Emasculation in Society
Social implies "aggregated body"; hence many held together by each ones spend resistance...that's what weakens aka deprives of masculine strength aka emasculates oneself.
what defines a man
Define implies affixed...male (motion) through female (momentum) into trans-form (matter) implies ongoing. Ones consent to a suggested definition (deaf phonetician) tempts one to hold onto it; hence affixing it within ones mind, while ignoring perceivable motion (phonetician; phonics; sound).
many mentors...
...yet only ones mind/memory.
size of a man
All moves (male); its momentum (female) implies the vault/world for each transformed matter within...the size of each implies one.
Sizing others tempts one to ignore self.
They want...
Few distract from perceivable need by suggesting many what they want or not want....for example suggested pluralism (they); tempting perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.
puts truth above emotions
Emotion implies "to move from"...holding up truth, while being (life) within motion (inception towards death) makes it harder for one to resist being moved.
Others suggest information (truth) and contradiction (lies) to tempt one to ignore inspiration (change) for desperately holding onto information, while fighting others within conflicts of reason over contradictions.
Instead of putting anything above...try rising (life) while falling (inception towards death).
I do not consent
Not implies nothing (Latin nihilo) aka suggested nihilism by others and ones consent to denial perceivable for it.
corporations raping the world
a) Corpus oration aka the language of death...life (perceivable sound) or death (suggested words).
b) RAPE, noun (Latin rapio, raptus; rap) - "a seizing and carrying away by force"...inception towards death implies being carried away within force; seizing anything implies ones free will of choice to want (hold onto) over need (letting go).
TEST; noun (Latin testor) - "to make a will"...taking a suggested test tempts one to ignore ones free will of choice.
a) Only nature does (to carry into effect); those within re-do aka respond as effects to being (life) done by cause (inception towards death).
b) Impression (inception towards death) generates expressions (life); which allows internal pressure to rise and fall.
c) Heart/Herz/Hertz implies frequency of resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
why cover up
Because many ignore reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested); which predisposes few to cover up reality with fiction.
a) Who's really trying to keep (I) while ignoring change (ayh)?
b) Instead aka IN (life) STEAD (inception towards death)...sounds like a changing position.
c) Energy...why else? What other cause can generate being?
control your decision making
a) Watching TV or listening to radio implies by ones free will of choice; hence permitting control over self to suggestions by another.
b) DECI'DE, verb - "to determine; to form a definite opinion; to come to a conclusion"...being implies in-between (life) introduction (inception) and conclusion (death); hence implicit; not definite.
Nature was perceivable before those within can suggest to each other what is (yes) or isn't (no)...ignoring former for latter tempts one into a conflict of reason (yes vs no).
Yes implies holding onto suggested information; no implies denying perceivable inspiration, while holding onto suggested.
Only within current (inception towards death) can there be alternation (life), and alternation implies sex within virgin current.
one truths protective layers
If one holds onto suggested information (truth); then one permits others to layer suggested contradictions (lies) upon it, and it's ones ignorance of perceivable (change) which protects this deception.
In other words...truth tempts one to hold onto; change cannot be held onto; ignoring this allows others to wield contradiction as lies.
the meaning of
ME'ANING, noun - "that which exists in the mind, view or contemplation as a settled aim or purpose, though not directly expressed"...this implies the self deception which tempts one to ignore expression (life) within direction (inception towards death).
Matter implies directly expressed within motion...meaning doesn't exist within reality; yet if one chooses to ignore reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested); then meaning was established within oneself.
a) If I were; she wouldn't be anymore.
b) Inception implies from pure (motion) into impure (matter).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...virgin (inception towards death) islands (life) or "Islands in the stream; that is what we are" by Dolly Parton and Kenny Rogers.
One cannot take virginity (loss) while being within it (growth) aka the impure cannot take/posses/hold onto purity.
Allegories like "loosing virginity" are suggested by few to many to distract from perceivable; misguide those living within the process of dying and tempt the majority to live in contradiction to nature.
disclose.tv...why would peasants celebrate?
To celebrate implies giving (consent)...doing it in response to a disclosure (suggestion) implies taking. Meanwhile in reality...celebration (perceivable) generates disclosure (perception); which becomes hidden knowledge if one ignores it for suggested.
bullying is illegal
If one consents to suggested laws (Latin legalis); then one permits another to define what's legal or illegal.
Ignoring to guard self tempts others to bully weaknesses.
a) Ideology implies suggested idealism and resulting logic/reason, hence placing self into a conflict of reason (liberal vs conservative) when consenting to suggested idealism.
The sides are irrelevant...it's choice at center that is being put off-balance, when consenting to either suggested side, and thereby into reason (imbalance).
b) Exposed implies position of expression...student under teacher implies position of self repression and suppression by another.
c) Suggested conservatism doesn't conserve; it spends ones resistance within conflicts of reason. Suggested liberalism doesn't liberate one; it binds ones free will of choice to a chosen ones suggested -ism.
Virgin implies "pure; free from mixture"...being implies impure (partial) within pure (whole), hence free to mix and thereby stain self or resist the temptation of admixture.
Also...virgin implies loss (inception towards death); sex implies growth (life) aka sex/seco - "to divide".
a) To believe implies ones consent/submission to the suggestions of another; which contradicts israel (Hebrew yisra'el) - "he that striveth with God" aka resisting perceivable.
b) Suggested "without" tempts one to ignore being (life) within (inception towards death).
c) Supporting another aka SUB (under) PORTARE (to carry) permits others to pass over one. Meanwhile...rise (life) within fall (inception towards death) needs to resist the wanted temptation to carry along/hold onto/burden self.
Suggested support (permitting others to pass over) tempts one to ignore perceivable...being (life) carried under the influence (inception towards death), while struggling to sustain self.
do you...being a jew
a) Hiding right under ones nose...YOU/JEW.
b) The foundation of "you" implies ones claim over self as "me; myself or I"; which brands everyone else as "you". That label you/jew is being used by chosen ones to subvert ones choice and as long as one claims me; one sustains you/jew. The perfect hiding place aka "rent free in your head".
to become so absolutely free
Coming (inception towards death) to be (life) implies as partial (free will of choice) within absolute (dominance of balance).
Free can only exist within dom aka free-dom...ignoring ones choice for chosen ones suggestion permits another to dominate one.
existence is an act
a) EX implies expression; hence expressed reaction (life) within impressing action (inception towards death).
b) Energy implies internal/inherent power, hence action (motion) generating internal/inherent power (momentum) for reactions (matter).
c) One cannot act (balance); only react (choice)...
The only way to deal
a) TO aka towards aka inception towards death implies only way for life.
b) THE aka suggested the-ism implies that one took (consent) a deal (suggestion) from another, while ignoring perceivable DEAL, verb - "to divide; to part; to separate" aka to be partial (perception) within whole (perceivable).
c) Only implies ONE aka energy (internal/inherent power) aka all for one, and one for all aka there can be only one aka ALL(in)ONE aka alone aka sole/soul aka SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken".
the only winning move is not to bet on either
a) The bet was made...not (Latin nihilo; nothing) aka suggested nihil-ism and ones consent to de-nial perceivable (everything) for suggested (nothing).
b) If it's "only"; then why do you divide it into winning vs losing?
The trick...whatever others suggest tempts one to want or not want aka agree or disagree aka believe or disbelief aka confirm or deny etc. Choosing either side tempts one into a conflict of reason (want versus not want; agree vs disagree etc.); while permitting those making the suggestions the control over both sides.
Choosing to want or not want suggested tempts one to ignore being want (life) within need (inception towards death) of perceivable. There's no conflict within perceivable, only underneath the spell of suggestion.
From a different perspective...choice can only exist within balance (need/want); choosing want over need imbalances (want vs not want) choice.
gets us to accept
One who accepts wants to get from another. Nature doesn't require acceptance...it inspires resistance (need); while tempting denial (want). Acceptance implies denial of resistance.
to destroy society
Society implies holding together; nature implies setting apart...others suggest society-ism (socialism) and community-ism (communism) to tempt many ones together, which in return permits few chosen ones to remain apart, while benefiting from the ongoing destruction.
overton
Being implies within the influence of sound, which in return vibrates fluid (inception towards death) into solids (life). Ignoring this by consenting to the suggestions from others, tempts one under the influence of their speech; words; musical sounds aka TONE.
In short...those who suggest become overtone for those who consent to stand under them. Consenting to suggested words puts one "under" a spell.
Window (aperture; opening)
Consent opens self to suggestions by others. If consent is used as ones window into the world; then one remains inside suggested information; while ignoring to go outside perceivable inspiration.
Charles H. (Chuck) Cassis is a Member with Goldberg Simpson. Goldberg Simpson, LLC is committed to fostering, cultivating, and preserving a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Our human capital is the most valuable asset we have. The collective sum of the individual differences...(aka tikkun olam; healing the world by bringing together).
reasons unknown
a) Reasoning about suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable/knowledge.
b) UN - "prefix of reversal, deprivation, or removal"...consenting to suggested reverses ones perception; deprives ones of sight within perceivable and distracts one from responding (re) to being moved (moval).
thoughts without a text-based filter
Suggested words within perceivable sound imply the text-based filter (letters) of spell-craft. One doesn't think in words until one consented to a suggested language (shaped by letters) aka to a filter by others for ones thoughts.
topics that may be controversial.
a) Controversial aka contra-versus aka control-verse...controlling others by suggested verses, while tempting them against one another within conflicts of reason.
b) Suggested information implies a topic upon the foundation of perceivable inspiration, hence all topics being controversial.
if we had a real chat it may lead somewhere
a) More words; less response-time for thought...leading to babel (confusion; disorder) aka babble (to prate; talk thoughtlessly).
b) Talk shows were suggested by few towards many to lead them to were they are now...
c) Being implies centered (perception) within everything (perceivable)...that's the only place to be. Others suggest "somewhere/anywhere else" to lure one off-center.
we all sound so arrogant on here
a) AR'ROGANCE, noun (Latin arrogo, to claim; desire) - "taking much upon one's self"...suggesting arrogance in the name of others implies ones desired claim.
b) Suggested "we all" implies an inversion of being one partial within all.
media sources
Media/medius/middle cannot be source...only surrounding can cause a middle. Being implies middle (life) of surrounding (inception towards death).
I do believe I have something to offer
a) Only nature offers (inception) and withdrawals (death) produce (life).
b) To believe implies buying into (consent) what others sell (suggestion), while ignoring to be offering (perception) within offer (perceivable).
open dialog
DIA (duo; two) LOG (logos; logic) confines ones free will of choice within a conflict of reason against other ones.
I am Canadian
a) F
b) CAN (to know) ADA (Hebrew adha; ornament) aka accessory to knowledge.
I am not omniscient
OMNI (all) SCIENT (knowledge)...being implies within all perceivable knowledge. Suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo, nothing) tempts one to de-nial perceivable for suggested.
I cannot know all
Only within all knowledge (perceivable) can one be (perception).
will I be able to
Being implies enabled to wield free "will" of choice.
food for thought
Suggested information implies appetite (want); perceivable inspiration implies hunger (need)...try letting thoughts starve a while.
more than 3 dimensions
a) DI (division) MENS (mind) ION (action)...there can only be one action; dividing itself into each ones reacting mind.
b) Try to apply "more than" to energy; motion; sound; light; nature....
human history
a) Hue (color) of man implies the visible spectrum of light for each ones sight within.
b) Consider if HE-BREW HIS-STORY to make JEW/YOU fall for it?
c) Nature isn't storing; it deposits (life) while consuming (inception towards death).
Others suggest deposit as "a place for safe-keeping", as to distract one from DE (separation) POSIT (position) aka a separation of temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
In short...safe implies "free from danger"; being implies "free within danger".
SorosRothschildBloombergistan
Wallenberg... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raoul_Wallenberg + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallenberg_family ...The family motto is "Esse, non Videri" (Latin for "to be, not to be seen")
Sweden
From SWEON/SWEBA - "free; independent"...only within dependence to balance can one be free will of choice.
Hence the struggle to communicate hidden knowledge to those hiding from it...