sssh such claim would make you "terrorist" u/axolotl_peyotl
Moreover it wouldn't work. Only frontmen. Tactical nuke during next Bilderberg meeting would slow them better ;)
8 years ago promotional video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z78mgfKprdg
also technology 8 years ago (luckily miniaturization a bit stopped):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o7mRg74qcY
look also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQIMGV5vtd4
Currently:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLmmPnMvwNY
Commercially availabe drones with camera - of course made in China unfortunately are sometimes even about 40$. So still it isn't cheap,but it is cheaper and cheaper.
And actually by using swarm you don't need to make every "bullet drone" having camera so it can be accessible too soon.
OMH u/free-will-of-choice answering with understandable text.
Darwinism of course was never proved: The fittest survive. What is meant by the fittest? Not the strongest; not the cleverest—Weakness and stupidity everywhere survive. There is no way of determining fitness except in that a thing does survive. “Fitness,” then, is only another name for “survival.” Darwinisn: That survivors survive.
What a nonsence. All fitting to environment survive. Or rather more clearly:
those who not fit to their environment too much do not survive enough to have offspring.
Truism so.But big one. This is really Darwin's theory.
"Survival of the fittest" is vulgar and wrong interpretation by half-brain calvinists for whom that was scientific confirmation of their "supremacy".
It is the same like human ancestor being monkey.
It is not.Common ancestor who could be called monkey (and who said evolution wasn't tool of God who is REASON to create another sentient reason at his image). What is also forgotten but was from ancient times known to ancient "primitive" nations - we share much with all other life,all animals and even maybe plants.
u/RandomAnon78 : BMJ is british medical journal. Are we sure it is truth ? it is published by the trade union the British Medical Association
They still want enough slaves to live comfortably on their yachts.
They need people who are smart enough to push buttons at the factory, but not smart enough to overthrow them.
They still want World Class restaurants where they can go eat, they just don't want there to be any waiting when they arrive.
Looks logically however their behaviour is not logical a bit. All they needed to do is accelerating a bit existing tendencies in first world and cull third world (Africa,China,India,South America). Instead they chose so radical solution targeting first world. This people are not logical,they are crazy fanatics wanting to treat people like u/Taliban says:
everyone else will be lambs to the slaughter.
To keep all technological level we have you need smartest ones,otherwise all will start collapsing and after re-normalisation you could end at best 100 years backward living in some kind of Mad Max like society. Of course people could survive and adapt to such conditions but level of life will drop dramatically. They are clearly crazy and dumb so.
Your ability to hoard food, create food and get away with it, as well as your ability to conceal yourself from the Big Tech death lists matters more. permalink parent save report block reply
Without having gun it all will be taken by those who have guns.
your ability to conceal yourself from the Big Tech
In long term it will be impossible. The only chance is resistance.
In other words we're dependant on a more fragile system (think single point of failure). We have allowed the "System" to control the essentials necessary to survive.
Don't be a pussy.
Indeed those game animation it is "predictive programming" - to scare you. In case you live in big city yes,you could be in shit if you wouldn't be prepared. But the fact is even in cities people were surviving wars.
Of course those who will not adapt and overcome will not survive.
You can't do this, you fall. No amount of brute firepower saves you.
Maybe yes,but if it will have a chance to save the others I accept that.
People now do NOT have such degrees of power.
Without people they are nobodies and nothing. If you are rather ready to die than to serve them they already lost this way or another.
"suggested by others" cannot really be in this model. It is "perceived as suggested by others".
Some claim pink is not existing objectively. Really ? Which color exist objectively ? Japanese were not recognising difference between green and blue [please not comment this example ok ?]