Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

70
What is going on here? Dominion Voting Systems Sends Nasty Letter to Witness Mellissa Carone. Is this witness intimidation? (www.thegatewaypundit.com)
posted 4 years ago by Transfer 4 years ago by Transfer +70 / -0
61 comments share
61 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (61)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– alasbabylon103 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

No you are not understanding that an employer who retaliated against an employee who reports fraud by “defaming” Violates the whistleblower protection act. It’s not a defamation case. It’s just further proof that the employer violates basic employment obligations systematically. Like I said employers have an obligation to report and cooperate with investigators when fraud is reported by the whistleblower. Instead dominion chose to threaten the whistleblower and characterize her as menial to dismiss her report. This violates the act. It’s retaliation and I intimidation. It has nothing to do with defamation or the election. Whistleblowers have federal protections especially when it involves federal and state agencies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– newuserfromreddit -2 points 4 years ago +3 / -5

First, Dominion is not a federal or state agency. As a private corporation, the applicability of U.S. whistleblowing is pretty tightly constrained; there usually has to be some sort of a public report duty for the employee to benefit, or something in the company bylaws. I'm not aware of any protections that would apply to Carone under these circumstances. To be clear, whistleblower protection is not a blanket thing.

Second, the Whistleblower Protection Act only applies to governmental workers, which Carone is not.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– alasbabylon103 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Whistleblower protection act does not only apply to federal government workers. It applies to all workers reporters fraud. However federal workers get additional protections that whistleblowers do not have.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– newuserfromreddit -3 points 4 years ago +1 / -4

I don't know how else to tell you that it does. See, 5 U.S.C. § 2105 (limiting the definition of an "employee" under the Whistleblower Protection Act to federal positions).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– alasbabylon103 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I hate ignorance: “Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Lawson v. FMR LLC that Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) Section 806, which protects employees from retaliation, also applies to private companies, contractors and subcontractors that provide services to public companies. “Retaliation” is broadly defined to include the discharge, demotion, suspension, threatening, harassment or any discrimination against a whistleblower. The Lawson decision has made SOX Section 806 an important consideration for private companies.” There are many types of whistleblowers In the private sector: pharma wistleblowers are only one example. Qui tam or false claims. There are also whistleblowers in the finance sector (securities exchange commission) You are spreading misinformation about A whistleblower Who is reporting fraud. Be careful it could be found to be a form of retaliation and I bet that employee already has found an attorney. I am sure you would not want to found liable for retaliation? Federal employees get additional protections than private sector whistleblowers but even then the fact that it is involving a federal election that would up to the judges interpretation and a skilled attorney. Whistleblowers are near and dear my heart and your too partisan and ignorant for my taste. I suggest you share the link with whoever you work for, they need better compliance practices right now they are acting like professional mobsters. https://weaver.com/blog/whistleblower-protections-hit-private-companies-are-you-ready

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy