That's a great compilation. I was looking for a page like this.
Interesting turn-about, predicted by people online who said there was no way to do this legally. It makes you wonder how much of what they say is going to happen, is simply said to manipulate you into getting the shot of your own volition.
For the moon landings I've too many sources! Not one particular book though, probably the best intro is the recent documentary, American Moon which does a good job of summing up some of the best arguments that have developed over the years from various sources. The writer director is a professional photographer so there is a big focus on the photographic documentation.
The book I recommended is short and well written, and even amusing. Personally I don't recommend any other sources, since I've seen this topic handled badly.
I can't really sum up the arguments made in a short comment. The argument that is well presented is that, in fact, controlled, instantaneous, explosive nuclear fission is not physically possible; which explains why it has not been done since it was faked in Japan.
A bit like the moon landings.
Any attempt at doing nuclear bombs how they say those bombs work, would result in the thing melting in an awful nuclear mess (think the "elephants foot" in Chernobyl), rather than exploding and vaporizing everything around it. Deadly, but not explosive. There are explosive triggers in nukes, but they are TNT or similar, not nuclear material.
The photographs of Nagasaki and Hiroshima support this. There are concrete and brick structures (and even trees) still standing at ground zero. They just look like they have been burned.
Nagasaki and Hiroshima were firebombed with napalm and mustard gas (like Dresden) over a period of time. America already had control of Japan for a year prior to the day they say they dropped the bombs. They chose two fairly inconsequential cities, which they had already destroyed, to be 'nuked'.
It may sound ridiculous, but then so does the moon landing hoax to those who have never looked into with an open mind.
I'm way more skeptical about nukes than I am about thermite and a directed energy weapon such as the evidence presented by Judy Wood and others supports; there is no way thermite alone could have resulted in the kinds of anomalous destruction we see with the WTC1 & 2. WTC7 looks more conventional.
If anyone is open to examining the hidden (un)reality of nuclear weapons, I reccommend Akio Nakatani's book "Death Object: Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax" which is on Libgen and Archive.org.
The fake shake of the image on the left is a classic trick to hide bad editing. The real video is the more stable shot on the right with the "plane", whatever it is.
Usually this gif is shown without the comparison video, and there is another one too. The poster usually says this was the real video that got leaked, and the versions with the planes have been edited. I believe is a dis-info campaign, to discredit those who question the impossible physics of the planes, and re-enforce the now thoroughly debunked and discredited idea from September Clues that all the videos with planes have been edited.
There is also a similar misinfo gif of charges exploding in WTC7 - again, edited in and portrayed as rare leaked footage.
Nice idea for a script! I looked it up, it's low budget and got slated; but of course, given it sounds like it's overtly challenging the current paradigm. BTW it's "2149: The Aftermath". It looks as good as an episode of any scifi tv show.
Those side effects will be listed on the vaccine manufacturers insert as well. You'd be surprised how many pharmaceuticals have "death" listed as a possible "side effect" on their inserts.
And especially with vaccines it's an important a legal thing (for the manufacturers). With the vaccine manufacturer immunity laws, the only possible way for them to be sued for an adverse reaction of any kind, is if the reaction was NOT listed on the insert as a "side effect" AND it can be proven without a shadow of doubt that the unlisted reaction was caused by the vaccine.
When the mod deleted my post a message showed up (for everyone other than me) saying I deleted it
There is no option to do that in the mod tools. If we delete something it just says "comment deleted'. Unless something has changed with the new website. But I'm using the new one and the mod tools are the same as the old as far as I can see.
As to when a mod deletes a comment and you can still see it but no one else can - that was the same on reddit. I agree it sucks. That's why some bright spark made that reveddit extension that notified you when it happened. Maybe we'll have something like that here one day.
I ask because I've seen you cry shadowban before, I believe. At that time it was also explained to you that mods can't shadow ban. Just ban, either permanently or with a time period. So it's either a glitch, or you deleted it yourself.
muh variant
Well, apparently The Mossad can assassinate someone and make it look like pneumonia:
Doctors pulled Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal out of respiratory collapse with the opioid antidote naloxone after Mossad agents sprayed a substance believed to be a form of fentanyl in his ear in a botched 1997 assassination attempt. “Israeli officials have indicated that Mossad has used fentanyl in other operations, which they declined to describe, noting that it had a ‘100 per cent success rate,”‘ according to a Jane’s Intelligence Review report from January 1998.
Not mentioned there, but I think former mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky said in his tell-all book "By Way Of Deception" that the doctors themselves did not know about the fentanyl. They thought it was pneumonia. But after a set of circumstances... I forget the exact details, but the Mossad was forced by the Israeli Prime Minister (to avoid an "international incident") to tell the doctors how to cure Mashaal.
James Corbett just put out a video about what's going on with the scandemic in Japan, and he covers the Ivermectin thing:
Read this document a few years ago - here's the original:
https://astroengineer.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/a-curiosity-of-spirit-full-document/
It's an engrossing read. quite long, like a short novella really. Originally posted to ATS forum where the author was ridiculed. The author, a contractor engineer for NASA, believes that NASA has secret FTL communication technology on their curiosity rover. He and another engineer slowly but surely, through an interesting process of deduction, discover a secret radio device on the rover that's not in any documentation.
He never once considers that it might be a con and the reason they get the images so quickly from Mars is that the rover is actually on earth. But the journey to him discovering the radio is very interesting and he also determines that images are removed and/or edited before the rover team receives them, who believe they are receiving them first directly from mars.
It's a great example of how cons can be done and the people, who normies always argue would have to know, simply have no fucking clue.
read the article quoted: https://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/winter-2019/intolerable-genius-berkeleys-most-controversial-nobel-laureate
It's a hit piece. It's literally "now that he's dead, lets talk about what annoying shit he was..."
the comments are great:
If you want to discredit Mullis wouldn’t it be more effective to simply name the study upon which Gallo based his assertion that HIV is the cause of AIDS? Tell us the publication, date & author.
A grubby hit-piece on a man now dead who cannot defend himself.
Labeling someone a denialist is nothing short of a personal attack. If I wanted to be insulting, I’d call Coby McDonald a two bit media hack, but I’m so much better than that, believe me… And perhaps Coby could follow up and prove his point by addressing the mysterious paper by Robert Gallo no one can seem to find that proved beyond a reasonable doubt HIV is the cause of AIDS. Take your time. What’s another week compared to the over three decades of absentia.
I notice that when you google his name, the second auto complete option is "...cause of death" indicating that many people have searched that.
Have you read "The Parasite Pill":
https://files.catbox.moe/9rbtxh.pdf
Written by a voat user (i never found out the username). High effort, worth a flick through.
anon says:
Its a massive electromagnetic anomaly that appeared over Central Mexico, it was confirmed to not be due to radar error, but what exactly it was remains a mystery. Could have even been some sort of strange solar-flare like emission or some sort of GCR, but no one knows, and the amount of shilling at the time seems to suggest it was something that the powers that be did not want us to know about.
the anomaly on another service:
https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1599009426800.webm
/pol/ thread from back then with more discussion and images and screen shots etc:
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/275669641/
I've yet to see any explanation of this other than someone speculating that since it appeared on 3 separate weather services, it is likely related to a single satellite that they get their info from...
The reddit thread where the discovery was announced:
https://www.reddit.com/r/masskillers/comments/pn7n0q/adam_lanzas_youtube_channel/
A /pol/ thread about it:
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/338909823