1
alasbabylon103 1 point ago +1 / -0

Buy distilled water until you can get your own reverse osmosis machine. Or a berkey. All bottled water except distilled may or may not have fluoride and they are not required to list it. The machines in supermarkets are very unreliable. Filters wear out especially if your tap water is highly contaminated. You can try zero water too. But it gets pricey.

2
alasbabylon103 2 points ago +3 / -1

Trump incited a mob. Worse his fbi posted blackmail material on pelosi. Blackmail is no way to run a government . It’s inexcusable.

1
alasbabylon103 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well he called the protesters a MOB. Loyalty is not his strong suit. Clearly every man for himself is the example he is setting. Oh well good as jocko says. GOOD.

5
alasbabylon103 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes. It’s bizarre in this day and age. It’s like a bad dream. Feels like overnight the cultural norms have shifted.

1
alasbabylon103 1 point ago +2 / -1

I think that the goal is to intimidate opposition into silence. This is really concerning. @axo reminds me of how the communists took control in Cuba. The communist party moved very aggressively and quickly to stifle anyone questioning.......many Cubans fled with nothing but the clothes on their backs. They had to abandon everything their possessed, everything.

5
alasbabylon103 5 points ago +5 / -0

better not be about vaccines and operation warp speed!

by TlKr
2
alasbabylon103 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed, although I have noticed patterns across sites. Certain topics have better quality “shills assigned”. So I think it’s not site specific as I once thought. It’s beyond my understanding though. I could just be over thinking it.

4
alasbabylon103 4 points ago +5 / -1

If the courts won’t hear the evidence then what is the point? So is Giuliani naive ? What is he trying to gain at this point? The whole thing is a shit show and the one thing I know is that what I say does not matter. And the people in charge are like an Alice in wonderland scene. No thank you.

by TlKr
2
alasbabylon103 2 points ago +3 / -1

I have come to the conclusion that teams of shills/bots are somehow assigned to your ip. They follow you to different sites. I am not sure about the mechanism but it’s what I have observed the past 3 years. When axo got banned they probably upped the amount of shills Assigned to his profile. I am not a tech savvy so what I am saying might be totally wrong, however I have observed this over the years.

1
alasbabylon103 1 point ago +2 / -1

“ I know the key to his treasure trove of TRUTH.“ I missed that part when I first read the tweet. Does Lin wood have the Key to Isac kappy insurance file?? I don’t even want to hope at this point. Lin wood has my attention!

3
alasbabylon103 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dr. Tent probably writes a medical exemption for them? Or maybe be he forges a vaccine record? That’s just a guess. It’s a good question. My doctor just sent an email stating that she would not be writing a single medical exemption (For the covid vaccine) for anyone no exceptions. That’s malpractice in my opinion because there are Recognized medical exemptions. But I guess it must be her choice?

3
alasbabylon103 3 points ago +3 / -0

Your team used the same tactic with the Nigerian “frontline doctor” that was educating the public on hydroxychlotpquine protocol. Now you have resorted to attack the messenger tactic. Whew do they just program you like bots ? You guys seem so automatic and defy yhe very values you pretend to support. Lin wood is free to worship how he chooses. FREE. Maybe you should be more interested in getting answers from professional criminals that are misleading and enriching themselves. But that’s who uou work for isn’t it?

1
alasbabylon103 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is interesting. A doctor I was talking to told me his problem with vaccines in general were the preservatives in it. Like formaldehyde or aluminum. These preservative are meant to stabilize the vaccine. I wonder if the moderna vaccine does not contain the typical heavy metals that “stable” vaccines do not have.

1
alasbabylon103 1 point ago +1 / -0

Her attorney will determine what Catwgory of whistleblower and what statute to file under.Federal laws cover both federal employees and private employees. You are the one trying to dismiss her report of fraud by claiming she is not a federal employee. She is still a whistleblower who reported fraud and that is covered by federal laws and protections.

2
alasbabylon103 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am always baffled at how the news is able to promote medical treatments to the public. I have seen them have a block party with vaccine trucks (like food trucks). If this was a pharma company heads would roll. Isn’t there laws about recommending medical treatments without a license? So weird. So unethical. So dangerous.

2
alasbabylon103 2 points ago +2 / -0

Breitbarted more likely. I cannot remember a time there was so much “spy agencies“ type of activity right put in the open. Las Vegas, Epstein, qanon, Nashville, the election. It’s horrible. It’s so bad for the economy. These cloak and dagger types need to be rounded up and brought to public trial. An example needs to be made. I wonder if this is how it is in China and it’s just their tactics on us soil?

1
alasbabylon103 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hate ignorance: “Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Lawson v. FMR LLC that Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) Section 806, which protects employees from retaliation, also applies to private companies, contractors and subcontractors that provide services to public companies. “Retaliation” is broadly defined to include the discharge, demotion, suspension, threatening, harassment or any discrimination against a whistleblower. The Lawson decision has made SOX Section 806 an important consideration for private companies.” There are many types of whistleblowers In the private sector: pharma wistleblowers are only one example. Qui tam or false claims. There are also whistleblowers in the finance sector (securities exchange commission) You are spreading misinformation about A whistleblower Who is reporting fraud. Be careful it could be found to be a form of retaliation and I bet that employee already has found an attorney. I am sure you would not want to found liable for retaliation? Federal employees get additional protections than private sector whistleblowers but even then the fact that it is involving a federal election that would up to the judges interpretation and a skilled attorney. Whistleblowers are near and dear my heart and your too partisan and ignorant for my taste. I suggest you share the link with whoever you work for, they need better compliance practices right now they are acting like professional mobsters. https://weaver.com/blog/whistleblower-protections-hit-private-companies-are-you-ready

1
alasbabylon103 1 point ago +1 / -0

That does not exonerate dominions responsibly to investigate and report the fraud to authorities. See she reported fraud and now the ball is in their court. They chose to attack and retaliate against her. That’s how guilty people act as opposed to a company which prioritizes ethics. She reported and dominion retaliated. It follows the MO of that type of criminal. She can still apply as a federal whistleblower but she needs a lawyer. Hopefully someone is reaching out to her as we speak.

4
alasbabylon103 4 points ago +4 / -0

Whistleblower protection act does not only apply to federal government workers. It applies to all workers reporters fraud. However federal workers get additional protections that whistleblowers do not have.

1
alasbabylon103 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s the problem, without an attorney she will not be recognized as a whistleblower and you can Definitely be a whistlebler under fed protectionS with a private company. What do you think pharma whistleblowers are? Same thing. However this is regarding a federal election and state contractors and taxpayer funds so whistleblower protections apply Even more so ! just like it does with any pharma company.

1
alasbabylon103 1 point ago +1 / -0

He helped me so much on the road to healing. Unlike other docs who just got paid bank pushing their meds for more kickbakcs. Dr fung is a healer!

3
alasbabylon103 3 points ago +3 / -0

No you are not understanding that an employer who retaliated against an employee who reports fraud by “defaming” Violates the whistleblower protection act. It’s not a defamation case. It’s just further proof that the employer violates basic employment obligations systematically. Like I said employers have an obligation to report and cooperate with investigators when fraud is reported by the whistleblower. Instead dominion chose to threaten the whistleblower and characterize her as menial to dismiss her report. This violates the act. It’s retaliation and I intimidation. It has nothing to do with defamation or the election. Whistleblowers have federal protections especially when it involves federal and state agencies.

3
alasbabylon103 3 points ago +3 / -0

Federal whistleblower cases take years. This has nothing to do with trump or the election. It’s a specific act called the whistleblower protection act. It is related to Employment cases too. If she has an attorney hopefully they help her. However the current climate is very politically charged and The Michigan attorney general is trying to get sanction against attorneys fightIng fraud connected to election. So it might be hard for her to get a lawyer.I would advice her to contact EEOC and file a complaint at least it would open an official investigation to make sure her employment rights were not violated. Poor thing, I would not want to be in her shoes. she is a hero for exposing these criminal acts. it’s sad that the executives have chosen Intimidation And retaliation rather than taking steps to fix the problems she exposed. Of course dominion executive don’t follow their obligations either whether it’s employment law, whistleblower laws, or election laws. However you don’t know that is also typical of companies committing fraud. Very sad but it happens everyday. It actually fits the legal definition of “conspiracy” to a tee! Your characterization of her being drunk while she is publicly interrogated is cruel and horrible. Testifying in court takes a lot of courage. That she seemed like an amateur and not smooth or polished like cnn anchors tells me she was sincere and unrehearsed. You are part of the problem that whistleblowers face. Your type enable politicians and criminals get away with fraud.

view more: Next ›