BTW bud... The horizon is absolutely curved and you can see it with your naked eye.
You can observe it's curve by noting that it (the horizon) wraps around you 360 degrees in a perfect circle, and comes back to where it started.
That's one curve you can observe.
Then you will also be able to observe that the circumference of the circle drawn by the horizon increases the higher up you go, and decreases the closer to the ground you are, but is still always perfectly circular...
This shows that the ground is curving downwards away from you in all directions.
Both curves are that of a perfect circle... Each one curving on a different axis both uniform and identical everywhere on the planet.
On flat earth there would HAVE TO be parts of the planet with a non-uniform horizon in order to account for the edges...
And yet there is no evidence of any part of the world where the horizon isn't uniform and identical to everywhere else, and no-one has observed an edge anywhere.
hey, i'm gonna scholl you real quick, but try not to be super offended. you cant teach me, i already know all the shit you would regurgitate. you have to go further.
anway, you do it again with the half logic...
if all shapes have an edge, where is the edge of space? what "shape"is space?
(1)
If you believe space can go for infinity, and you believe space is constantly expanding, then you also would believe that land steches for infinity, if pop science and culture told you to.
So, the land could go forever; thats not a shape. (2)
Also, if it is not known what shape something is, it does NOT mean it does have a shape. that is an unproveable theory, not a rule. (3)
so 3 points, all them cast doubt on your theory you think it a fact, no, not all things have a shape. but i get why you think that, its easy to overlook the aceptions i brough up, even though they are possible acceptions, they are not intuiive and no one would teach you to remember this for a test.
All shapes have edges bud... Every single one... 2D and 3D
those are your bullshit words, proven not true with just a few simple sentences. does that make you want to listen to me? no.
even though you cant explain the anything about flat earth, the points people actually make against the mainstream space and globe belief system we were raised with...anyway, serious question here, how do people explain the sunset on a flat earth? why do we have seasons? do you even know the total basics of the argument?
yet, you believe everthing you think without proof because hwhy would they lie? and how could the lie? valid points, but still a pretty shakey place to hang your hat, imo.
How does one take the venture to discover flat earth proofs and how does one question what they thing is obvious? you just fucking do it, for the throughness of knowing the truth once and for all, because fuck beleiving wehat someone else tell you.
if all shapes have an edge, where is the edge of space? what "shape"is space? (1)
A shape is only a shape because it contrasts with empty space... That's why shapes have edges and empty space does not.
All shapes have edges bud... Every single one... 2D and 3D
those are your bullshit words, proven not true with just a few simple sentences.
Name the shape that has no edge.
anyway, serious question here, how do people explain the sunset on a flat earth?
Like total idiots you imagine the sun hovering above the ground, held up by nothing, and circling around nothing, with nothing to power it's movement, in a system where gravity doesn't exist.
Speaking of that... The scientific theory of gravity NECESSITATES spherical planets and stars, and also correctly predicts their motion relative to each other.
And the flat earth explanation of "density" is so laughably dumb it can be dismantled in 2 points. And unlike you, when I say I can dismantle an argument, I actually do it.
1.) The flat earth idea of "density" only posits an assumption that things of differing densities will move apart relative to each other, but it doesn't even attempt to explain how or why they always move in a single cardinal direction relative to the ground, or how such a cardinal direction became established in the first place. Gravity can and does explain that.
2.) The "experiments" flat earthers do to try and demonstrate their idea of density like the oil and water mixture actually demonstrate gravity, because those same experiments don't work in space. The liquids wont even stay in the tub. They will float around in the air..
The idea of "density" posits that it's the relative properties of oil and water that keeps everything in the bucket and causes them to separate.
But their relative properties are not changed by being 300 miles up in the sky... And yet going that high will cause all the liquids to float around in the air with no sense of up or down.
3.) (BONUS POINT).... The flat earth idea of density would mean the sun would fall out of the sky since the sun (which is full of energy producing material) is denser than the air, and denser than the empty space above that. So your model of how the sun rises and sets is in direct contradiction with your model that explains how objects fall to the ground.
BTW bud... The horizon is absolutely curved and you can see it with your naked eye.
You can observe it's curve by noting that it (the horizon) wraps around you 360 degrees in a perfect circle, and comes back to where it started.
That's one curve you can observe.
Then you will also be able to observe that the circumference of the circle drawn by the horizon increases the higher up you go, and decreases the closer to the ground you are, but is still always perfectly circular...
This shows that the ground is curving downwards away from you in all directions.
Both curves are that of a perfect circle... Each one curving on a different axis both uniform and identical everywhere on the planet.
On flat earth there would HAVE TO be parts of the planet with a non-uniform horizon in order to account for the edges...
And yet there is no evidence of any part of the world where the horizon isn't uniform and identical to everywhere else, and no-one has observed an edge anywhere.
Btw, why do you believe flat earth would have an edge? You believe that flat earthers think there is a disc floating in space?
Wow, I forget how easy it is to trick people. Flat earth is a psy op, no doubt. Ask yourself why.
You don't prove flat earth, you disprove the globe theory. But it doesn't mean you know what shape the earth is, or if there is an edge.
You have to apply math, logic, reasoning and most of all, deprogram.
It's a fools belief that flat earthers are stupid, it's the other way around. Are you surprised?
All shapes have edges bud... Every single one... 2D and 3D.
You're just proving more and more how ridiculous your ideas are if you're going to tell me you believe in an edgeless shape.
hey, i'm gonna scholl you real quick, but try not to be super offended. you cant teach me, i already know all the shit you would regurgitate. you have to go further.
anway, you do it again with the half logic...
if all shapes have an edge, where is the edge of space? what "shape"is space? (1)
If you believe space can go for infinity, and you believe space is constantly expanding, then you also would believe that land steches for infinity, if pop science and culture told you to.
So, the land could go forever; thats not a shape. (2)
Also, if it is not known what shape something is, it does NOT mean it does have a shape. that is an unproveable theory, not a rule. (3)
so 3 points, all them cast doubt on your theory you think it a fact, no, not all things have a shape. but i get why you think that, its easy to overlook the aceptions i brough up, even though they are possible acceptions, they are not intuiive and no one would teach you to remember this for a test.
those are your bullshit words, proven not true with just a few simple sentences. does that make you want to listen to me? no.
even though you cant explain the anything about flat earth, the points people actually make against the mainstream space and globe belief system we were raised with...anyway, serious question here, how do people explain the sunset on a flat earth? why do we have seasons? do you even know the total basics of the argument?
yet, you believe everthing you think without proof because hwhy would they lie? and how could the lie? valid points, but still a pretty shakey place to hang your hat, imo.
How does one take the venture to discover flat earth proofs and how does one question what they thing is obvious? you just fucking do it, for the throughness of knowing the truth once and for all, because fuck beleiving wehat someone else tell you.
A shape is only a shape because it contrasts with empty space... That's why shapes have edges and empty space does not.
Name the shape that has no edge.
Like total idiots you imagine the sun hovering above the ground, held up by nothing, and circling around nothing, with nothing to power it's movement, in a system where gravity doesn't exist.
Speaking of that... The scientific theory of gravity NECESSITATES spherical planets and stars, and also correctly predicts their motion relative to each other.
And the flat earth explanation of "density" is so laughably dumb it can be dismantled in 2 points. And unlike you, when I say I can dismantle an argument, I actually do it.
1.) The flat earth idea of "density" only posits an assumption that things of differing densities will move apart relative to each other, but it doesn't even attempt to explain how or why they always move in a single cardinal direction relative to the ground, or how such a cardinal direction became established in the first place. Gravity can and does explain that.
2.) The "experiments" flat earthers do to try and demonstrate their idea of density like the oil and water mixture actually demonstrate gravity, because those same experiments don't work in space. The liquids wont even stay in the tub. They will float around in the air..
The idea of "density" posits that it's the relative properties of oil and water that keeps everything in the bucket and causes them to separate.
But their relative properties are not changed by being 300 miles up in the sky... And yet going that high will cause all the liquids to float around in the air with no sense of up or down.
3.) (BONUS POINT).... The flat earth idea of density would mean the sun would fall out of the sky since the sun (which is full of energy producing material) is denser than the air, and denser than the empty space above that. So your model of how the sun rises and sets is in direct contradiction with your model that explains how objects fall to the ground.