Problem is not in whateverG. Problem is in uplinks from base stations. Large cities does not have enough bandwidth between stations and internet to properly serve a lot of clients. Small cities have less cliens, so uplinks are not so overloaded.

Cellular network is not just your phone and some abstract Google or Apple services. It is a multilayer system with many bottlenecks and places where something could go wrong. 5G/4G/xG is only tiny part of it and not the one that exclusively define overall performance.

Changing oldG to newG will change absolutely nothing for user without respective rebuilding of other layers nobody bother about since 3G introduction.

There is some kind of mistery with terrestrial networking in US/Canada. I don't see a single technical problems with laying fiber to every single household at all. But AFAIK from a lot of conversations with US and Canada fellows, this assumed as something unreal or insanely expensive. So, there is something else, like some hidden state regulations or whatever with prohibition level of conditions.

Whatever, all in all, looks terrestrial networking is prohibited in North America for some reason.

So, space interent delivery looks pretty reasonable from the business point of view.

Rollout of "space cellular base stations" really looks like failure with initial Starlink approach. IDK, wrong selection of RF band, or underdeveloped communication/tracking protocol, whatever, but Starlink didn't gave expected results. So, there is "plan B". Practically, cellular bands have much better penetration through atmosphere than Starlink 12/40GHz band.

Not really. It is a very probable and real danger, but by completely another reasons.

Shortly, the only difference of 5G in comparison with previous cellular network generations is enhanced bandwidth between user device and base station. However, today even 3G bandwidth is not utilised fully, because of absense of wide enough uplinks from base staions to network backbone, not even speaking about 4G and 5G. So, there is no any need for enhanced bandwidth for consumers, it can't be ultilised by customers because of narrow uplinks. But there is perfect reason for much higher bandwith between user device and base station for total surveillance agenda. As I see how it is implemented - every 5G base station have local temporary storage of surveillance data. High-bandwith constant surveillance streams from all end-user devices stored locally on base stations. If surveillance state need an access to that surveillance data of specific person, it just download corresponding records from base station. It is perfect scheme of total surveillance system. No need for any centralized storage for insane amount of data or giant network of high-bandwith uplinks to every base station. It is also highly distributed, so very reliable. Only thing needed comparing to 3G/4G is higher bandwidth between user device and base station and some not very large storage at base station.

All that bullshit about "5G is harmful" or "5G is a weapon" is to distract those who suspect something weird about 5G from the aforementioned real 5G threat for people. Pretty traditional move of TPTB - to pose those who try to ask reasonable questions as insane lunatics who spread bullshit that could be easily debunked, created on purpose by TPTB puppets and pushed to every single alt-media.

Suddenly, aviation fuel had to conform to ICAO standards and engine manufacturer specifications. Specifications determine fuel composition. Regardless of fuel source same engine will produce exactly same amount of CO2 for a fuel that conform said specifications and so have exactly same composition.

This insane bullshit that "sustainable" "biofuel" produce less CO2 is total bullshit since the very beginning. Highly probably, it produces more CO2 than "fossil fuel", because you need more energy to grow and process any "biofuel" than to make normal fuel from oil.

So, biofuel is 100% bullshit from that shitty "carbon footprint" point of view. However, it is somewhat interesting in terms of personal independence if you have enough land to grow oily plants and in terms producing as much CO2 as possible to make our planet green again. And may be finally kill all that reptiloids who could not survive CO2 levels of 1000-2000 ppm normal for Earth

So, let them do it. Greenhouse gases level on Earth have to be raised to normal levels at any cost and as soon as possible. Even tiny rise could be deadly for the TPTB, that is why they so obsessed with all that "carbon footprint" madness. But they are too stupid to take everything in account.

My old post about possible connection of CO2 levels and TPTB survival - https://conspiracies.win/p/15IEhESYAY/theory-why-everything-is-turning/ :)

Pretty good proof that this idiots have no any clue about crypto and will fuck themselves up with crypto.

Crypto is not a fucking asset. And never was. It is a mean of exchange.

See the one thing missing from all the conversations about crypto is --> what it is making?

It produce impossibility of any government or cabal to prevent or intervene transaction.

May be that was not a big thing few years ago, but today even me personally feel that benefit of crypto that make it even more valuable for me. That is how crypto value created.

Also, users could make profit supporting crypto backbone, kind of equivalent to the share in Federal Reserve with dividents from printing money, IDK.

Now the common story is "proof of work"

No. "proof of work" is not what create crypto value. It is what make it uncounterfeitable.

There are several features that means oа exchange must have - it sould be accepted by all participants, it should have some value, and so on. "Proof of work" make first feature. Unstoppability of transaction makes second. And so on.

The fact that it was allowed to fork was like open sourcing a video game to let users find bugs or offer modifications.

That was one of TPTB fuckups with crypto. Opensourcing means loss of control over project. When you have full access to source code, you could change absolutely anything, including any ties to initial author undercover intentions.

The public was doing the work of beta testing

Public always do the work of beta testing. Literally always, even in case of very expensive software, I would say especially in case of very expensive software, when customer already spent huge amount of money and have no any choice other than to continue use that expensive shit. But in case of crypto, users is able to even get some payment for that job.

and conditioning their own slavery.

How exactly crypto "condition user slavery"? Do you have an example of some another means of exchange that have less limitations and better anti-government protection than crypto?

I find crypto practically useful as means of exchange for some cases and honestly don't see anything problematic with it.

Your reasoning that crypto is kind of conditioning for coming CBDC is pretty off, because real crypto users understand how it works and what properties it have, so they will never confuse it with CBDC or something else. Those who don't understand what crypto is, just could not and will not see any difference from CBDC or any other digital money like bank cards or whatever other form. Even without crypto existence they will easily fall to CBDC of whatever shit will be declared fashionable, like NFT or stocks or not-a-vaccines or IOS/Android anal probes. They don't care, and don't want to know anything about anything. Why the hell should I care about that sheeple and their choices of yoke they want?

PS: Please consider that under "crypto" in my reasoning I mean independent crypto like BTC or XMR, not shitcoins like ETH f.e.

BTC is by principle is deflationary currency. And bankers hate anything deflationary, since it does not generate as much profit for them as inflationary fiat. Then why bankers created fundamentally deflationary currency, when it is perfectly possible to create inflationary crypto with all same features as deflationary one?

I think even if crypto is some TPTB creature, it is a project that suddenly and unexpectedly for TPTB went out of control. Like internet or satcom.

And when mass-production nearly reached that single-junction limit, they began to produce some overcompicated multi-junction cells with purely symbolic efficiency adavantage, but with enormous price tag. In normal world nobody will pay 3-10 times more for some 1% of efficiency, especially taking in account reliability question.

But here we are. Marketing wins over common sense.

you're asserting A => B

I'm asseritng A <=> B. It is circular dependency. There is no any real need nor in bloatware, nor in hardware that could sustain it.

As for your numbers, you miss the point. Little decline or little rise of sales speak nothing about huge constant flow of unnecessary hardware to replace perfectly working one. This fluctuations perfectly explained by overall economy health.

If software is good enough to not force customers to upgrade constantly, this flow will be magnitude orders lower then we have now. Only to replace few suddenly broken or add a few to existing thousands. The sole fact that corporate PC sales exist at current levels is already a proof of artificially created demand. And fluctuations at few percent level does not change anything.

Market with artificially created demand could never be saturated. At the same time fair market, where demand is obviously limited quickly saturates and then fall with only supportive (or spare parts) sales.

There exists markets where constant demand is inevitable - it is energy, food, water and other consumable things. Computer tech, just like cars, home appliances and so on is not consumable by default. Humans do not chew PCs and drink cars to live. This things could last centuries, without any need to replace if designed properly.

You could easily find examples of such non-consumable tech in industry. F.e. decently serviced during its lifetime 70 years old lathe absolutely don't need replacement and not worse than lathe you could buy today. Sometimes it is even better than modern one. There are still a lot of half-century old (or even older) tech in industry that perfectly do its job. I don't see any reason why computer tech of last decade should be any different. Moore's law turn out to be a hoax. There is already nothing that could be improved in current computer architecture, that could noticeably rise its consumer usefulness. That was a thing in 90s, but not now. I estimate that optimum was reached around decade ago, everything we see since then is a pure creation of artificial demand from absolutely nothing.

Yeah, dude 80% of shit is what I call "innovation, for the sake of innovation".

And looks like the rest 20% is "changes for the sake of changes".

The fork has been unchanged for 4000 years

Every problem always have optimal solution. It's like a hill-like curve with a top where solution is good enough to completely solve the problem and is not complex enough to be unreliable. If that top point is reached, then there are almost nothing could be done to make things better. Only way to change things is to invent a completely new physical principle, tech or whatever, but that is exactly what nobody does. Since perfect solution, i.e. top of the curve is already reached, any change or innovation inevitable lead to worse result. And here they need marketing to convince customers that worse solution is better.

Interesting, if we somehow stole internal financial data from corporations, what difference between financing of R&D and marketing will we find? I think today its orders of magnitude difference and not in the favor of R&D.

And here is next obvious question - how long this scam could last? Should there be point when this situation will explode with following return to normal when R&D is much more important than marketing, or it will eventually stuck at the bottom of making useless and unreliable things with total customer brainwashing to make them happy with this crap?

Didn't saw any chips at all. Dude shows empty phone case without PCB. What's the point? Is it kind of joke?

Even with PCB it will be hard to distinguish, say, Qualcomm Snapdragon X24 (with 4G) from Snapdragon X50 (with 5G) ICs f.e. they have pretty similar BGA package. Macro footage with IC marking needed to tell anything about internals of modern phone. And that's in case SDR approach is not used, when list of supported standards depends on firmware and not on the IC model.

Unless you're doing gaming

Gaming is largely financed by Intel, Nvidia, AMD and so on. That thing with "Guys, this is first engineering samples of our latest videocard, your new game should lag and show low FPS on that hardware" is what I personally saw (and participated, guilty :) ) already in late 90s. Still have that 3D accelerator ("GPU" was not a common term at the time) card with "Not for sale. Not FCC approved" markings on PCB as kind of museum artifact. Today it is not just occasional donating fresh hardware samples with some one-time financial grants, but also a constant direct money flow from hardware manufacturers to game developers.

I'm pretty shure that all modern games could be optimized for flawless gameplay on the decade old hardware without any serious efforts.

Total collapse of Jewish chutzpah as whole. From fall of holohoax, usury swindle and fiat not-a-money to discovery that religious Jewish human sacrifices is an undeniable fact.

I block advertising and troll spammers, works perfectly for me.

There could be little bugs with showing only few items on "NEW" page right after blocking and reloading page, but everything becomes fine after Ctrl+Shit+R full page reload.

To see that blocking works, you need to reload page. Preferrably with Ctrl+Shift+R, to avoid aforementioned bug.

But they've gotten rid of the buried tires entirely– too many see it as a urinal.

Here nearby bushes used for this in case of emergency. Widely spreaded rumor is that you could be arrested as paedofile with all consequences if you pull your dick out on child playground. :) Never heard about real cases, really, but looks like shitting and peeing on playgrounds by drunks, children or stupid parents, which existed in late USSR / early RF is completely defeated now.

And at least peeing in bushes is even somewhat useful for bushes as fertiliser, unlike for playground structures. :)

IDK, but may be it is better to add a short howto about using block button for new users. In such way, new user will be able to block garbage and began to use this place normally.

Since you don't have full access to forum engine, you don't have enough instruments to effectively block influx of liberal and Israel trolls here. However, regular users have a tool to clean up things, just not aware of it at start. IDK, if even list of most blocked users is available for mods here.

Just wrote something like "we are under constant attack of hasbara/liberal/woke trolls, so please use blocking features of forum to keep things clean for yourself. You use block feature in this way ....".

So instead of spending money to make the life of the citizens better, Russia wastes uncounted billions on a senseless war in Ukraine.

There are absolutely no any need in spending more money on infrastructure. There are more than enough money and resources to make everything perfect. Problem is purely in the corruption and incompetence of bureaucrats.

As for Ukraine, you could easily find out the state of ex-USSR infrastructure in Ukraine, Nothing was build, repaired or replaced at all since USSR fall, even in large towns like Kiev or Kharkov. It really makes people of new Russian regions wonder "fuck, we didn't know that it could be that way!" and "why didn't we join Russia much earlier?"

Honestly, I don't think that severe cold is something usual for Texas, so it is pretty obvious that such disaster will create a lot of shit for unprepared population and infrastructure, including attempts to make money from people's problems. So Texas example is not a good analogy.

Things that happen regulary, should not produce any problems, in perfect world. But in this clown world it is impossible, regardless of country or political system. :)

If you want accurate analogy to severe winter cold incidents in Central Russia, try Florida with seasonal hurricanes. And something tells me that there is no much difference in the roots of that eternal seasonal fuckups.

Yes, that used tires playground art is pretty common here. :)

In last decade there is kind of next step of using old tires - they crunched into tiny bits and playground floor made from that rubber powder mixed with some binder. But whole tractor/track tires things are still part of design. :)

I think life of ordinary people in same climate could not differ a lot, since basic needs are the same. Climate dictate way of life much more than politics or whatever shit.

From the other side, if MSM will honestly describe life in other countries everybody will quickly find that there is no any significant difference between people at all. So, it will be very hard to push all that political shit and sow hatred which fuel state power and elites profits.

At the same time, Internet allowed p2p communication and today there is no any problem to find out how things going on the other side of planet and that they are not very different from ones daily life. That is why MSM propaganda become completely ridiculous to sharpen any real differences and create non-existing ones.

Pretty regular thing here. :) Every time when suddenly we have below -30°C in winter, something happens everywhere. Pipes cracks, electric grid overloads and so on, Have nothing to do with fuel, really, but everything to do with corruption of local bureaucrats stealing money from infrastructure projects.This winter I had to start generator only twice, which is pretty low figure, really. Of course, those bureaucrats, who was in charge kind of punished or dismissed or moved to another position, but everything goes the same year by year. :)

It's funny, but "heating failures" in towns are not hardest problems or whatever. They fixed pretty fast, and relatively rare - once or twice a year only at severe temperatures. The main winter problem is when suddenly snow falls on the roads. In winter, yes. And always it is suddenly and none of bureaucrats ever prepared for snowfall and all that stuff. THAT is Russian winter disaster not that "heating failures". :) But seems nobody in the West want to know about that fact.

As usual, western MSM know absolutely nothing about Russia and our local problems. :)

As for "frozen West" - it is kind of funny. That Russian "heating failures" is how most of Nothern Europe lives every single winter for centuries. In Russia, +20-23°С in every single indoor square meter is a must. If temperature drops to +18°C or below in any indoor facility of apartment it is accounted as "heating failure", officially, and bureaucrats are punished if they allowed things reach that point. At the same time, in Europe it is normal to keep warm only living rooms. Idiocy, inability, greed, stupid engineering tradition or whatever. Long before any current European problems with fuel. So, Russian "heating failure" is just a standard situation accounted as normal for any European household. :)

PS: And I think it will be very entertaining to see what happens if -30°C temperature will suddenly fall on London or NY. :) One of the funniest Hollywood comedy I saw was "The Day After Tomorrow". :)

People always begin to "create their own money", when official money stops to carry out their function for people. Regardless of what government or banks think about it.

As for current BTC gov idiocy, I think we will see yet another TPTB fuckup soon. That arrogant and ignorant idiots push their snout in the things they have no any clue about. They think they will be able to control exchange rate of BTC just like they totally control all stocks, treasures and paper gold via spectacle with all that NASDAQ, NYSE and other stupid circuses.

As far as I know, crypto crowd has kind of common intention to abandon BTC and switch to XMR or other independent crypto as soon as there will be clear signs of government manipulation. Also, blockchain split is possible.

Trick is in the math of BTC. Currently, miners get profit from transactions. Most transactions are small transfers. "Official" BTC exchanges does not generate any transactions profitable for miners, all that huge BTC "trade" happens internally, without any records in blockchain, so without any profit for miners. I 100% shure that idiots from gov will try to do exactly same thing - their "big" and "serious" "trading" will generate ZERO income for miners. Those who really use BTC, through transactions, will easily abandon BTC in case of any signs of control or manipulation. Despite their transactions are tiny in total, comparing with exchange turnover, only this real transactions make BTC alive. As all that small real transactions disappear, there will be no any reason for miners to keep BTC blockchain running. They will switch to another coins where real people transactions happens. And all that stock circuses will find themselves with digits on accounts that is completely sensless, since there will be no any backbone of miners and real transactions. Even if state will buld their own mining farms, there will be no real transactions to profit that mining farms eating hell tons of electric power. Also, it will be self-unwinding fuckup, since less real transactions will mean longer confirmation times, and longer confirmation times will force other real users to abandon BTC, so lowering transaction rate even more. When real transaction will take weeks even with large transaction fee, there will be no real users for such coin.

Bankers, traders and gov understand absolutely nothing about crypto as concept that made crypto popular. Their brains that work in realm of assets, fiat and stock circus just could not imagine that there could be something else. So they will fuck themselves up with their stupid speculation approach to the thing that is completely different and based on completely different principles. Or, they will be fucked by the crowd. Whatever happens first.

In any case it will be hillarious. Just watch. :)

It is much easier to name those few western enterpreneurs who made their wealth in ethically apropriate way, making useful things and had no any ties with jews. Something like Henry Ford, Carl Benz and few others.

Unfortunately, all their enterprises was eventually hijacked by bankers and turned into faceless crap producing corporations.

If you could not live without mobile and all tech you use including cars and planes depend on Internet connection, you already not survived.

There is a "block" button under every post and comment for you. If he make your frontpage unpleasant for you, just click it and forget about him.

Also, not everybody had to burn all their life in a sensless race for money and paying debts. Imagine that.

If you are looking for paid shills - look for those who copypaste shitty videos and memes and then deny to discuss them. This posters are clearly not interested in what they repost, so assumption that they are paid for that is much more valid then in case of pkvi with all his weirdness. Pkvi is very interested, I would say obsessed with the things he continously post. And most of his posts are some original and fresh sources, not some reposts of third-party content.

Pkvi produce conspiracy theories content by himself. May be not very cool and interesting for everybody, but he at least do it. I think today, in the time of endless copypasting this should be at least respected, whether you like it or not.

The best thing you could do is to begin create your own content. Not copypasting someone else memes and videos, but, f.e. finding MSM fuckups and shit that support your own conspiracy theory you like.

I think things you mentioned, and all so-called "closing inventions" is the most strictly prohibited things to research, really. This taboo is the main reason there is no any real AI development, meanwhile. Real AI will inevitably will figure out a tons of such inventions, just by sorting out combinations of physical effects and phenomenons that was never studied by humans.

Also, it is impossible to keep any realised, working invention in secret long enough to gain any stable supremacy. As soon as it become known that something is possible, it is just a matter of time when it will be replicated. And in case of really important "closing inventions" nobody will give a fuck about IP rights or patents. That's the nature of science.

Even if TPTB dream to have some "superior technology", they could not afford it or allow its develoment even for themselves, as it will quickly bury them all.