7
axolotl_peyotl 7 points ago +7 / -0

The number of COVID cases has been faked in various ways.

By far, the most extensive strategy is re-labeling. Flu is called COVID.

We don’t need charts and graphs to see this. It’s right in front of our eyes.

The definition of a COVID case allows flu in the door. There is nothing unique about that definition. For example, a cough, or chills and fever, would constitute “a mild case of COVID.” [1] [2]

A positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 would also be required, but as I’ve shown in my recent series on the test, obtaining a false positive is as easy as pie. [3]

All you have to do is run the test at more than 35 cycles. Most labs run the test at 40 cycles. A cycle is a quantum leap in magnification of the swab sample taken from the patient. When you run the test at more than 35 cycles, false-positives come pouring out like water from a fire hose. [4] [5] [5a] [5b]

So…with ordinary flu symptoms plus a false-positive PCR test…voila, you have a COVID case.

Keep in mind that, overwhelmingly, most COVID cases are mild. In other words, they’re indistinguishable from ordinary flu.

But there is a rabbit hole here, and we can go down that hole much farther. The next question is: what is a flu case? What is it really?

Researcher Peter Doshi did much to answer that question. In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published his shocking report, which created tremors through the halls of the CDC, where “the experts” used to tell the press that 36,000 people in the US die every year from the flu.

Here is a quote from Doshi’s report, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412): [6] [7]

“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”

Boom.

You see, the CDC creates one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.

This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.

But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.

Therefore, the CDC could only say, with assurance, that 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.

Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).” These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.

This death toll is obviously far lower than the old parroted 36,000 figure.

However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of annual flu deaths plummet even further.

In other words, it’s all promotion and hype.

But we’re not finished yet. Because…what test were researchers using to decide there were 18 cases of honest flu, in which a virus was found and identified? Answer: unknown.

It’s quite probable the test didn’t really isolate a flu virus at all. It only identified some marker that was ASSUMED, without proof, to be unique to a flu virus.

If so—ZERO cases of actual flu were found in the population.

Instead, what we had was “flu-like illness.” Chills, cough, congestion, fever, fatigue; the ubiquitous symptoms that describe about a billion cases of illness, every year, worldwide.

The cause of those billion cases? There is no single cause. Instead, there are many factors, ranging from sudden weather changes to air pollution, to malnutrition, to sub-standard sanitation…on and on.

That being the case, we can now say: Many, many cases of FAKE FLU are being relabeled FAKE COVID.

Now we’re getting real.

The medical cartel “discovers” (markets) huge numbers of so-called unique diseases—each disease with a purported specific cause: virus A, virus B, virus C…

For each virus, there must be at least several highly profitable drugs that supposedly kill the germ. And for each germ, there must be a vaccine that prevents the disease.

Billions and trillions in rewards follow.

And so does CONTROL. Control of minds.

Because the population is tuned up by ceaseless propaganda to believe in the rigid one-disease one-germ notion.

And when the time is right, the medical cartel can even claim a new germ is decimating the world, and they must “destroy the village in order to save it.”

Which is the psychotic fiction we are in the middle of, right now.

The Holy Church of Biological Mysticism needs your support. Give them your time, your money, your livelihood, your future, your loyalty, your faith.

If you do, you are their most important product.

6
axolotl_peyotl 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is the HEART of the scamdemic.

The hundreds of thousands of "flu" deaths have NEVER been about influenza.

IOW, they have had this scandemic waiting for whenever they needed it. All they had to do was reclassify the already hundreds of thousands of death per year that are due to medical malpractice and poisoning from Big Pharma.

by pkvi
7
axolotl_peyotl 7 points ago +7 / -0

Terrain Theory.

2
axolotl_peyotl 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Dollar Vigilante guy talks about Monero a lot...he's got some spicy and entertaining takes.

6
axolotl_peyotl 6 points ago +6 / -0

The "problem" users have been fairly quiet if you hadn't noticed...most are on a temp ban.

I don't have the ability or power to implement a ban feature, but I will reach out to the admins.

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only thing to theorize about is whether they're just evil humans or actual aliens.

lol so true!

2
axolotl_peyotl 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't justify permanently banning folks unless they make calls to violence, etc.

However, I will happily repeatedly temp ban folks like that until they give up and bother someone else (that particularly user is on a temp ban rn, which is why it's been so peaceful).

6
axolotl_peyotl [M] 6 points ago +6 / -0

A week or so ago I raised the minimum karma to vote to 200 points, hoping it would reduce some of the drive-by downvoting (it did)...but it also has reduced voting overall, which wasn't the intent.

I just changed the requirement to vote from 200 to 20 so hopefully that only stops the very new spam accounts and doesn't prevent the rest of folks from voting.

5
axolotl_peyotl 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well I don't have "admin" access just mod access but I can look into it...at the very least I made mod logs public so folks like you can keep an eye out for stuff like this.

4
axolotl_peyotl 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bombing Syria was one of the most brilliant moves if you want to completely tank and sabotage the so-called Biden "administration."

It's fascinating to watch the psychotic Biden sycophants reeling by scrambling to justify actual murder or by simply ignoring it completely.

Completely, and utterly, fascinating.

5
axolotl_peyotl 5 points ago +5 / -0

The problem is this lowlife probably has 50 accounts ready to replace these ones.

Notice how the only talking point the shills have against me reflects this.

They couldn't get me for breaking reddit's TOS (admins don't even have a proper example), so TMOR took a different approach:

  1. Flood my every thread on /r/conspiracy with alts to harass me and break the sub's rules.

  2. Compel me to ban these dozens of alts because that's literally my job (after my ban many TMOR users bragged about getting 30+ alts banned by me).

  3. Create a narrative that I'm a power hungry mod who has banned "hundreds" of users...when in fact I was literally banning the same handful of accounts and their alts again and again.

  4. Coordinate with admins (who themselves coordinated with a fucking sitting US Senator...yes that happened) to get me removed from /r/conspiracy and banned from reddit.

  5. Distract from the blatant insanity of this decision by "correcting the record" that it's "OK" I was banned because I was a big mean mod, despite the fact that I was unceremoniously removed mere hours after a Senator complained about "reddit conspiracies".

  6. /r/conspiracy is completely cucked.

3
axolotl_peyotl 3 points ago +3 / -0

"trust the plan" kind of garbage

While I admit I shared a lot of the Sidney Powell/Lin Wood hopium, I never told anyone to "trust the plan" and I also never jumped on the Q train.

My history at /r/conspiracy can vouch for that. I never pushed Q...tbh I never felt passionately one way or the other...to me it was like hey look more folk are joining our cause to fight global child trafficking, the more the merrier!

Is this about realistic conspiracies or is it the Onion?

Why not both? Sometimes the juicy conspiracies are better hidden when surrounded with humor and fluff. It's about finding the proper ratio...a forum with 100% damning revelations would be shut down quickly, and one that gets overrun with Babylon Bee mentality will have the opposite, but equally deleterious, effect.

3
axolotl_peyotl 3 points ago +3 / -0

The shills do in fact use "codes" and patterns in their user names, and good mods train themselves to notice them. Good catch on that one ;)

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for this take, genuinely. It gives me hope that folks know actually what went down.

I can find posts from him from 7 years ago critizcing both republicans and democrats..

I also routinely criticized trump throughout his entire presidency. The shills ignored those threads because they didn't fit the narrative.

7
axolotl_peyotl 7 points ago +7 / -0

temp banned along with magapede and a few other regular shills and NPCs...that's why it's been nice and peaceful as of late.

7
axolotl_peyotl 7 points ago +7 / -0

After some posts I've seen from the main mod

Which ones in particular? If you can't remember specifically, which sentiments? Not a trap, just wondering.

carrying forward with the spirit of /r/conspiracy

We're trying.../r/conspiracy sure as hell isn't anymore.

I'm leaning more toward this is a side chamber to further divide critical thinkers

What's the alternative? Reddit's dead...do we just give up and get off the internet?

We have to share info and brainstorm somewhere online.

If anything, this place is populated by those who can't stomach reddit anymore. I could create a new account there any time, but I find the concept morally repugnant at this point.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›