6
cant_even 6 points ago +6 / -0

Let them show us how safe it is by taking big swigs on camera.

by DrLeaks
2
cant_even 2 points ago +2 / -0

... as the "noticing" accelerates.

by pkvi
1
cant_even 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let me know when an "algorithm" can fill a pot-hole or build a bridge. And how is Dubai, who imports pretty much everything, going to pay for food; let alone all that bling?

"Disruption by inventing favorable stats" is in no way 'futuristic'; it's only applying beep-boop blinkenlights to scams used by failing organizations forever.

1
cant_even 1 point ago +2 / -1

Meanwhile in the "Arsenal of Democracy®", our budget-busting 'defense industrial plant' couldn't produce one month's worth of 1944's output of planes, tanks, ships and ammunition; not even if they were given the entire Federal Budget.

by DrLeaks
1
cant_even 1 point ago +1 / -0

Typical shyster tactics. Like those criminals who say the security-cams "violated their privacy".

1
cant_even 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder if there'll be anyone who even cares enough to collect and display scenes of the "Western" collapse.

2
cant_even 2 points ago +2 / -0

...and of course it's (1) "curvy / plus-sized" and (2) Tattooed. Exactly the kind of personality who demonstrates the ability to make rational decisions.

2
cant_even 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was a short period right after the introduction of "Operation Warp Speed" when the media-ocracy was 'expressing great concern' over the lack of testing.

2
cant_even 2 points ago +2 / -0

X-axis is just as bad; 1964-1981 occupies the same space as 2019-2022.

2
cant_even 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is anyone old enough to remember "Baghdad Bob"?

Looks like he must have been 'turned' to the dark-side after his 'capture'.

by DrLeaks
4
cant_even 4 points ago +4 / -0

Anyone who buys one of those deserves whatever happens to them. "Vote" with your wallets, people.

1
cant_even 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you believe that, without conscription, the demographics of the US military will continue to be sufficiently "working-class and Southern" for long?

never break apart...go to both sides

Now there's a rub, because I firmly believe that this country is already set against itself to the point where support for only two identifiable 'sides' (as in Civil War I) is impossible.

Try it yourself: Assemble the following factions, belief-systems and "movements" into anything resembling the 1860s alignment: two compact, unified belligerent forces, that held an identifiable land-mass with interior supply-lines:

  1. ADL/SPLC
  2. Nation of Islam
  3. LaRaza
  4. BLM
  5. 'Antifa'
  6. "Open-Borders"
  7. Right-to-Life / Right-to-Choose, single-issue zealots
  8. Gun-Control / Gun Rights, single-issue zealots
  9. The amorphous blob of 'militias' and "hwite supremists"
  10. Socialists / Communists / Anarchists / Libertarians / 'Progressives'

I think it's far more likely the US.gov will collapse to the point where it can no longer control the territory. You'll know that's occurred when those troops' paychecks start bouncing or are converted to some digital Zimbabwe-scrip. THEN you'll see whole units deserting and setting up fiefdoms, and a short period of "Mad Max" anarchy.

But once the formerly-united-States falls below the critical mass necessary to repel invaders, a long line of older, harder cultures with centuries-old grudges will move in to pick up the pieces.

3
cant_even 3 points ago +3 / -0

Outside right-wing fantasy fiction, nobody believes "DA TROOPZ" are going to join in some populist uprising, whether or not some of them refused the clot-shot.

Go ahead, someone: Post an instance of a single US military unit refusing an order to engage US citizens, ever.

On the other hand there are abundant examples of the opposite. Here are a couple:

George S. Patton, Dwight Eisenhower and Douglas MacArthur "cleaned up" the Bonus Army. No record of desertions in those units. This probably had a great influence on the sheep-like behavior of the "greatest generation" when they were told to turn their gold over to the government.

Also, under Billy Mitchell the US Army Air Corps flew top-cover and surveillance for a corrupt sheriff who engaged in aerial chemical warfare on civilians with his "private air force". President Warren Harding then sent troops to disarm the "treasonous" coal miners.

by DrLeaks
1
cant_even 1 point ago +1 / -0

...and it looks like another trip to the parts store and/or wrecking yard to stockpile spares to keep my 23-year-old SUV on the road.

2
cant_even 2 points ago +2 / -0

Until and unless I can be shown a connection to this telepathy/astral stuff, I'm going to maintain my current views of the "deep-state's" relationship with social media, which is a more likely reason they 'aren't shutting it down'.

Consider the valuable "services" Current-year social media provides, that are illegal/unconstitutional for government to perform:

  1. Act as data-vacuum and honey-pot to attract 'troublemakers' and compile data on them.
  2. Perform Ministry-of-Truth thought-shaping, gatekeeping/filtering and propaganda-dissemination while posing as a "private companies"
  3. Now with more Memory-Holes® to 'keep us safe from misinformation'.

If government could legally do any of that directly, it would cost ten times as much and work one tenth as well. Which is why the recent Congressional and Executive-branch posturing (regulate! | break 'em up!) lately is just diversionary.

4
cant_even 4 points ago +4 / -0

Being eagerly adopted in an "Exceptional Nation" near you.

6
cant_even 6 points ago +6 / -0

This-cubed.

The only way to use "dirt" to damage an enemy is REVEAL IT ALL, INSTANTLY, before the 'bad guy' has a chance to prepare defenses.

5
cant_even 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh boy! Another "about to...." [do something BIG] Real Soon Now!

So what's it going to be, a "random robbery gone wrong"? A drug-overdose 'suicide'? How about a malfunction of a "connected" vehicle?

Whatever it is, it'll be the last we ever hear of Ms. Ransome.

All these publicity-hounds (assuming they actually had any usable dirt) make the same basic error of telegraphing their moves, which:

  1. makes them look like dupes or shills
  2. gives the 'target' time to implement countermeasures
by DrLeaks
9
cant_even 9 points ago +9 / -0

I lived before "social media". I can live without it again. In fact, I've dumped all the sites who ask for as much as an email-address.

2
cant_even 2 points ago +3 / -1

OP's former "Empire" is being colonized by its former colonies.

2
cant_even 2 points ago +2 / -0

The future is assured. It's all in two books: Camp of the Saints vs. Lifeboat Ethics.

The betting on when (not 'if') each "western target nation" starts adopting the Israeli 'walls & guns' model ought to be a hot topic for the internet-gambling crowd.

2
cant_even 2 points ago +2 / -0

Meanwhile, my damn CREDIT UNION is offering "100% mortgage financing" ($0 down) for the first time in its history. That was what it decided to trumpet on the front page of its quarterly newsletter.

That's really confidence-inspiring...

1
cant_even 1 point ago +1 / -0

Personal storage has never been cheaper by any logical measure. Back up your computers and phones to your storage device, and if you're worried about "your house burning down" keep an offsite backup with parents/friends.

You don't "need" iCloud, One-Drive or Google Drive and they all send your stuff straight to Uncle Sam.

IMHO, this current kerfuffle is a honey-pot troll to make stupid criminals 'think' they can do shady shit on Apple Devices.

by DrLeaks
5
cant_even 5 points ago +5 / -0

There goes "mom's" social-credit score: She's probably also been 'Red-Flagged' and put on the "No-Fly" list.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›