if all shapes have an edge, where is the edge of space? what "shape"is space? (1)
A shape is only a shape because it contrasts with empty space... That's why shapes have edges and empty space does not.
All shapes have edges bud... Every single one... 2D and 3D
those are your bullshit words, proven not true with just a few simple sentences.
Name the shape that has no edge.
anyway, serious question here, how do people explain the sunset on a flat earth?
Like total idiots you imagine the sun hovering above the ground, held up by nothing, and circling around nothing, with nothing to power it's movement, in a system where gravity doesn't exist.
Speaking of that... The scientific theory of gravity NECESSITATES spherical planets and stars, and also correctly predicts their motion relative to each other.
And the flat earth explanation of "density" is so laughably dumb it can be dismantled in 2 points. And unlike you, when I say I can dismantle an argument, I actually do it.
1.) The flat earth idea of "density" only posits an assumption that things of differing densities will move apart relative to each other, but it doesn't even attempt to explain how or why they always move in a single cardinal direction relative to the ground, or how such a cardinal direction became established in the first place. Gravity can and does explain that.
2.) The "experiments" flat earthers do to try and demonstrate their idea of density like the oil and water mixture actually demonstrate gravity, because those same experiments don't work in space. The liquids wont even stay in the tub. They will float around in the air..
The idea of "density" posits that it's the relative properties of oil and water that keeps everything in the bucket and causes them to separate.
But their relative properties are not changed by being 300 miles up in the sky... And yet going that high will cause all the liquids to float around in the air with no sense of up or down.
3.) (BONUS POINT).... The flat earth idea of density would mean the sun would fall out of the sky since the sun (which is full of energy producing material) is denser than the air, and denser than the empty space above that. So your model of how the sun rises and sets is in direct contradiction with your model that explains how objects fall to the ground.
gravity is little a, in every equation. you can just replace acceration and done., no need for a gravity.
its not a force, its not provable, not viewable, and everything about objects moving up and down in the media, we call air, which is like very thin water, is explained by boyancy and electrostatics, the magnetic preference of objects to fall down to the ground. way above your pay grade still. you beleieve in grabity. got a long way to go to get out of this, but your first mistake is thinking you are teaching...you cant learn that way.
oh yeah, and i already names space as not having a shape. there is one. open space, doesnt have an end, so, it cannot be shape. like infinity land. that would also have no shape. but you beleive in space, because you have been told to beleive in space. not any other reason. and that means you cant imagine that space is not real. you cant image those little dots of light at night, are just little dots. because you have been told what they are.
last thing, you must watch too many flat earth psy op channels, I am not a flat earther, i dont know any. i just call out bad theory. and the heliocentric model, cant hold up to math or scientific method.
but do you realize how much rides on this decpetion? if the earth isnt a globe, what is the place? and ifs not a globe, then its not in space...then is the earth really billions of years old? that begs a new question, how did we get placed here, and who is outside of these walls.
all crazy talk to the brainwashed mind. good luck. try listening
Space is not empty. And if you believe what you've we've told, expanding for Infinity.
The shape is constantly changing.
What about the shape of radio waves or light photons as they expand form the source, always changing, undefined.
Now, your best argument against all the hundred of debunks against the globe is that everything must have a shape.
It's kinda weak, and doesn't address any evidence, plus, you forgot to address any point I made.
but I think I was at least able to place doubt on the rule that everything has a shape, and you can then stop assuming that every else I says be wrong because I said that land might never end.
This isn't exactly going anywhere, 😔, thanks for your concern but I'm not going back to being a brainwashed, institutionalized, space fan
A shape is only a shape because it contrasts with empty space... That's why shapes have edges and empty space does not.
Name the shape that has no edge.
Like total idiots you imagine the sun hovering above the ground, held up by nothing, and circling around nothing, with nothing to power it's movement, in a system where gravity doesn't exist.
Speaking of that... The scientific theory of gravity NECESSITATES spherical planets and stars, and also correctly predicts their motion relative to each other.
And the flat earth explanation of "density" is so laughably dumb it can be dismantled in 2 points. And unlike you, when I say I can dismantle an argument, I actually do it.
1.) The flat earth idea of "density" only posits an assumption that things of differing densities will move apart relative to each other, but it doesn't even attempt to explain how or why they always move in a single cardinal direction relative to the ground, or how such a cardinal direction became established in the first place. Gravity can and does explain that.
2.) The "experiments" flat earthers do to try and demonstrate their idea of density like the oil and water mixture actually demonstrate gravity, because those same experiments don't work in space. The liquids wont even stay in the tub. They will float around in the air..
The idea of "density" posits that it's the relative properties of oil and water that keeps everything in the bucket and causes them to separate.
But their relative properties are not changed by being 300 miles up in the sky... And yet going that high will cause all the liquids to float around in the air with no sense of up or down.
3.) (BONUS POINT).... The flat earth idea of density would mean the sun would fall out of the sky since the sun (which is full of energy producing material) is denser than the air, and denser than the empty space above that. So your model of how the sun rises and sets is in direct contradiction with your model that explains how objects fall to the ground.
oh jeez, this is mess.
gravity is little a, in every equation. you can just replace acceration and done., no need for a gravity.
its not a force, its not provable, not viewable, and everything about objects moving up and down in the media, we call air, which is like very thin water, is explained by boyancy and electrostatics, the magnetic preference of objects to fall down to the ground. way above your pay grade still. you beleieve in grabity. got a long way to go to get out of this, but your first mistake is thinking you are teaching...you cant learn that way.
oh yeah, and i already names space as not having a shape. there is one. open space, doesnt have an end, so, it cannot be shape. like infinity land. that would also have no shape. but you beleive in space, because you have been told to beleive in space. not any other reason. and that means you cant imagine that space is not real. you cant image those little dots of light at night, are just little dots. because you have been told what they are.
last thing, you must watch too many flat earth psy op channels, I am not a flat earther, i dont know any. i just call out bad theory. and the heliocentric model, cant hold up to math or scientific method.
but do you realize how much rides on this decpetion? if the earth isnt a globe, what is the place? and ifs not a globe, then its not in space...then is the earth really billions of years old? that begs a new question, how did we get placed here, and who is outside of these walls.
all crazy talk to the brainwashed mind. good luck. try listening
by redefining "shape" to include empty space.
but even if i accepted your new definition (i don't), it doesn't apply to the earth since the earth is not empty space.
Space is not empty. And if you believe what you've we've told, expanding for Infinity.
The shape is constantly changing. What about the shape of radio waves or light photons as they expand form the source, always changing, undefined.
Now, your best argument against all the hundred of debunks against the globe is that everything must have a shape.
It's kinda weak, and doesn't address any evidence, plus, you forgot to address any point I made. but I think I was at least able to place doubt on the rule that everything has a shape, and you can then stop assuming that every else I says be wrong because I said that land might never end.
This isn't exactly going anywhere, 😔, thanks for your concern but I'm not going back to being a brainwashed, institutionalized, space fan
I will not waste my time debating geometry and physics with someone that can't define "shape".
That's just about as pointless as trying to debate gender and biology with someone who can't define "woman".