Let me tell you something... I've hired and worked with enough amazing programmers to know that you are not among their ranks.
The worst, stupidest, and most useless kind of programmer is the one that purposefully overcomplicates simple concepts in order to feel smart.
It's not complicated at all.... It can be broken into a simple chart.
https://byjus.com/gate/difference-between-high-level-and-low-level-languages/
High level languages: One does not require a knowledge of hardware for writing programs.
Low level languages: Having knowledge of hardware is a prerequisite to writing programs.
You've wasted 2 days on this subject trying to tell me an LLM will never be able to do anything useful in the field of coding because it can't know and remember every piece of hardware in existence... and your only argument is "low level languages exist"....
As if I didn't already know that.
As if java and PHP coding jobs alone are not worth 10s of billions of dollars per year.
What a joke of a point you've wasted 2 days making. I'd fire you IRL for that kind of stupidity.
You seem to not be understanding my point... I'm not evaluating nor disputing your evidence.
The point I'm making is that reddit has a good reason to ban this post without evaluating the evidence as well.
For example... The "trust and safety" team at reddit would look at that post and conclude that it could make the people being named targets for attacks and harassment. They are mandated by their employer with taking down content that fits that criteria... It's stupid I know, and I'm not defending the practice. But they do it anyways.
Next, the legal team at reddit is gonna look at a post like this and realize all the people being named are able to call in vast legal resources to sue the shit out of them.
So that's why I say regardless of the names being named, or whether or not they actually rule the world, reddit is taking that post down either way.
But just on a side note about your evidence... nobody can digest such a massive text ball presented in jpeg format. Consider a format that's more easily readable for such large text dumps.
oh yeah, and i already named space as not having a shape.
by redefining "shape" to include empty space.
but even if i accepted your new definition (i don't), it doesn't apply to the earth since the earth is not empty space.
if all shapes have an edge, where is the edge of space? what "shape"is space? (1)
A shape is only a shape because it contrasts with empty space... That's why shapes have edges and empty space does not.
All shapes have edges bud... Every single one... 2D and 3D
those are your bullshit words, proven not true with just a few simple sentences.
Name the shape that has no edge.
anyway, serious question here, how do people explain the sunset on a flat earth?
Like total idiots you imagine the sun hovering above the ground, held up by nothing, and circling around nothing, with nothing to power it's movement, in a system where gravity doesn't exist.
Speaking of that... The scientific theory of gravity NECESSITATES spherical planets and stars, and also correctly predicts their motion relative to each other.
And the flat earth explanation of "density" is so laughably dumb it can be dismantled in 2 points. And unlike you, when I say I can dismantle an argument, I actually do it.
1.) The flat earth idea of "density" only posits an assumption that things of differing densities will move apart relative to each other, but it doesn't even attempt to explain how or why they always move in a single cardinal direction relative to the ground, or how such a cardinal direction became established in the first place. Gravity can and does explain that.
2.) The "experiments" flat earthers do to try and demonstrate their idea of density like the oil and water mixture actually demonstrate gravity, because those same experiments don't work in space. The liquids wont even stay in the tub. They will float around in the air..
The idea of "density" posits that it's the relative properties of oil and water that keeps everything in the bucket and causes them to separate.
But their relative properties are not changed by being 300 miles up in the sky... And yet going that high will cause all the liquids to float around in the air with no sense of up or down.
3.) (BONUS POINT).... The flat earth idea of density would mean the sun would fall out of the sky since the sun (which is full of energy producing material) is denser than the air, and denser than the empty space above that. So your model of how the sun rises and sets is in direct contradiction with your model that explains how objects fall to the ground.
How did they make it stupid? And wasn't it already legal to put a body in the ground? What am I missing here?
Personal computing is not the entire existence of computing
And nobody ever said LLMs would replace all coders for the entire existence of computing, or that every piece of code works on every piece of hardware....
Shove your technobabble up your ass... You clearly have no idea what you are even trying to argue.
I can disprove you in 30 seconds by asking ChatGPT to write me some simple code, and it will fucking work without having to tell it my hardware.
If I wanted to reveal personal info, I could disprove you in 10 seconds by simply uploading receipts from actual skilled developers (not like you) who I have paid thousands of dollars to write custom programs for me... and they did it without needing a map of my hardware, and still produced software that can run on every computer I own.
Why is this possible? Because for the 5th fucking time PC architecture is standardized and has been for 20 years.
Shove your ARM chips up your ass.... They don't disprove anything I've said, as they are just another STANDARD type of architecture.
One comes from a Q drop
So an unsourced jpeg from an anonymous 4chan user is proof?
Your post, your homework. Either you produce the proof or you don't. Not my job.
x64 has been the universal standard standard since 1999 genius.
So no you do not need to custom tailor all your code for specific hardware, you lying gatekeeping buffoon.
Now tell me how wrong I am because there are so many people who need to develop a Sega Saturn app in assembly language that utilizes its dual processors properly, and PC programming is somehow irrelevant....
numerology is for retards, because it assumes significance in random noise that exists everywhere.
in that post I linked to are experiments you can run that will make it produced bad info...
but it's very good at making that bad info sound correct.. it will not sound like gibberish even if it is.
but pay attention and and fact check its answers. The point is it's not designed to give you answers. it's designed to generate words on a page.
Btw, why do you believe flat earth would have an edge?
All shapes have edges bud... Every single one... 2D and 3D.
You're just proving more and more how ridiculous your ideas are if you're going to tell me you believe in an edgeless shape.
Yes.... Inject yourself with HIV blood.
Case closed.
No wait... I'm sorry... You're not a science denier...
You're the science pope... The science's vicar on earth relaying it's truths and denouncing the false profits of virology, who are heretics, and not real science followers.
All hail the science pope... Knower of the one true science... Please ohh great one, you are so wise I beg of thee to tell me what medical decisions I should make.
Controlled scientific experiment proves viruses do not exists.
So scientists have devised a magical experiment capable of defying the laws of logic by proving a negative... huh?
The Final Refutation of Virology
https://odysee.com/@Scamdemic:7/the-final-refutation-of-germ-theory:e
The final refutation to 20 a min monologue linked to by a science denier...
https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/17t1fVIXe0/the-bullshit-asymmetry-principle/c
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/no-true-scotsman
"There's no science showing that viruses are real"
"Virology is the science that studies them..."
"There's no TRUE science showing that viruses are real"
https://www.ggarchives.com/Influenza/TheRosenauExperiment-1918-1919.html
Cool now show me it being replicated and verified by independent researchers... otherwise you can stick that one off unrepeatable experiment back up your ass where it belongs.
BTW bud... The horizon is absolutely curved and you can see it with your naked eye.
You can observe it's curve by noting that it (the horizon) wraps around you 360 degrees in a perfect circle, and comes back to where it started.
That's one curve you can observe.
Then you will also be able to observe that the circumference of the circle drawn by the horizon increases the higher up you go, and decreases the closer to the ground you are, but is still always perfectly circular...
This shows that the ground is curving downwards away from you in all directions.
Both curves are that of a perfect circle... Each one curving on a different axis both uniform and identical everywhere on the planet.
On flat earth there would HAVE TO be parts of the planet with a non-uniform horizon in order to account for the edges...
And yet there is no evidence of any part of the world where the horizon isn't uniform and identical to everywhere else, and no-one has observed an edge anywhere.
If we go down this road, You'll tell me I'm stupid for basing my argument on 100+ years of established scientific consensus and practiced medicine, and yet on the other hand you are smart for basing your argument on personal incredulity, and your own intuition not supported by any credible peer reviewed science, since they are all liars anyways.
So why bother even trying to bring up evidence when your argument fundamentally relies on the premise that all the evidence available is fake?
Sophistry.... plain and simple.
Well now I'm just not gonna take you seriously, because you are spitting out claims that directly contradict with my firsthand experience and direct knowledge of the sickness...
At 30+ years old when I caught it, I could most definitely feel that my body was dealing with something it had never encountered before.
On paper both alcohol and pills can cause the same symptoms... Dizzyness, slurred speech, blurry vision, light headedness...
But in reality your body can easily feel the difference between being drunk and being on pills.
I could tell the difference. When I caught covid it was something new... And I saw it effect my family in ways no cold ever has before too.
When having it code scripts the longer the chat goes on the more likely it is to fuck shit up...
After a few tries you need to take the script it's already given you and paste it into a new chat with more refined instructions, based on what you already learned from the previous chat and the iterations it produced.
Eventually it will give you something functional.
AI wasn't made for what you're trying to use it for and so that's why you're getting bad results.
See here: https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/17t1yBRJzD/the-unreliability-of-ai/c
Hardware has had a pretty much universal standard architecture for over 20 years, idiot.
Show me more irrelevant technobable that has jackshit to with the limitations of an LLM....
You sound like a low level freelance programmer who's just mad your job is going away, and you're not smart to be in the high level bracket that can't be replaced... just yet. Cope and seethe.
I will not waste my time debating geometry and physics with someone that can't define "shape".
That's just about as pointless as trying to debate gender and biology with someone who can't define "woman".