Apparently, there was a huge larp ceremony for "the fallen" which mischieviously blamed Trump supporters despite ZERO / NONE / NADA of these police actually being killed by Trump supporters. We blame Trump supporters for mysterious suicides, now. Did Trump cause all Hillary's friends to commit suicide as well?
https://twitter.com/CWBOCA/status/1611386468718546953
Cause of death:
Brian Sicknick: Natural causes.
Howard Liebengood: Suicide.
Gunther Hashida: Suicide.
Kyle DeFreytag: Suicide.
Jeffrey Smith: Suicide.
Billy Evans: Killed by an Islamist months later. Yet commemorated in ceremony that blamed Trump supporters.
I'm over covid
I keep my 45 loaded
in case karens get pointed
the fake vaccines are jew poison
people act foolish
like believing that they voted
Covid is just noise if
everyone really knows it's
The jews, fake news and the truth they omit
copious amounts of adreno-chrome hits
legions of demons, museums of holohoaxes
gain of function research and it is bogus
How ACE2 receptor doesn't bond with covid in ashkenazi hostess
But inside white Caucasians it is most potent
Impale jews for using a bio-weapon
and torture them into dying confessions
piano man take me out...
It's organized by Jew operations such as "Open Society."
Jews. It's the fucking jews. This is why people are INTELLIGENTLY "anti-Semitic." It's because those people did the fucking research and found out jews are behind this shit.
Everyone else just imagines it's republicans or democrats or make believe bad guys like the boogie man "deep state" or nameless "globalists" who they never identify.
IT IS THE FUCKING JEWS!!!! It's why they've been kicked out of over one hundred nations many times over. Your white ancestors were smart and honest. They despised jews for good reason and you should respect your white ancestors more than you grovel for acceptance from jews in modern sick culture.
People started posting that Ashli Babbitt was a crisis actor or else never existed and at that point people stopped caring.
If she is real person who was murdered then a great injustice has been done to her and her memory.
I also find it suspicious that more jan six protesters haven't come forward and told their stories. I suspect that lots of the plea deals or court orders included gag orders preventing them from publicly speaking about the incident or trial without consequence.
There were police officers behind Ashli Babbitt that could have just grabbed her and restrained her. Also, a police officer is supposed to always give a final warning before just licking off shots. You give the opponent a last chance to fully surrender when you say OR I WILL SHOOT!!!! Even I have done this to people i caught on my property. STOP OR I WILL SHOOT! And I mean it. And they stop. And then they get to live.
The four officer "suicides" is suspicious as hell.
I count 2 Trump supporters having heart attacks, One Trump supporter shot in the face, Four cops commit suicide?
Seven dead in total?
The only one who was killed by act of violence was a military veteran female who was shot in the face without warning. Yet we are supposed to cry over George Floyd? This woman wasn't even given a warning "Stop or I will shoot!" Just BANG with cops standing behind her who could have just grabbed her and restrained her without deadly force?
Not to mention the videos who claimed the thing was a big staged performance with actors and fake blood or lack thereof.
The four suicided cops is most strange to me. What is the normal ordinary suicide rate for capitol police officers?
I have no national justice system I want to defend. Perhaps we can avoid criticism of USA justice system by arguing another nation's justice system is comparatively worse? This would not bring any peace of mind and is like saying we should not criticize republicans because arguably Democrats are worse.
You avoided the question.
I do not pretend to be an expert. I ask you.
What does it mean to be American?
Why are you taking criticism of the selective enforcement of justice inside the United States so personal? I do not hold you personally liable for the long-term and sophisticated destruction of the American justice system. Why are you defensive and demanding my credentials? Do I need to be a journalist from CNN or have a history degree from a jew university or be a licensed sleezebag attorney to discuss these things?
Perhaps you ARE liable in some way, or you take criticism of your profession personal? Are you an attorney or work inside this justice system that I criticize?
Handing out bibles?
That makes people do what? WAIT? Wait until Jesus comes back? Another 2,000 years?
You could bring salvation to your people NOW! The Wallachian Army Must March Again!
What about the air quality during the commute? The burning of fossil fuel to travel to place of business? The exhaust from buses, trains, and cars to commute? The huge concrete and green footprint of a large office building? The energy wasted to maintain a large office building when people could do same work from home? The overhead of such an office building eating into the profit margins of the company? The spread of infectious disease in large office spaces shared with many others?
There is NO EVIDENCE that the fake vaccine reduces fatality of COVID-19 infection.
So now you admit that there are indeed adverse, negative effects for an unnecessary and ineffective fake vaccine?
Instead we get the occasional "died suddenly."
Very disappointing.
You took the jew jab, Eisenhorn. And then you caught Covid anyways. Then you lied to yourself and said "it would have been worse without the jab." Didn't you, Eisenhorn? That's how you cope.
Every time that democrats / jew media pretend to care about rape i think about all the times they let rapists go in more cases of double standards, selective enforcement of the law, fake outrage, unequal treatment under the law.
Democrat Shafeeq Sheikh only got probation for raping a woman. Democrats celebrated. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2018/08/19/a-jury-convicted-a-doctor-of-raping-a-patient-at-a-hospital-and-sentenced-him-to-probation/
When Benjamin Lawrence Petty, 36, tied up and raped a 13 year old girl, he only got probation! https://newsok.com/article/5581413/rapist-gets-probation-for-attack-on-13-year-old-at-baptist-church-camp-in-oklahoma
But Kavanaguh gyrated his hips at an unknown place at unknown time with no witnesses over 30 years ago!
When three Muslim boys from a nation (Shithole countries Iraq, other two from Eritrea) from which President Trump wanted to better vet immigrants took turns sexually assaulting a five year old white girl in a closet and then urinated on her, they only got probation!!! https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/northwest/article142759434.html
Jews and their Democrat/Republican shills want to bring in more fake refugees so refugee children can sexually assault 5 year old white girls and then urinate on them when they are done!
Democrats let the black gang rapists go with ......PROBATION! 2 Black men sentenced to probation for gang-rape of 13-year-old girl But wahhhh Bret Kavanaugh! http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/04/09/outrage-after-2-men-sentenced-to-probation-for-gang-rape-13-year-old.html
In 1975 Hillary Rodham Clinton represented an accused rapist named Thomas Alfred Taylor - a 41-year-old man accused of raping a 12-year-old girl named Kathy Shelton. "Though he faced 30 years to life in prison, Clinton negotiated a plea deal that sentenced him to just one year in county jail and four years of probation." https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-stands-by-her-defense-of-1975-rape-suspect/ Hillary Clinton called the 12 year old accuser a liar when she stated that she was "fantasizing" the rape and said "children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences and that adolescents with disorganized families, such as the complainant, are even more prone to such behavior."
All these women who cry about rape and MeToo feminism all voted for Hillary Clinton who defended a pedophile who raped a 12 year old girl named Kathy Shelton. Very few people in America have any credibility or behave consistently with what they claim they believe in.
SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT:
Between November 2022 and January 2023, approximately 25 to 30 classified government documents were discovered by President Joe Biden's attorneys in his former office at the Penn Biden Center in Washington, D.C. and in his personal residence in Wilmington, Delaware, dating to his time in the Senate and his vice presidency in the Obama administration. Biden's attorneys discovered the first set of classified documents in a locked closet at the Penn Biden Center on November 2, 2022, and reported them to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), which retrieved them the next day.
Classified documents at Pence’s home, too, his lawyer says https://apnews.com/article/mike-pence-classified-documents-791bba57abaf50377f0938f0d293f36e
The deep state (Garland and fellow jews) won't allow shill presidents and shill vice presidents to retain any classified documents from their own fucking administrations.
Why wasn't CNN present to film and broadcast the FBI searches in the residencies of Pence and Biden? The FBI seems to inform CNN of raids when it is Roger Stone or MaraLago.
Selective enforcement of the law
Unequal enforcement of the law.
Seattle’s hard-Left secessionist movement has claimed its first territory: six blocks in the Capitol Hill neighborhood. https://www.city-journal.org/article/anarchy-in-seattle
Then, in a stunning turn of events, the City of Seattle made the decision to abandon the East Precinct and surrender the neighborhood to the protesters. “This is an exercise in trust and de-escalation,” explained Chief Carmen Best. Officers and National Guardsmen emptied out the facility, boarded it up, and retreated. Immediately afterward, Black Lives Matter protesters, Antifa black shirts, and armed members of the hard-Left John Brown Gun Club seized control of the neighborhood, moved the barricades into a defensive position, and declared it the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone—even putting up a cardboard sign at the barricades declaring “you are now leaving the USA.”
So why didn't Capitol Police on January 6 behave in same manner, and enforce the law equally, and "de-escalate" and abandon their position and hand over the equivalent of six blocks to January 6 protesters?
How can a January 6 defendant be held to maximum penalty for action when he was led to believe that this action was allowed and tolerated because democrats had shown that you can take over capitol buildings and entire blocks and barricade against police without punishment?
And is this not CLEAR EVIDENCE, jury, that the law is being SELECTIVELY ENFORCED which means that the DEFENDANT is NOT TREATED EQUALLY UNDER THE LAW and therefore you must ACQUIT. Government had shown by example that this behavior and these actions were tolerated and not prosecuted. The Defendant relied on the behavior of government and relied on the civil rights legislation that he be held to equal standards under equal laws meant to apply equally to all. When corrupt government CHOOSES AND PICKS WHO IT CONVICTS, YOU MUST ACQUIT
It is not Christian to let Jews run your justice system. They beared false witness against Jesus Christ in the most important trial in human history. They should be banned from holding any position of responsibility in a proper justice system.
What does it mean to be American?
One's best defense in such a scenario in a courtroom might be to prove to the jury that the enforcement of the law is arbitrary, selective, and with a large variation in how it is applied, charged, adjudicated and sentenced.
I believe we could find many other laws that are selectively enforced, such as "racketeering."
We should compile this evidence.
How could someone protesting OUTSIDE the capitol building be charged with parading while democrats were inside the courtroom screaming during Bret Kavanaugh's hearing? Or screaming and picketing and threatening in gathering outside courtroom where Officer Chauvin was convicted?
Why was this law not enforced against protesters and Bret Kavanaugh hearing?
Why weren't the BLM and Antifa protesters outside Kyle Rittenhouse trial arrested for picketing and parading?
Why weren't the protesters at the George Floyd cop trial not arrested for trying to influence judge and jurors? The cop should file for mistrial because people were outside blatantly violating this law and the federal and state police did nothing to enforce the law.
I think that we can make a good case that we are not equal under the law. Jews get the most privilege. Goyim with Jewish lawyers get the second most privilege. Look how many times they let Epstein go, and the media such as CNBC (check my source) covering it up.
Prosecutors pick and choose when and if they want to enforce particular laws and against who. And that's just the first filter to how citizens are treated unequally. But you never hear "equal rights" advocates talk about this.
Then, once a prosecutor uses extreme prejudice who and who not to prosecute and hold to the law, you get a very subjective court trial with bias judges appointed by bias politicians, and juries that are extremely and illegally coached by those judges who are allowed to be tampered with and threatened by democrat protesters and corporate media shills.
Then the sentencing is BS. I remember during COVID that they selectively chose which criminals they wanted to just release from jail and prisons. They were just releasing guys. Not everyone. Selectively, of course.
Politicians commit crimes all the time and are never prosecuted. In fact, I don't even think a sitting member of congress can be charged with low level crimes at all until after they are out of office. Someone fact check me on that.
Chill out
Guys used to just swim nude. Wasn't a big deal because faggots were beaten to death
People used to not be perverted.
Completely taken off the gold standard under Nixon.
Whether or not that was Nixon's choice, i do not know
Also, jews were the ones recording Nixon, not vice versa. The scandal that led to his resignation was bullshit. They released secretly recorded video of Nixon ever since. It is obvious they were secretly recording Nixon. He is recorded saying things he would never say if he knew he were being recorded.
During the NASA anti-gravity scenes/videos, it is obvious they are attached to cables in several videos.
The gig is up.
Wow oh wow wow orgasm soundtrack during fake asteroid missile impact explosion ahhhhhh Blonde bimbos at NASA narrating the fake shit.
I like how in comments people ask why it looks like still picture, not spinning, no stars in the background, etc.
Most people actually believe this fake shit.
The fakery of modern NASA videos must force everyone to question all NASA claims dating back to the moon landing. They're definitely faking it now so how long has the fakery gone on?
This looks fake as a tranny's boobs.
Reminds me of the ridiculous DART project where dumb blonde hair bimbos at NASA supposedly blew up an asteroid with nukes millions of miles away hitting asteroid moving 14000 miles per hour. Women who couldn't repair a disc brake on an old car blew up an asteroid moving 14'000 miles per hour with nukes millions of miles away in space. Lol
Space is fake and gay.
They were transported new another dimension where Jews farm them for organs.
Tying the Knot in the Age of Marriage 2.0 https://weddedabyss.wordpress.com/2009/09/27/marriage20/
Before you take the plunge there are a few things about marriage that you need to be aware of. The institution of marriage as we know it is no more. It has undergone drastic changes in the last 50 years. What used to be a life long commitment, unbreakable barring the most severe circumstances, has been legislated into something entirely new thanks to the lobbying efforts of radical feminists and the divorce industry. In trying to make divorce “fail-safe” for women they have made marriage “unsafe” for everyone.
Marriage today is a temporary union of two individuals where the exit costs are highly asymmetrical. What does that mean? It means that upon the dissolution of the marriage, one spouse (mothers) makes off like a bandit, while the other (Fathers) is pushed into a life of unending poverty, abridged civil rights, and being two paychecks away from arrears, contempt, and prison.
If someone is made to suffer like that upon the divorce, you probably think that he/she deserved it. Perhaps they were a terrible spouse? Perhaps they cheated? If only this was so. Karma, you see, has nothing to do with it. That was the case during the olden days of “fault-only” divorce when the spouse who was at fault for wrecking the marriage got penalized during the divorce. With those old divorces , if the at-fault party was the higher-earning spouse, they were made to pay alimony and surrender many marital assets over to the wronged party. Similarly, if the at-fault party was the homemaker/lower-earner spouse, then they were made to forfeit any alimony and forced to accept a smaller share of the martial assets. Morality was a big factor in who made out better and who made out worse.
Enter Marriage 2.0
During the second half of the 20th century all of the ground rules governing marriage were changed. The laws were changed to such an extent that that we can no longer call it “marriage” as it was known through the millennia. We have to distinguish this mutated institution with a new name. We will call it Marriage 2.0.
Today all that stuff about the moral carrot and stick is out of the window. Basically the higher-earner spouse is always at-fault (i.e. made to hand over assets and pay alimony), and the lower-earner spouse is always the “innocent one” (i.e. gets most of the assets and a cut of the ex’s future salaries). It doesn’t matter if the lower-earner spouse was the one having an affair or is the one filing the divorce. Therein lies the problem with modern family laws. You can be the best breadwinner spouse in the world, take good care of your wife, and stay true to your marriage vows, and you will still get shafted in the divorce. It’s a suckers bet for the good guy.
Here are some things working against you, when you are the primary breadwinner spouse within Marriage 2.0, and your wife decides to walk out (cash out?) on you:
-
Women Filing Majority of Divorces – 75% of all divorces are now filed by wives. Publications like Cosmo love to harp on men for having a “fear of commitment”. Guys must ask themselves, why commit when it’s the other party who can’t live up to the commitment 3/4 of the time?
-
Unilateral Divorce – This is also known as no-fault divorce, with no recourse for men. There is nothing you can do legally speaking to stop a divorce.
-
Domestic Violence Fraud : Men presumed guilty until proven innocent DV laws are now widely used as the “opening chess move” of many divorces against innocent fathers. Once the husband is removed from the primary residence he never comes back, and she gets the primary residence in the asset split. Also known as the Federal VAWA Legislation, this new unconstitutional law has been fraudulently misused by divorcing spouses ever since it came out. There are no equivalent laws to protect men in abusive situations.
-
Decriminalization of Adultery – Adultery is no longer a crime. However the failure to pay alimony to an adulterous spouse is. Go figure.
-
Losing Custody of Children – Custody of the children is most often awarded to the female in family courts. Basically this amounts to: Goodbye Daddy, hello ATM.
-
No enforcement of Visitation Rights – States enforce payment obligations by fathers with an iron fist, however they don’t lift a finger to enforce the other side of the bargain, which is the visitation rights of fathers. If you are going to police one parent’s obligation to pay, why not police the female’s obligation to allow regular meaningful access to the children?
-
Children as Cashcows – The National Organization for Women (NOW) has been continuously lobbying against Shared Parenting bills in many states. Why would NOW do that? What is more equal than shared parenting? The reason is that NOW’s brand of feminism is no longer about equality, but about a zero-sum game for resources. Children are cash-cows, and NOW will be damned if they allow Shared Parenting to stop the cash-flow.
-
No-Fault Alimony – In many states, fault is no longer a factor in awarding alimony. So there are plenty of cases of “spouse-A cheats, but spouse-B pays”. In what other area of contract law does the party breaking the contract gets paid, and the innocent party gets punished? Only in Marriage 2.0!
-
One Sided Alimony: Ok so the ex-wife got used to a certain standard of living, so we will make the ex-husband pay alimony. Fine. But how about the things the ex-husband got used to? Do men have a right to be “accustomed” to stuff too? If not, why not? Shouldn’t there be some sort of reciprocal reverse-alimony payment by the ex-wife in the form of weekly cleaning, a hot meal 7 nights a week, and “romantic companionship” services for the ex-husband? How come one spouse is obligated to provide something that the other was used to during the marriage, and the female isn’t obligated to provide anything?
-
Lifetime Alimony – Contrary to common belief, Alimony isn’t on its way out. There was a period in the 1970’s when no-fault laws were first enacted when a few states put limitations on how/when it could be awarded. However since then there have been a concerted effort by powers that be such as the influential American Law Institute (ALI) for bringing alimony back in a big way. Here is a New York Times article covering the release of a landmark 2002 ALI report which recommended broadening and deepening alimony awards across all 50 states. Right on queue there are now reports of alimony horror stories coming out from many states where the breadwinner Fathers are ordered to pay lifetime alimony. There are also cases like the on in this Wall Street Journal article where long settled divorce cases are re-opened and modified under the new pro-alimony paradigms. Paul Taylor featured in the WSJ story had his ex-wife take him back to court in 2009, three decades after their original 1982 divorce when both parties had agreed to waive all past/present/future alimony. The court reversed that original 1982 divorce judgment and awarded lifetime alimony to the ex-wife. It was ordered that this new alimony be deducted out of Paul Taylor’s pension and paid monthly to a woman he hadn’t even seen in three decades. Mr. Taylor is now in bankruptcy and can look forward to spending his golden years working as a Greeter in Wal-Mart. Equality in action?
-
Paternity Fraud – If you didn’t catch right away that your kids aren’t really your kids but instead were “sired” by some guy that your wife was having an affair with, you are out of luck. What’s worse if your cheating wife divorces you, you can bring the DNA tests to court, and you will still be forced to pay 18-23 years of child support for these kids who are some other guy’s spawn, plus be made to pay for her lawyer as well as your own AND pay for all the associated costs for the DNA test. Read this case of the Toronto man forced to pay child-support for twins that even the court acknowledged are not his but ordered him to keep paying anyway. In no other area of the law do we punish the innocent victim for the conduct of two other people
Even more shocking is a New York Times article about a Pennsylvania man ordered to keep paying child support after his adulterous wife divorced him, and married the very guy she had the affair and conceived the child with. Today the bio-father, the ex-wife, and their bio-child live together under a single roof as a biologically intact family and guess who is still paying them monthly child support? Yes, the cuckold ex-husband still has to pay every month or go to jail. You can’t make this stuff up. Even cuckold porn doesn’t get this vile.
Conclusion
Marriage 2.0 is a very unequal contract where the legal power balance both within the marriage and after the divorce is heavily biased against the Father. Given that this is today’s legal reality why would you want to sign such a one sided contract? There are simply no benefits in marriage for the males under these Marriage 2.0 rules. None whatsoever. Ask yourself now: “What is in it for me?”. If the above hasn’t yet convinced you to avoid this mutated institution that has become a giant legal trap for men, then you owe it to yourself to keep learning more about the risks of saying “I do”.
Large Hadron Collider could have opened portal for hell