Regarding my other point, you continue to prove it. You literally don't understand the architecture if you think it's the quality of training data that has anything to do with the system's inability to engage in logic. But you'll keep overrating yourself (like somehow thinking it should be a big deal that you made a poor attempt at a veiled insult), narcissism is big in conspiracy circles these days
Middle school tier retorts, middle school tier understanding of technology. You attempted to attack my ego in hopes of incensing me. People attempting to provoke (instead of debate) go after others in ways they know would get a rise out of themselves. Make of that what you will
Parallel profiling was not used to train "LMM"s.
Regarding my other point, you continue to prove it. You literally don't understand the architecture if you think it's the quality of training data that has anything to do with the system's inability to engage in logic. But you'll keep overrating yourself (like somehow thinking it should be a big deal that you made a poor attempt at a veiled insult), narcissism is big in conspiracy circles these days
I'm not a mirror of yourself.
Middle school tier retorts, middle school tier understanding of technology. You attempted to attack my ego in hopes of incensing me. People attempting to provoke (instead of debate) go after others in ways they know would get a rise out of themselves. Make of that what you will
Said the one who can't look beyond his nose.
Nothing substantive to add but still needing to get the last word. Thanks for continuing to prove my assessment and have fun out there