Its need for food.
jews want you to take it
that should tell you all you need to know
that flat earth thread was full of seethe lmao
It means that very, very evil people have ruled us for at least like 600 years.
Is there any experimental proof to magnets being able to hold in air against the suction force of a vacuum?
Works for me. Just google “earth curvature calculator” there’s more of them
Anyone that actually gives enough of a shit to learn about what we’re talking about has all of the available information we’re already linking.
You don’t need to trust me at all. As a matter of fact, don’t trust me at all.
Look at the sources i’m linking and make up your own mind about it.
I’ve heard this claimed many times, but no one’s ever actually linked me like a working 3d model (or video of the model rather) of the heliocentric solar system / galaxy with the planets and stars accurately spinning in the right patterns and such.
surface tension factors
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
and when surface tension is a negligible factor in the “flatness” of something, say, anything larger than a test tube, then it always appears flat. You wouldn’t say the surface of a swimming pool has any curve to it.
some claim the ball mode is invalid because it is a gas without a container next to a basically infinite vacuum.
That’s exactly what i’m saying. Gravity is a force so weak that bugs can go against it, but so strong it can hold air in against an infinite vacuum? Really?
And i think that last one i linked is the correct video to explain the differences in perception between the hemispheres.
Here you go
Why Can't Everyone See Mount Everest on a Flat Earth? [3mins 5 seconds] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqvH0Y1L41s
It’s a broad concept that sometimes can only really be explained well in videos.
I've heard of the electric universe theory before but I haven't done a deep dive on it, can you recommend a documentary on it?
I would, sure. Never really done a live discussion on it before thought so I probably wont be quite as.... eloquent. But I'd need it to be at a scheduled time or something. I'm busy most of the night tonight, and this weekend in fact. Other than that no idea I'd have to get back to you.
Everything travels to its natural density. Here's a video on the subject
Well you did leave this part out of the quote where I explained why this was incorrect to do. Edit: I see you edited in a comment on it
If you put in 500 meters for the altitude its like saying you're standing on a 500 meter tall building, not that the balls radius is 500m larger. The horizon is 50 miles away because you're up so high in relation to the radius of the earth.
The Calculator would have to have even more variables, altitude above sea level of viewing position and the position of what you're viewing for it to be even more accurate. You can see how that starts to get overly complicated when you get that specific. You probably couldn't even make a calculator out of it since you're not even using a simple ball anymore. They're using 3959 (r) as a constant just to make things simpler.
are you accounting for your geographic altitude (from sea-level) when you use that calculator?
In my original example of the cities, I checked the altitudes for both the place I am and the place I was viewing and they are the same altitude above sea level. If a 3959 mile radius ball (or whatever) is now 3959.5 that isn't gonna change a whole hell of a lot in the numbers. 266 feet is a lot. According to a quick search 1 "story" of a building is 14' tall. 266/14 = 19 Wheres the 19 story building hiding?
I'm not going to summarize a 3 and a 5 min video dude. People are going to either choose to watch them or not.
My city is 500 meters above sea-level, so it shows the horizon as 50mi away.
Thats....... not how that works. If you put in 500 meters for the altitude its like saying you're standing on a 500 meter tall building, not that the balls radius is 500m larger. The horizon is 50 miles away because you're up so high in relation to the radius of the earth. If you scroll down on that page they go over exactly all of the variables of the equation.
What's your reasoning for not seeing objects much further? Why can't I see the Alps from where I am?
Humidity. Eventually theres too much water to see through to get a clear picture of anything. This video goes over this concept in a little more depth.
Why Can't Everyone See Mount Everest on a Flat Earth? [3mins 5 seconds] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqvH0Y1L41s
Here's one.
Pseudo-Scientific Moon Mathe-Magic [3mins 20 Seconds]- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcsazyX1fwg
Here's another
Daylight Debunks the Globe [5mins 29 Seconds] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlNhPXCH5cA
Water is flat argument is flawed by droplet of water, water meniscus surface tension would hold water together in a round shape as it does in free fall state.
This is obvious misinterpretation of whats meant by "water is flat" man, come on.
atmospheric pressure drops w/ elevation which can be observed at high elevations with either pressure gauge or just breathing. for example 4000m in altitude is a loss of ~40% pressure. at some point the pressure approaches zero
This exactly makes sense with the flat earth model and density.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbCGrG0c2gI
What doesnt make sense is that the atmosphere is there at all, with no barrier between it and a vacuum.
In southern hemisphere the moon rises in the sky 'upside down' from the orientation that it is observed in the northern hemisphere (i've witnessed this in australia). this did not occur in europe, north america, asia (which i've also witnessed). i don't see how this rotation and orientation is explained on the firmament earth model.
I'm not 100% sure what you're exactly talking about here, but maybe this video can explain some.
Video on nasa fakery : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmj_SdBURX0&t
Not OP but I can reply about earth curvature calculations.
You can do a search and find earth curvature calculators such as these.
https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/earth-curvature
For an example from my personal experience I can see a city thats 20-30 miles away. Laying down on the beach doesn't really change how much I can see so I'm not gonna bother with the eyesight level differences that the second calculator has, I'm gonna use the first.
So if I plug a number into this calculator, it spits out the amount an object should be hidden... From the bottom up according to the ball model.
20 miles: 0.05052 miles = 266.75 feet
30 miles: 0.11367 miles = 600.19 feet
So that means I shouldn't be able to see the bottom 266 feet of whatever is 20 miles away. I'm not sure exactly where they're getting that, as I can still see all of the beach on that opposing shore. Nothing at all looks like its hidden.
Here's a mega list of videos on Flat Earth I made.
https://communities.win/c/FlatEarth/p/141roCfDT4/resources/c
Anyone that feels like asking questions about the "flat earth model" feel free to shoot them at me and I'll answer as best I can.
I'm aware of these concepts.
You seem like a very nice person.
based