A dozen or so attacking a recent post of mine and they're not even subtle, reported a few but I don't think anything will be done.
We as a community need to do something about them, lest the important conspiracies lie buried from their brigading and REEEEEE comments killing the discussion.
Did the mods lose their ban hammer or something?
While I admit I shared a lot of the Sidney Powell/Lin Wood hopium, I never told anyone to "trust the plan" and I also never jumped on the Q train.
My history at /r/conspiracy can vouch for that. I never pushed Q...tbh I never felt passionately one way or the other...to me it was like hey look more folk are joining our cause to fight global child trafficking, the more the merrier!
Why not both? Sometimes the juicy conspiracies are better hidden when surrounded with humor and fluff. It's about finding the proper ratio...a forum with 100% damning revelations would be shut down quickly, and one that gets overrun with Babylon Bee mentality will have the opposite, but equally deleterious, effect.
It only makes sense if this is compromised like Reddit.
Boggles the mind.
I think since this is a conspiracy forum and we're banned off the rest of the internet the least we can do is ban all accounts who aren't honest or open to it - they can lurk or ask questions but when their comments are 100% derogatory we need shadow bans, regular bans and even IP bans.
It's noticeable, the effect they're having.
We're going to need to setup another site or be limited to Q - unless the mods get their act together.
I can't justify permanently banning folks unless they make calls to violence, etc.
However, I will happily repeatedly temp ban folks like that until they give up and bother someone else (that particularly user is on a temp ban rn, which is why it's been so peaceful).
See, I look at most of Magapede's comments, then I look at the post he comments on, and more often than not he's right. There is SO MUCH disinfo here (mostly from right wing sites) that it's not even funny.
Take for instance this. Guy says Kamala believed Joe is a rapist.
I point out, for accuracy, that she said she believed the women that said he made them feel uncomfortable at times. She said this before Tara Reade came out. She never addressed. This is known as disinfo and spin.
And when I pointed this out, I get called a faggot and a shill.
So people here just want to live in their little fantasy land, never be questioned, yelling echoes back and forth and throwing around the words kike nigger and faggot all day, telling people to go back to reddit while choking on Trump's taint juice.
That is the culture here that's been bred. Disinfo, racism, bigotry and LEFT BAD.
Kamala had an attack ad Vs Biden. Highlighted creepy Joe. Women were/had accused him of being creepy and sex crimes.
How the bleep does she go from that (obviously knowing he's a creepy rapist - probably knowing he's a pedophile, too) to now?
Because it suited her politically then to believe those women, but now it suits her to minimize that (brush under the rug), and pretend creepy Joe ain't creepy.
You defend the elites you're either a retard or a shill... Well technically all shills (who don't know the truth+paid to lie anyway) are retards, too.
We don't want you here. You ban us from 99% of the internet then insist we can't ban you from the 1% we specifically made for ourselves.
Snakes.
I'm not defeding her, I'm defending TRUTH.
Can you show me where she addresses the Tara Reade rape accusations?
Can you show me where I am lying?
FFS people, quit lying to make your partisan agenda. At least be FUCKING ACCURATE.