Except that you don't know why for any of those things. For example during the moon landings the camera settings used would not have registered the stars on film. So technically that aspect of the photographs was accurate. But it's pointless bringing them up because those cameras shouldn't have operated at those temps on the moons surface anyway. And the film would have been destroyed by temps and radiation. So talking about stars is pointless.
I am (safely) presuming on artemis they're not using a film camera. They use some type of digital censor. So then we have a different story, and that needs to be adressed. It probably should not function in space either, due to radiation / temperatures or other reasons. So then all the content we see is probably fake.
But you haven't made that determination based on the content of the image. You simply haven't demonstrated know how the image should look. Whoever potentially faked it probably knows much more than you how it should look, and that's is why they have made it look as it does.
What kind of camera is supposed to be on the Artemis? How big is the aperture? Would the brightness of the earth require the lens to be open to such an extent that the over-exposure would erase the stars? Should stars have registered on that cameras sensor at the settings that were used? Have you taken a still from the footage and fiddled with the exposure levels to check that the stars are not there in the darkness of the footage? No, you simply assume you should be able to see certain things clearly without addressing such technical matters and more.
How long was the original footage, how much time elapses in the video actually? Is it true that we would see visible movement of the earth and the shadow in this amount of time? None of that is addressed by that man's ramblings.
Don't think i'm arguing the video is not fake, it probably is, but nothing but conjecture is offered as "proof". And certainly nothing shown proves the earth is flat. I'd like to see the original video and a discussion of such matters instead of some guy and his low effort ramblings.
We do absolutely nothing to censor or control FE posts here. They are simply unpopular. For example, this OP video is just low quality pointless rambling. He points out zero evidence - just states "this is fake". Better had OP posted the sped up footage itself, and add a title "this looks fake" - that would be a better post.
stay on Q
lol
I do not care what "flys" and doesn't with you.
Demanding users be banned is not going to get them banned. It might get you banned though, if you keep doing it.
Removing both of these spam comments.
Space both exists and doesn't exist, amirite? Like Schrodinger's space cat.
I remember when we asked about this before and a significant proportion of users thought we should have no styling at all. A blank forum with no graphic? It seemed a bit lazy, and might turn more people off than a graphic would repel. Also this guy made this fairly high quality graphic for free.
Yes, does seem to load faster.
Statue of Liberty is a tranny
He's remembering how his trip to space wasn't positive at all. It destroyed his life and turned him to drug abuse and alcoholism. Almost like it was all just a bad, psychosis induced dream...
I couldn't find independent corroboration of his death. I heard about him through 4chan. It's not a totally unique name, he was in his early 20's, and was fairly unknown, so it's a challenge. Renegade Tribune republished his tuff at the time, and even they couldn't confirm much. The guy just disappeared offline.
There was a recent book alleging major changes among masonic orders in recent decades, especially in Europe. The book was written in Italian and has not been fully translated, but you can find abridged notes in English online. No publisher wishes to publish in English yet apparently. The author claims to be a former mason and details the fracturing of Masonic orders in recent decades into new, somewhat undocumented orders (at least in public) - one major change is that all the new orders allow women. Nothing has been confirmed outside of the one book though. The author is Gioele Magaldi and the book is "Massoni".
I read a book. Search Jabulon and you'll find some stuff about it. It was apparently a secret until a young British journalist called Stephan / Steven Knight discovered it (while researching about Jack The Ripper, a Freemasonic Hoax) and then wrote a book about Freemasonry. He managed to land interviews with some top masons and mentioned the name - and they all froze in shock in the same way. A little while later Knight died young from an aggressive form of brain cancer.
The link is to his channel, not a video. If it doesn't work, here is the hyper link:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/WWGUnuEee116/
The last video is at the top of the list, and is well worth your time. In light of Musk's recent condemnation of Jones, and Rogans past support of Jones, it's very interesting to see how these guys are connected. North shows how Rogan's podcast was secretly sponsored by Musk / Tesla Motors, among other things. Could his revelations about this seeming tag team of controlled opposition be behind his untimely death?
As I understand it they invented their own entity to worship, called Jabulon, but that knowledge was only available to high degrees. The lower degrees functioned under the illusion that the higher power was the same god as Christians, and treated Hyram Abiff as a kind of saint/messiah type person. This was the case as recently as the 80's/90's in UK, the ancestral home of Freemasonry.
The Flat Earth label at the beginning of the video.
This documentary is called "What Happened On The Moon?" - but your link has a splash logo at the beginning saying "Flat Earth - Apollo Landing Fully Exposed" and the description on the youtube page just says "Moon Hoax Doc Complete" - and that's it. No other information.
The first approx 3 mins of the original documentary, the title sequence, has been cut completely, and replaced by that logo.
The channel provides no indication where the documentary came from, nor who made it.
It was made in 2000 by David Percy and Mary Bennett of aulis.com
WTF with the big fat fucking flat earth label?
The makers of this film run the website aulis.com, the best website on the moon landing/Apollo Missions hoax, and they are certainly not flat earthers.
The introduction to their film at this link has been cut, and a flat earth logo slapped on it. Very bad form.
Here is a link to original film on their own website, with their own introduction intact:
What kind of accent is that? Seems all over the place.
noted. Since the user posted a fake tweet with intention to troll I gave a 3 day ban.
This twitter user doesn't even exist, as far as I am able to discern. Got a link?
Everyone knows the Ancient Greeks were gay right? How has this lie seemingly permeated the minds of everyone in society? I think this is just one instance, one I happen to feel strongly about, of people writ large allowing themselves to be taken in by a story, without considering whether or not it may actually be true. I made this video to do my small part to correct this error, and defend the men who I view as the progenitors of much of western society. I hope it can serve as a reminder to you going forward that vigilance paid towards such lies is the only way to keep them from spreading and doing their harm.
How do you know the movement of the shadow would register at that distance and resolution over the period of time the video lasts? How far away is that shot supposed to be from? You simply don't know what it should look like at all. Everything is assumption.