So we have a small and local sun that goes around flat earth as you said. It does tighter circles to the tropic of cancer in northern hemisphere summer, and larger circles to Capricorn in the southern summer. Our atmosphere is not completely transparent, so even incredibly bright lights will fade as they travel thousands of miles away. This is also why we can't see from new york to England with a telescope. Also imagine an object flying away from you overhead, like an airplane. Let's say it's maintaining 35k feet altitude. From your perspective on the ground that plane will appear to decend to the horizon as it get further away and it will shrink in size. The plane isn't decending, it just appears to be. We can't see indefinitely, off the top of my I believe the units are arc angles, and when things are too small we physically can't see them anymore and they shrink into the horizon of our vision. One thing I don't think we've settled is if the sun is inside or outside the firmament, because this can also have optical effects to consider on how daylight and sunlight are distributed (there is a difference in those two lights).
Ya I agree, I am going with the biblical flat earth model though not all agree.
I cant find it right now but I found a video of a lawyer breaking down how impossible it is to explore Antarctica due to the treaty, and not amount of wealth could accomplish it without military or united nations intervention. And most of Antarctica is literally an ice shelf with a few spots that have peninsulas and rocky terrain.
One thing you might find interesting is Antarctica should have 24 hour sun in the sky just like the north (a few months a year). All Antarctica videos of 24 hour sun have been found to be faked. Also remember daylight is different than sunlight. The sun should be visible 24 hours at both polls for a little while on ball earth.
So I can't see 1000 miles away? But I can see past the atmosphere and see stars far away?
If the sun was moving away, it wouldn't set. It'd just get smaller and disappear in the air above the horizon.
Also, how do you explain some places on Earth having 24 hour days while you claim the sun is moving around? How can the sun pause and stay over one area and still move and light up the other areas? Is there a simulation of this sun movement on the flat earth model?
Those two videos were sloppy. The explanation for the sun setting was silly to me. Unconvincing. The sun model in the bathroom was terribly done. Shining flash lights into a glass dome doesn't explain how some places get 23 hours sunlight in one day.
The video with the glass firmament I found interesting cause I'm not sure if the sun is inside or outside the dome, this would effect the optics and it demonstrated (crudely) how the dome can dispurse the light over roughly half the flat earth.
I have actually worked in alaska for 7 years where we get 24 hour sun for a month or so. This is possible on the flat earth model when the sun is near the tropic of cancer. 24 hour sun in the Antarctic is impossible on flat earth and consequently I've never seen video that proves it occurs down there.
You seem to have exactly the same hang ups with flat earth that I had. Unfortunately they are hard to explain like this. I'll give you a few resources to check out I think you will find entertaining even if it turnes out to be BS.
OddTV on youtube
Eric Dubay on bitchute
Flat earth clock App by blue water bay
You are definitely asking the right questions
BTW, I would have scoffed at all this 2 years ago until I realized the moonlandings and international space station is fake.
Now I'm guessing these space agencies and meteorogical agencies have some sort of system in place using various ground and sea based weather stations to help them come up with these animations. You wouldn't need satellites to see how atmospheric pressure was changing around the world for instance, you just need a network.
However we do have thousands of balloon satellites that can stay aloft for 2 years. Nasa and friends launch these things constantly. I imagine they have all kinds of uses including weather observation.
So we have a small and local sun that goes around flat earth as you said. It does tighter circles to the tropic of cancer in northern hemisphere summer, and larger circles to Capricorn in the southern summer. Our atmosphere is not completely transparent, so even incredibly bright lights will fade as they travel thousands of miles away. This is also why we can't see from new york to England with a telescope. Also imagine an object flying away from you overhead, like an airplane. Let's say it's maintaining 35k feet altitude. From your perspective on the ground that plane will appear to decend to the horizon as it get further away and it will shrink in size. The plane isn't decending, it just appears to be. We can't see indefinitely, off the top of my I believe the units are arc angles, and when things are too small we physically can't see them anymore and they shrink into the horizon of our vision. One thing I don't think we've settled is if the sun is inside or outside the firmament, because this can also have optical effects to consider on how daylight and sunlight are distributed (there is a difference in those two lights).
Here are two videos to give you a visual aid.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BxsiKnuxsIgK/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QbFn6topycHC/
I tell you one thing.
The flat earth dome theory would fit better with the Bible story about the Tower of Babel reaching the heavens.
But the whole idea of a guarded ice wall is kind of strange too.
Ya I agree, I am going with the biblical flat earth model though not all agree.
I cant find it right now but I found a video of a lawyer breaking down how impossible it is to explore Antarctica due to the treaty, and not amount of wealth could accomplish it without military or united nations intervention. And most of Antarctica is literally an ice shelf with a few spots that have peninsulas and rocky terrain.
One thing you might find interesting is Antarctica should have 24 hour sun in the sky just like the north (a few months a year). All Antarctica videos of 24 hour sun have been found to be faked. Also remember daylight is different than sunlight. The sun should be visible 24 hours at both polls for a little while on ball earth.
Sorry I'm drinking and my coherence is faiding.
So I can't see 1000 miles away? But I can see past the atmosphere and see stars far away?
If the sun was moving away, it wouldn't set. It'd just get smaller and disappear in the air above the horizon.
Also, how do you explain some places on Earth having 24 hour days while you claim the sun is moving around? How can the sun pause and stay over one area and still move and light up the other areas? Is there a simulation of this sun movement on the flat earth model?
Those two videos were sloppy. The explanation for the sun setting was silly to me. Unconvincing. The sun model in the bathroom was terribly done. Shining flash lights into a glass dome doesn't explain how some places get 23 hours sunlight in one day.
The video with the glass firmament I found interesting cause I'm not sure if the sun is inside or outside the dome, this would effect the optics and it demonstrated (crudely) how the dome can dispurse the light over roughly half the flat earth.
I have actually worked in alaska for 7 years where we get 24 hour sun for a month or so. This is possible on the flat earth model when the sun is near the tropic of cancer. 24 hour sun in the Antarctic is impossible on flat earth and consequently I've never seen video that proves it occurs down there.
You seem to have exactly the same hang ups with flat earth that I had. Unfortunately they are hard to explain like this. I'll give you a few resources to check out I think you will find entertaining even if it turnes out to be BS.
OddTV on youtube Eric Dubay on bitchute Flat earth clock App by blue water bay
You are definitely asking the right questions
BTW, I would have scoffed at all this 2 years ago until I realized the moonlandings and international space station is fake.
What do you think about this? High resolution footage from satellites https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_S8d_1KVhU
I mean if you couldnt tell it was fake right away at 1:40 sec in when it starts getting all animated it looks fake as hell.
Honestly this scene from star trek with planet vulcan looks more real. https://youtu.be/dnpZeA1s3KY
Now I'm guessing these space agencies and meteorogical agencies have some sort of system in place using various ground and sea based weather stations to help them come up with these animations. You wouldn't need satellites to see how atmospheric pressure was changing around the world for instance, you just need a network.
However we do have thousands of balloon satellites that can stay aloft for 2 years. Nasa and friends launch these things constantly. I imagine they have all kinds of uses including weather observation.
https://youtu.be/tLtfIEwJ4VY
Not trying to take a piss, just honestly what I think.