in waking people up to the 99% vs the 1%, now the two 49.5% groups are back fighting over mostly stupid (false debate) shit like race and self defense and politics.
Do you think that when the ISS is on the left of the moon’s shadow line it should also be in the dark?
You are one sad loser lmfao, I guarantee this guy has more friends than you
Is English a second language or are you a chat bot becoming sentient and trying to escape the 2D plane of silicon hell you currently reside in?
Because I still don’t understand your issue here conceptually... try making a model or something if you don’t get it because it makes sense
The scenario in the picture makes sense, what’s your issue with it? Why wouldn’t an object between us and the moon stay lit up on its right side when the sun is on its right?
The symptomology of heavy metal poisoning is indistinguishable from that of classical “mental retardation”.
Man no offense but who the fuck cares. This is a TD psyop or utterly unimportant, in either case, who the fuck cares.
I'm only here because...
Considering your prolific use of alts and your net total of zero non-bitching-about-axo posts, methinks you’re a lieing cuck
Dawww poor ZyklonBen’s alt, sad you got a timeout from not contributing? Can you point to a single high quality post by any of those cucks? Unlikely.
Yep and it’s mostly all at the request of that “Ragnar” power-user queer with 92,000 (!!!!!!) comment karma, and his fleet of alts.
I know for a fact he has atleast 6 accounts if not way more - he used them to flex (such a sad life) on me once by downvoting me on 6 different accounts within a minute of my posting (and not a single vote on it in the two days since lmao)
https://communities.win/c/Meta/p/12i3zDaR8A/x/c/