Dude I didn't give the time of day to flat earth until like 2 years ago. I didn't even make fun of it because it seemed so ridiculous it wasn't worth the effort. Even when I did start looking I thought it was just a government psy-op. Don't trust anyone, research it for yourself. But realize that if it's true, you have to suspend a lifetime of programming while you research. Think of all the schooling, movies, TV, books that program you with space and sphere earth. But is any of it actually real? If you want to give it a shot I recommend OddTV, Eric Dubay, and the Flat Earth clock app by blue water bay (it has video archives that will answer all your questions). You may have to look on platforms like bitchute due to heavy censorship. You don't have to prove flat earth, just start with seeing why the globe isn't true.
If we live on a sphere with a circumference of 24,901 miles then the geometry is inarguable and this curve should be observable on land and water over a given distance. Land is more difficult cause of varied terrain, but water does not bend around the earth. The earth is flat and water is always level.
The sextant wasn't invented until like 2000 years after Aristotle. I think what you are referring to is the Eratosthenes experiment with pillars and shadows in two different cities that 'proved' a sphere. Unfortunately you can produce the same results on a plane with a local light. I can show you with two beer bottles and a light bulb, so this effect fits the flat earth model.
It was literally geometry that first clued me in to flat earth. As a Mariner I would sometimes do earth curve calculations to see when an object like a lighthouse or drilling rig should come into view. And I kept seeing them so far off, with such clarity that refraction couldn't explain it. It was as if there was no curve that you would expect on a planet of 24,901 miles in circumference. Then finding out nasa fakes everything finally got me to investigate flat earth.
Yup, they have had that problem since eve heeded the snake.
Thanks I already stress enough about this lol. From my own personal life experience, it seems like more women then men around my age got the clot shot. Though I live in a brainwashed blue part of the country, I dont know how the females did in red areas. Just speaking statistically, it seems like woman had a harder time overcoming the peer pressure and emotion appeal propaganda surrounding the clot shots. Though thankfully I've seen some girls on dating apps that refuse to date anyone vaccinated.
Found someone who made a response video to those 10 points if you want to hear a retort on any of them.
We didn't go to the moon, its extremely obvious when ya look into it. Once you figure that out your mind will be more receptive to the truth about earth. Or you will stay a slave of the NWO.
So that the elites can open a portal to release demons. May be involved in Mandela effect phenomenon as well so they can distort our reality for their benefit.
I would dismantle it if I had my way and have tribunals for everyone involved. But all this does make sense why France/Switzerland is allowed by the Cabal to have so much nuclear energy.
Dude the moon landing are so fake and gay its shameful. Simplest proof; the lunar lander looks like a homeless tent/crappy piece of modern art.
I think cern is the reason France invested in nuclear power plants while Germany and other countries went for 'sustainable'.
Cern required dependable and abundant energy.
Van allen belt is just an excuse for why we can't fake the moonlandings convincingly again. The earth is flat and stationary and has a firmament above that we cannot pass through.
Is it cause the daughters of all vaccinated mom will be sterile, in addition to other population control?
Man watch some celestial navigation videos, you have it completely inverted. How do I know? Cause I've been a licensed mariner my entire adult life. When you use a sextant you view a local apparent horizon, and the zenith is straight overhead. You have to correct your observation to get a celestial horizon. This forms a 90° angle (flat earth horizon) which you use to calculate the local apparent altitude of a star.
Whether you are on a globe or a plane you would still have to make corrections to form a 90° angle with the celestial horizon and zenith. If you are on a flat earth it's because of your height of eye over the ocean and potential atmospheric distortion. If you are on a globe it's also because of earth curve. BUT EARTH CURVE IS NEVER INCLUDED IN CELESTIAL NAVIGATION CALCULATIONS. Your corrections assume a plane dipshit.
Laugh all ya want but the fact is sextants are used by people who hold both beliefs globe and flat for hundreds of years. You were too retarded to make that simple connection.
Hahaha lmao. Hey which break room at the pentagon you want to have lunch at tomorrow?
Lol I don't see how this settles anything. For centuries people successfully used sextants whether you thought it was flat or spherical. Columbus even used them when he was wrong about how big the earth is. Whether we use a Mercator projection map or a azimuthal equidistant projection, they both have lines of latitude and longitude over them that we can plot ourselves on.
Shit during world War 2 the primary map that was used by military vessels and planes was the 'ww2 air map of the world', Google it and tell me what that looks like.
Sextants make more sense on flat earth: https://www.bitchute.com/video/x3qknB0XWOnA/
That flight is possible on the flat earth model as the north pole is the center of the known world. A similar flight over the south pole to get across the world is impossible though. Look up flights from Perth to somewhere in South America like Buenos Aires (the shortest distance between those 2 cities is directly over the middle of Antarctica on a globe). There are no flights that will ever circumnavigate you over Antarctica cause that is impossible.
1+1 isn't always 2. In your case 1 mom and one dad paired to make a half wit.
Go to a flat earth convention and realize that not one of them was stupid enough to get the covid shots or follow plandemic regulations. Do not go to 'flat earth society' meetups, they are government funded shills. You are too far gone to ever overcome the globe deception unfortunately.
Keep watching your fake images of Earth and teslas floating in space. Just don't get confused when you see more convincing sci-fi movies, those are fake ad well.
The video with the glass firmament I found interesting cause I'm not sure if the sun is inside or outside the dome, this would effect the optics and it demonstrated (crudely) how the dome can dispurse the light over roughly half the flat earth.
I have actually worked in alaska for 7 years where we get 24 hour sun for a month or so. This is possible on the flat earth model when the sun is near the tropic of cancer. 24 hour sun in the Antarctic is impossible on flat earth and consequently I've never seen video that proves it occurs down there.
You seem to have exactly the same hang ups with flat earth that I had. Unfortunately they are hard to explain like this. I'll give you a few resources to check out I think you will find entertaining even if it turnes out to be BS.
OddTV on youtube Eric Dubay on bitchute Flat earth clock App by blue water bay
You are definitely asking the right questions
BTW, I would have scoffed at all this 2 years ago until I realized the moonlandings and international space station is fake.
Ya I agree, I am going with the biblical flat earth model though not all agree.
I cant find it right now but I found a video of a lawyer breaking down how impossible it is to explore Antarctica due to the treaty, and not amount of wealth could accomplish it without military or united nations intervention. And most of Antarctica is literally an ice shelf with a few spots that have peninsulas and rocky terrain.
One thing you might find interesting is Antarctica should have 24 hour sun in the sky just like the north (a few months a year). All Antarctica videos of 24 hour sun have been found to be faked. Also remember daylight is different than sunlight. The sun should be visible 24 hours at both polls for a little while on ball earth.
Sorry I'm drinking and my coherence is faiding.
I cant explain the star trails any better in text form without massive effort, the best I can offer is a video compilation that addresses the subject and can simulate the effect.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyHwsN1Rg4IrFPVauHJV0Vf_kiR2VIWU4
The coriolis effect is 100% BS, they simultaneously claim it affects water and bullets, but not planes or helicopters, this makes no sense. The primary thing that effects the way water rotates when it drains, is the way water is moving already, prior to draining. These demonstrations are actually a tourist scam in equatorial countries to 'prove' coriolis; they can be controlled by how you pour the water.
People have literally documented seeing objects over 200 miles away that should have been under miles of earth curvature, this geometric math is very simple. Here is a playlist for seeing too far:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEzivhxtxgbsRfA1jEZsHFDJ3JJNeQkkB
Antarctica or the encircling ice landmass cannot be explored independently due to the Antarctic treaty. If you try you will be detected and stopped my one of a dozen militaries from going beyond 60°S. No flights or any other transport circumnavigate Antarctica because it's impossible. If you visit Antarctica, you will be restricted to a scientific or military base and unable to explore. I'm couldn't say how far the firmament base is, or if it's actually an infinite plane, so it's just speculation.
Moon/gravity tides are easier to debunk on globe model, than explain via flat earth model. The best explanations I've heard have to do with the sun and moon having positive/negative charges respectively and tides being a result of their electro magnetic effect on salt water. Also tidal nodes from deep in the earth may have an effect where water flows in and out of our oceans. Here is a tides playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEzivhxtxgbtWbiKTA5VX1VGWcWDyfEaL
No maps are accurate on globe earth because spherical projections can't be accurate on a flat map or surface. No one seems to have a problem with this. Flat earthers have no resources, and much establishment pushback on creating any kind of accurate flat earth map. The gleason style maps appear to be accurate enough that militaries used them in ww2 for navy and aircraft purposes. All commercial flights make far more sense on a flat earth map than they do on any globe map: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyHwsN1Rg4IonuwLhXt4KLB_TT9zo7Qd9
This stuff is so much easier to explain in person with a whiteboard -_-
We do research and understand optics, refraction or the 'horizon thing' as you called it, has a very minimal and inconsistent effect. We view objects far beyond what earth curve or refraction should allow mathematically.
So we have a small and local sun that goes around flat earth as you said. It does tighter circles to the tropic of cancer in northern hemisphere summer, and larger circles to Capricorn in the southern summer. Our atmosphere is not completely transparent, so even incredibly bright lights will fade as they travel thousands of miles away. This is also why we can't see from new york to England with a telescope. Also imagine an object flying away from you overhead, like an airplane. Let's say it's maintaining 35k feet altitude. From your perspective on the ground that plane will appear to decend to the horizon as it get further away and it will shrink in size. The plane isn't decending, it just appears to be. We can't see indefinitely, off the top of my I believe the units are arc angles, and when things are too small we physically can't see them anymore and they shrink into the horizon of our vision. One thing I don't think we've settled is if the sun is inside or outside the firmament, because this can also have optical effects to consider on how daylight and sunlight are distributed (there is a difference in those two lights).
Here are two videos to give you a visual aid.
Alright go back to talking about how Aristotle played with sextants 2000 years before they existed. Your origional post was an obviously stupid premise, and I know you understand that now. Just so ya know when you watch Hollywood movies about space, those are all fake too, I don't want you to get confused since you fall for Nasas tricks.