1
VicariousJambi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well this is just some retarded he said she said bullshit now so since you haven’t refuted any of my points and keep saying the same thing over and over I’m out.

Later!

1
VicariousJambi 1 point ago +1 / -0

lmao you still haven't addressed my earlier points about the spontaneous creation of organisms, spontaneous creation of non-functional parts, etc. You're simply saying that "I dont know enough" All you're saying is "nuh uh no youre wrong"

So then, educate me, actually counter my points then.

1
VicariousJambi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Go look up intermediary fossils on your own.

I already have, thanks.

It doesn't matter what you or I think they are,

Of course it does. Thinking otherwise would just be an appeal to authority.

what matters is that you understand the theory you are arguing against.

Yes, I agree!

It doesn't need to be an advantage, it just needs to be a non-fatal mutation.

The theory of evolution is what I stated in my first comment. Beneficial genetic mutations over time. Survival of the fittest. A "non-fatal mutation" is a disadvantage. An inefficiency bodily process, a waste of calories that sort of thing. The original entity without the mutation would be at an advantage because it didnt waste energy.

1
VicariousJambi 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dont believe in evolution

Good, me either!

I want you to make better arguments.

Well feel free to reply to what I said, you didn't really counter any of it.

1
VicariousJambi 1 point ago +1 / -0

The downvotes are also only on the top level comments from what I can tell

3
VicariousJambi 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree that the vast majority of time they're made up cgi bullshit just like most other "science".

6
VicariousJambi 6 points ago +6 / -0

yeah apparently all a rifle round point point blank to the head does is blow your hair around a little. It doesnt burst your head open like a fucking watermelon or anything.

3
VicariousJambi 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its just like every other lie they tell. Thy always go to the extremes. Its smaller than you comprehend. Its larger than you can imagine, its further away than you can comprehend.

those aren't cells in the pictures

they are destroyed cells.

1
VicariousJambi 1 point ago +1 / -0

So if you're right about evolution, if you're right that gliding -> wings we should be able to point to examples of this. Since evolution is this on-going, never stopping process we should be able to look around and see some of these inter-mediatory forms in animals that are currently alive.

Please show me one currently existing example of an intermediary form between a glider and a wing.

Also, how would that intermediary from be a useful genetic advantage, anyways? A glider with bones stuck in it is just a shitty glider with extra weight and calories. Thats not an advantage.

Like I said, they're both fully formed functional appendages that both have their uses.

I know exactly how complex single cells are, and what is involved in optics, but overall complexity has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Overall complexity has everything to do with the topic at hand, its a great counter argument to evolution.

If you believe in evolution then I don't think you fully comprehend the likelihood of cells forming in the first place.

I suggest watching this.

Evolution and Dinosaurs Debunked - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtCIp9sgiE0&

3
VicariousJambi 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think so. The article goes into intrusive thoughts normal people think a little bit. It give the example of an intrusive random thought I've personally had and you've probably had something like it too.

"I should drive into the opposite lane of traffic. That might be neat."

Like what the fuck, who thinks that? You obviously don't intend yourself harm. You would never actually drive into traffic.

So whos intent was that?

After you shake your head off of that lie you try to rationalize it somehow, like you were just wondering about it, wondering what would happen if you did..... but thats not really what happened, is it?

I think that if people are honest with themselves they can't say they've never thought that they should kill themselves before. Most "sane" people however are able to easily recognize the lies that try to convince them to kill themselves. You're not a loosh cow to be drank, so you're left alone.

Some people however do believe the lie, for whatever reason. Could be environmental (upbringing, early childhood trauma, just the literal environment you live in) or genetic, probably some of both in most cases.

Luckily whatever the cause it seems like the solution is the same for all.

2
VicariousJambi 2 points ago +3 / -1

I think that negative thoughts attract "demons", who then insert lies into the persons head. Lies like that they are worthless and should kill themselves. Lies that get the person to act in such a manner that they feel negatively. They want the person to believe these lies so they can continue to milk the cow undetected. These lies trigger the persons already negative outlook which to sends them into a negative emotional spiral. These demons do this in order to feed upon negative emotional energy.

4
VicariousJambi 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do you know how they get to those in laboratories?

This video explains the "process" it in depth, but I'll do a real shorthand version.

https://rumble.com/vpw0dm-23-minutes-video.-dr.-tom-cowan-has-shown-that-this-virus-does-not-exist..html

Basically what they do is they take some kidney cells, inject something that destroys the cells, look at the destroyed cells under a microscope and say that the destroyed cells are "viruses" when really they're just corpses of dead kidney cells. They've re-created these experiments with out literally any "virus" sample and its the same result.

1
VicariousJambi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look at all the gliding reptiles, mammals, and marsupials. None of them have fully formed wings, yet find that the excess skin and supporting limbs very useful.

Right, they're useful. They're not wings. They're not a half-formed wing. They're a fully formed feature.

As for eyes, a single cell can be photoreceptive...

I think you're underestimating the complexity behind optics, and the complexity behind a single cell as well.

4
VicariousJambi 4 points ago +5 / -1

Right? I thought that was common knowledge. I personally know someone with depression, and have talked with them in length about it. They used to be on the meds, but hated how they felt when on them. Numb is a good description in a word, but we are able to get more accurate than that with this language.

When on some medication, you really stop feeling. You stop feeling good, too. You get "depressed and anxious" because you don't feel anything. Its more than numb. Its hollow, a void of nothingness. The meds make you not care about anything because you don't feel anything, of course "feeling" like that ticks the "depressed and anxious" boxes.

From talking to that person about it, its 100% fucking demons. The "bad thoughts" come in at the most perfect time to strike the most damage, All it takes sometimes is just one little negative thought to start the downward spiral into a depressive episode. It's like getting pushed off a cliff.

They never intend for themselves to feel bad. If its not their intention to feel bad, then whos intention is it? They are also always tired afterwards.

Demons I tell you, demons.

5
VicariousJambi 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just as a wolf pack will pick off the slow, weak deer in a herd so too will the demons feed off of the person genetically pre-disposed to negative thoughts. I think the same goes for the environmental factors as well. I'm sure there are environments more suited for wolves capturing, ambushing the weak deer. People in the city are more inclined to be leeched off of, be depressed and schizophrenic, because they experience more negativity in the city. They also don't experience as much of Gods beauty in nature.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›