13
posted ago by StormzAComing ago by StormzAComing +17 / -4

Evolution, as we all know, is a conspiracy theory created by the Marxist Darwin gang. But few people know how to fight it other than asking questions such as:

How did life come from non-life?

https://healthaid1.quora.com/What-objects-created-by-the-human-being-few-know-that-they-already-existed-in-nature

Perhaps the better question is, how did nature evolve only a single, simple, insect to have a system we would call gears? Why don't primates? Why don't humans? Aren't we the "most evolved"?

Of course not. We were fearfully and wonderfully made by the God of the universe. And God seems to enjoy leaving Easter eggs in the fabric of reality.

Not only do we have geared insects, we have Trump-hair moths and octopi, blue lobsters, and bacteria that can break down plastic, even though they were not designed to.

Everything has a purpose. Perhaps this is further proof that we are here, not to engage in dubious conversation, but to wake up the sleeping masses from their dreams and awaken them to a brighter future.

As the writer of Ecclesiastes said, for everything there is a purpose, a time appointed under heaven. Isn't that coming into harmony with things today? Everything is falling into place for a wild Awakening!

Comments (60)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
VicariousJambi 1 point ago +1 / -0

So if you're right about evolution, if you're right that gliding -> wings we should be able to point to examples of this. Since evolution is this on-going, never stopping process we should be able to look around and see some of these inter-mediatory forms in animals that are currently alive.

Please show me one currently existing example of an intermediary form between a glider and a wing.

Also, how would that intermediary from be a useful genetic advantage, anyways? A glider with bones stuck in it is just a shitty glider with extra weight and calories. Thats not an advantage.

Like I said, they're both fully formed functional appendages that both have their uses.

I know exactly how complex single cells are, and what is involved in optics, but overall complexity has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Overall complexity has everything to do with the topic at hand, its a great counter argument to evolution.

If you believe in evolution then I don't think you fully comprehend the likelihood of cells forming in the first place.

I suggest watching this.

Evolution and Dinosaurs Debunked - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtCIp9sgiE0&

0
Poiuytrew 0 points ago +1 / -1

I dont believe in evolution. I want you to make better arguments.

1
VicariousJambi 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dont believe in evolution

Good, me either!

I want you to make better arguments.

Well feel free to reply to what I said, you didn't really counter any of it.

0
Poiuytrew 0 points ago +1 / -1

You need to study evolution more, and not argue against the strawman non-evolutionists have set up.

Complexity is not a counterargument to evolution.

Go look up intermediary fossils on your own. It doesn't matter what you or I think they are, what matters is that you understand the theory you are arguing against.

Also, how would that intermediary from be a useful genetic advantage, anyways? A glider with bones stuck in it is just a shitty glider with extra weight and calories. Thats not an advantage.

It doesn't need to be an advantage, it just needs to be a non-fatal mutation.

1
VicariousJambi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Go look up intermediary fossils on your own.

I already have, thanks.

It doesn't matter what you or I think they are,

Of course it does. Thinking otherwise would just be an appeal to authority.

what matters is that you understand the theory you are arguing against.

Yes, I agree!

It doesn't need to be an advantage, it just needs to be a non-fatal mutation.

The theory of evolution is what I stated in my first comment. Beneficial genetic mutations over time. Survival of the fittest. A "non-fatal mutation" is a disadvantage. An inefficiency bodily process, a waste of calories that sort of thing. The original entity without the mutation would be at an advantage because it didnt waste energy.