I believe that we and this earth are created. That must just be how it was created.
If we're flat, then that means everything is flat, and facing us. Like saturn and the moon. Why us? Shouldnt some things be at an angle?
Well just because the surface of the earth is flat doesn't mean that the sun and stars are flat as well. We can't tell what they exactly are. If you zoom in on stars they're not even sphereical.
Why doesn't satalite photos of earth show all the contenints at once? I know yall think those are fake. But if they are, then how do satalites work? How would I be using my starlink wifi right now? Or how does your GPS work?
Balloons. They touch on this in the Level Documentary. I watched an in depth one on it once but I cant seem to find it anymore :(
Why wouldnt I fall off the edge. Cant people just fly around the world? That would be a simple way to prove it. People have hobbie planes.
We're not sure whats past the ice wall. Anyone claiming they do doesn't know what they're talking about. We're not sure if its an infinite plane or of it stops somewhere after the ice wall. Normal people aren't allowed to go past, which is why no one has done it in a hobby plane or successfully sailed there.
I haven't watched the video yet (will do), but I recognize that guy's voice. I've seen a video of him where he phones NASA and asks about the SOFIA aircraft/Hubble telescope. He makes a very convincing argument that Hubble may have never existed and that the images we've seen may have come from SOFIA.
I suppose those are reasonable questions given what you've been taught "flat earth" to be. However, "flat earth" doesn't just stop at the surface of the Earth, but puts under question the entire construct (which, I assume, you believe to be an ever-expanding universe with objects floating about).
I suggest you watch How Everything Works on Flat Earth or Level, which is more of a movie-style presentation. You'll find answers to your questions there, and more.
Why would you take the word of this idiot says as 'fact' vs. someone who has taken live video cameras into space from liftoff to space showing a nice, clear image of our ball earth? The amount of stupid in this video is amazing how anyone could be so ignorant of reality.
Why does the flat earth community cling to the earth-curvature formula of:
8" per mile squared
This quadradic is NOT how the earth curvature is measured. If for example, you traveled the circumference of the earth, the real curvature formula would yield 0, because you end up right where you started. Yet the flat earth narrative claims 8" per mile squared would yield not zero but a VERY BIG NUMBER.
That's just an approximation that is practical only for short distances (say, up to 1000 miles). None of the curvature calculators use it, AFAIK. Here's a list of some of them:
Here's a mega list of videos on Flat Earth I made.
https://communities.win/c/FlatEarth/p/141roCfDT4/resources/c
Anyone that feels like asking questions about the "flat earth model" feel free to shoot them at me and I'll answer as best I can.
Late but here are some question.
Why would everything be pointing at us?
If we're flat, then that means everything is flat, and facing us. Like saturn and the moon. Why us? Shouldnt some things be at an angle?
Why doesn't satalite photos of earth show all the contenints at once? I know yall think those are fake.
But if they are, then how do satalites work? How would I be using my starlink wifi right now? Or how does your GPS work?
Lastly. Why wouldnt I fall off the edge. Cant people just fly around the world? That would be a simple way to prove it. People have hobbie planes.
I believe that we and this earth are created. That must just be how it was created.
Well just because the surface of the earth is flat doesn't mean that the sun and stars are flat as well. We can't tell what they exactly are. If you zoom in on stars they're not even sphereical.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr5UjBGO4BA
Balloons. They touch on this in the Level Documentary. I watched an in depth one on it once but I cant seem to find it anymore :(
Edit: I think its this https://www.bitchute.com/video/zwbXBctYHDTg/
We're not sure whats past the ice wall. Anyone claiming they do doesn't know what they're talking about. We're not sure if its an infinite plane or of it stops somewhere after the ice wall. Normal people aren't allowed to go past, which is why no one has done it in a hobby plane or successfully sailed there.
I haven't watched the video yet (will do), but I recognize that guy's voice. I've seen a video of him where he phones NASA and asks about the SOFIA aircraft/Hubble telescope. He makes a very convincing argument that Hubble may have never existed and that the images we've seen may have come from SOFIA.
I suppose those are reasonable questions given what you've been taught "flat earth" to be. However, "flat earth" doesn't just stop at the surface of the Earth, but puts under question the entire construct (which, I assume, you believe to be an ever-expanding universe with objects floating about).
I suggest you watch How Everything Works on Flat Earth or Level, which is more of a movie-style presentation. You'll find answers to your questions there, and more.
Why would you take the word of this idiot says as 'fact' vs. someone who has taken live video cameras into space from liftoff to space showing a nice, clear image of our ball earth? The amount of stupid in this video is amazing how anyone could be so ignorant of reality.
Why does the flat earth community cling to the earth-curvature formula of:
8" per mile squared
This quadradic is NOT how the earth curvature is measured. If for example, you traveled the circumference of the earth, the real curvature formula would yield 0, because you end up right where you started. Yet the flat earth narrative claims 8" per mile squared would yield not zero but a VERY BIG NUMBER.
Isn't this a problem for the FE community?
That's just an approximation that is practical only for short distances (say, up to 1000 miles). None of the curvature calculators use it, AFAIK. Here's a list of some of them:
And here's a graphic that shows how the curvature is calculated.
Ah, thanks for answering for me. I couldn't tell what he was exactly getting at.
The 8" per mile squared is the mainstream FE argument endlessly recycled on the YouTube videos.
You’re not making much sense here, please make a sensible question I can answer.
The question was in the very first sentence.
It is amazing how you people throw these things around with so much ease.
What's a "flat earther" anyway?