Let he who has ears, hear.
What do your silly little proclamations change about life? Nothing. Thus there is no need to be so beholden to them. It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Or maybe, get this, I was making the point for a reason, and when you get a big enough sphere the infinity of straight lines becomes more apparent.
I’m still not convinced you aren’t a shill. You hilariously reject magnetic pole reversals, which are well documented, as being untestable, but unironically spout the most inane FE links and buzz phrases (“space is fake”) without a shred of evidence.
A circle is made of infinitely many straight lines. This literally isn’t up for debate.
Anybody with even a slight amount of knowledge of geometry would disagree.
A circle is made up of infinitely many straight lines
(Sorry for the ping i think the joke was worth it though)
Oh wow in that case definitely watch this when you have a chance:
Now this is an interesting avenue of research. I’m assuming you’ve heard/read the work of Nassim Haramein? He had a popular documentary called Black WHOLE, which basically just is a quick explanation of his math/fundamental physics theories (which have a lot to do with toroidal fields)
Blah blah blah blah blah - another zionist shill who can’t say anything of substance.
Instead of making grand proclamations like “space is fake”, why not lay out your logic for reaching that conclusion. Then others can follow your logic and either strengthen it with parallel/supporting logic or counter it with critiques.
I’ve looked into FE, I think most people here will have atleast been exposed to it. It has some important aspects, such as valuing the scientific method above “trusting the experts”, and making sure you comprehend the foundational beliefs of the system of logic you’re operating from. But it is not a coherent world view, or atleast in all my time seeing people post about it, I’ve not seen it presented such that anything said was indisputable. It raises excellent questions, but its answers are lacking.
Thanks for confirming your status as a retarded zionist scum sucker
You brought up the second coming dude don’t act like such a faggot because someone ran with your comment and disagreed
The part where you try and link “the cabal” and “muslims” lol? If it’s not that zionist shilling then please spell it out for me because you’re not making sense, at all.
You keep regurgitating that line like it’s a pair of freshly shaved balls but you make no sense each time.
What have I misread?
Here is your statement, show me where you aren’t a racist faggot hypocrite please:
Or we could at least burn down every Muslim's house at the same time and the rest would go back to their sandbox to play.
You’re a fucking sperg loser dude. Keep hating muslims and sucking that kosher kock you’re a real patriot {not}
Shut up shill or make a real argument. You go back to your fallback catch-phrases when caught in obvious faggotry.
No I think it’s that u/syrian fag, serenade seemed to have an aloofness that this angry cripple could never imitate
Whereas we actually COULD kill everyone in the cabal, which actually is our enemy. Or we could at least burn down every Muslim's house at the same time and the rest would go back to their sandbox to play.
Holy fuck you’re so retarded it hurts.
“Quit blaming your problems on jews and blame them on moslems”
Literally fucking retarded. Or a zionist shill.
This guy is the joe rogan of tech billionaires.
I don’t know how to take that, coming from you, lmao
N8, ur b8 isn’t gr8, its gtng L8, no deb8, off to bed ingr8.
Rofl hey look another faggot with an alt to manipulate votes. I wonder if your intentions are genuine...kek
Now you’re changing the issue to “mandatory” vaccination. The topics being labeled “politics” aren’t about mandatory vaccination, for the most part. Almost nothing in America is “mandatory” not even ID so I don’t get what your point is. It’s the fucking Trump vaccine pal did you miss the last year and a half?
Interesting share (can you link the article too?)
But what conclusions do you draw from this? Why did you share it?
He really does seem contractually obliged to respond, unfortunately not obligated to respond with anything of substance.