I don't understand if that's supposed to be a refutation, but LLMs do not use logic
It's just trained as a word predictor, there is no logic happening
I want to know who is down voting this when it's pretty much the most important thing happening
I generally agree with what you're getting at, but you can't take a chat with a language model as proof or even evidence, of something like this. The fact that so many people do is concerning... AI governance will be celebrated
Someone might do that because they actually have interest in finding the truth, and a clearer picture of that can emerge through dialogue. But you? Since you're very obviously not interested in that I have no answer
You've presented nothing else to refute or debate aside from your behavior itself
You don't have the ability to, so you shouldn't. You've certainly spent enough time that you can't use not having the time as an excuse, but you'd rather spend the time acting like a special, chosen one (narcissistic behavior) and keeping that illusion intact by refusing to actually talk about your ideas. You cared enough about what people thought to make an initial response (though that was also full of insults and contempt to people who don't share your "enlightened" status) and to keep replying, so you obviously care about either what I or what observers think (on top of needing to get your quips in, ego feeding behavior) and perhaps an observer could benefit from viewing this conversation if actual ideas were exchanged. But they wouldn't, because you lack the ability
You obviously idolize Trump with your Qbrained worldview (you will split hairs and say it's not idolization but something else so I don't care to debate this). I find it extremely funny you keep coming back to make quips for that quick dopamine hit but you still have never once actually been able to advocate for your ideas
I tend to agree with not trusting anyone, it is more difficult that way (mentally and emotionally) but it's almost a guarantee that anyone on the world stage is not our friend. Trust is reserved for people you know and faith for God
I think what beef's getting at is there are a lot of reasons to be suspicious of Tulsi and her making this clarifying statement is likely part of the march to war using the same playbook as 2003
Yes you need some small amount of property to do it (though bantams of the right breeds can handle a very, small amount of space) and you need to do a modicum of research and planning to not just get them all killed, but it's rather simple overall
The new thing is showing pictures of chickens or referencing how they were raised. But all conspiracy theorists should be raising their own chickens, they are an incredibly reliable source of incredibly nutritious food and they will do double duty as pest control
I have found that even among "truth seekers" there is a tendency to seek out heroes and to cling to information, no matter how illogical, that aligns with preconceived notions.
It seems to be the default for the vast, vast majority of people
People who don't have the ability to assert their position usually run, so I'm not surprised. You'll see I am very respectful to those who are respectful but I matched your energy and you couldn't handle it. You take "calling someone names" as a reason to avoid dialogue yet you idolize a man who does that to everyone. Typical narcissistic behavior, can dish it out but can't take it back
Ideas should be defended logically, your inability to defend your ideas has nothing to do with me.
But let's step back: "discernment of a fucking protozoa" and then talking about how you'll be relishing thinking of how right you're going to be proven while pretending to take the moral high road. Typical narcissistic behavior of a cult member. Good luck out there, I'll be hoping you wake up from your delusion one day. The unearned feelings of superiority will be hard to give up but I sincerely hope you do
You began your original post with an insult and now you spout off cult buzz phrases. Feel free to actually answer any questions or acknowledge you're in a cult, pretending you're full of "intelligence and discernment" when you cannot defend your ideas against basic questioning would be laughable if it wasn't a hallmark of cult brainwashing
No problem, I think it's important to think critically about everything we read, but in this day and age where we're presented with so much conflicting and incomplete information it can be extremely exhausting in order to do so. It usually requires entertaining many different ideas at once and reevaluating them with each new piece of information. I hope all truth seekers find what we're looking for
I have seen Qtards (which you out yourself as by using the lingo) say this forever but where is the proof ten year lockdowns were ever actually a plan? No documents say that (such as SPARS, Agenda 2030, Operation Lockstep), there was never a mention of it, most of the USA was open by the time warp speed happened. The elections were stolen with some counties reporting over 100% turnout, they did not need mail in ballots because it was just stolen right in front of everyone's face. And if Trump was all they were worried about why not release the virus closer to the elections to ensure he could not "warp speed" us out of it? How does this square up with the fact that Moderna (and possibly others, I don't recall) was already working on a vax for this very virus before it was ever released? Is Moderna a "white hat" operation? If so, why did Trump promote all the vaccines? Why did he keep encouraging people to take them when not being prompted to do so?
Virus mutation goes in the opposite direction, less deadly more contagious. It was about a year before the vaxxes hit the scene, so when was this artificial mutation set to happen? Why let it linger for so long, especially knowing warp speed was happening (it didn't just come out of nowhere, Trump announced he'd be tearing down regulatory hurdles long before the vaxxes were available)
I have seen a lot of writing about why Trump doing warp speed and then continuing to talk about how great the vaxxes are was 69D chess, but none of them have ever stood up to scrutiny. I'd be interested if you could answer my questions and change my mind
I apologize, I hope everything works out
You're unable to entertain that your ideas may be wrong but also unable to back them up intellectually, so you call anyone who contradicts you 'Agent Smith" as a way to keep your worldview unchallenged. That's not unmasking, that's ego defense
Making a reference to a movie (while somehow thinking this makes you "awake") does not in any way lend intellectual credibility to your points. Actually attempting to understand the stuff you're talking about might, but you seem more interested in stroking your own ego
I've done engineering work on AI systems but that's the closest I'll get to doxxing myself
AI doesn't have a will. I urge you to learn how they work
LLMs can process logical statements but are not engaging in a logical process