OMH u/free-will-of-choice answering with understandable text.
Darwinism of course was never proved: The fittest survive. What is meant by the fittest? Not the strongest; not the cleverest—Weakness and stupidity everywhere survive. There is no way of determining fitness except in that a thing does survive. “Fitness,” then, is only another name for “survival.” Darwinisn: That survivors survive.
What a nonsence. All fitting to environment survive. Or rather more clearly:
those who not fit to their environment too much do not survive enough to have offspring.
Truism so.But big one. This is really Darwin's theory.
"Survival of the fittest" is vulgar and wrong interpretation by half-brain calvinists for whom that was scientific confirmation of their "supremacy".
It is the same like human ancestor being monkey.
It is not.Common ancestor who could be called monkey (and who said evolution wasn't tool of God who is REASON to create another sentient reason at his image). What is also forgotten but was from ancient times known to ancient "primitive" nations - we share much with all other life,all animals and even maybe plants.
u/RandomAnon78 : BMJ is british medical journal. Are we sure it is truth ? it is published by the trade union the British Medical Association
They still want enough slaves to live comfortably on their yachts.
They need people who are smart enough to push buttons at the factory, but not smart enough to overthrow them.
They still want World Class restaurants where they can go eat, they just don't want there to be any waiting when they arrive.
Looks logically however their behaviour is not logical a bit. All they needed to do is accelerating a bit existing tendencies in first world and cull third world (Africa,China,India,South America). Instead they chose so radical solution targeting first world. This people are not logical,they are crazy fanatics wanting to treat people like u/Taliban says:
everyone else will be lambs to the slaughter.
To keep all technological level we have you need smartest ones,otherwise all will start collapsing and after re-normalisation you could end at best 100 years backward living in some kind of Mad Max like society. Of course people could survive and adapt to such conditions but level of life will drop dramatically. They are clearly crazy and dumb so.
Your ability to hoard food, create food and get away with it, as well as your ability to conceal yourself from the Big Tech death lists matters more. permalink parent save report block reply
Without having gun it all will be taken by those who have guns.
your ability to conceal yourself from the Big Tech
In long term it will be impossible. The only chance is resistance.
In other words we're dependant on a more fragile system (think single point of failure). We have allowed the "System" to control the essentials necessary to survive.
Don't be a pussy.
Indeed those game animation it is "predictive programming" - to scare you. In case you live in big city yes,you could be in shit if you wouldn't be prepared. But the fact is even in cities people were surviving wars.
Of course those who will not adapt and overcome will not survive.
You can't do this, you fall. No amount of brute firepower saves you.
Maybe yes,but if it will have a chance to save the others I accept that.
People now do NOT have such degrees of power.
Without people they are nobodies and nothing. If you are rather ready to die than to serve them they already lost this way or another.
SHTF in the same way I described, there will be all sorts of militarymen and police patrolling the Streets as you described in the first paragraph, and a majority of the masses will be paralyzed in fear.
Who cares about majority then.Paralysed will follow after some time.
This is not 3000BC where Chinese peasant farmers can topple tyrannical emperors and build a proper regime out of the ashes
Chinese are not white,Chinese by their culture are mostly obedient sheeps without individuality and dignity. Poor people,almost all their history is being slaves with only masters being changed...
away from YOUR annihilation
hahahaha let's say yes - so ? If they will escalate who cares about such "live". If it will fail then it will fail.
You are not gunning down any elites
After they will lose enough of their tools they will lose or at least those who have courage will die trying. Better than harming each other and letting them prosper because "nothing can be done,we will canibalize ourselves and kill ourselves, society will fall blah blah blah".
Fuck no. If I would be going to die I would like rather die standing ! Fuck them all !
I think it's dependent
abso-fucking-lutely but thing is it would be at least really rare to see autistic person liking it really.
but she has odd facial tics and stuff
But there are many "disorders" allowing this as well. Mk Ultra is of course linked more to American intelligence oficially but well - maybe too... Cabal looks in fact being global.
Well that could be the reason of diagnosing her with autism officially. Most of psychologists wouldn't be able to differentiate autism and schizophrenia despite this is quite easy LOL - they are so "educated"...
Well to do this they would need to keep those state of misery somehow - by use of police or something other that could be targeted,blamed for all and physically eliminated. Otherwise people will recreate order and will start looking for their bunkers to kill them all.
It is natural that even under socialism in Cuba and Venezuela people organize themselves. The only thing that keeps their society in misery is apparatus of repression.
When people will stay disoriented they will follow any people giving solutions. And final solution of the question of tyrants and their families would be most natural to postulate - you don't need "big brain" to make such idea popular.
So sorry, at longer scale those idiotic fear-mongering scenario is impossible. We will just start killing cops and their military if they will do this. Maybe at the beginning with sticks,but question of time will be making more powerful weapons.
We would form new governments.And we would ultimately hunt them down,no rat hiding in bunker will stay alive within such scenario.
But unfortunately you are just stupid doomer. They are too smart to do this such way which would lead so easily to their demise - unfortunately...
she cannot logic because she is basically a high functioning autist man
Normie if I would be able to hit you I would hit you. She is not autistic probably. They just used "autism" as a label for her.Nothing more.
First of all autistic person wouldn't be happy with media and new people around,for such person it would be really creepy at best.I am probably "high functioning" and believe me - meeting new people despite year of "training" is still unpleasant.
Second of all - no,high functioning autistic people ARE logical. Your comment about autistic people not being logical is really not only insult - it is idiotic,as autistic person could be more logical (to the level not being "normal") than you normies.
Of course due to obsessions it is possible to create eco-obsessed autist.Correct. But look at this: https://www.nairaland.com/attachments/10285500_a1_jpegbab936fe3b02402318a967515cfcc7dd
or her "team" travelling by plane while she was travelling Atlantic (I don't care so I wouldn't look for it)
Obsessed person who would really believe thing would probably never do hypocrisy. Would be authentic. Greta is hypocrite. What makes me really doubting she would be really autistic.
LOL... Saw this video long time ago.