Same shit different Nazis. I don't think the Jews are any more cruel than the Imperial Japanese were, they are just currently on top.
Wouldn't surprise me. This whistleblower guy seems shady too. This could all be part of a demoralization campaign.
Just remember all politics is local, focus on what you can secure or change locally. That's what they want to distract people from; things that can actually make a difference.
A pretty said indictment of the dominant culture in this country. Feminism, nanny state policies, drug abuse and promiscuity running their course.
Blacks maintain American society?
Well that wraps it up. Blacks bad! We figured out our problems now.
And she is fricken 40 and winning Miss Germany? LOL.
In the exact same way as "gravitation" and for the same reasons. It is defined in the equations, and does not exist in any way outside of them.
I see your point that something has to be postulated and imagined. However, the quality of the assumption with Newton's gravity is much higher with its simplicity and humility. Newton just says in essence "some force" is acting on the object and is related to mass. That's a very reasonable and fairly unassuming unknown left in there. People can postulate it is a field, or the actions of ether or gravitons or w/e, but Newton didn't force them to. Newton was observing physical laws and made math to best describe them.
Newton didn't concoct fanciful new concepts as relativity does. Relativity says "we observe a force on an object, AND the force is a result of this frankenstein amalgamation of two unrelated concepts that leads to all sorts of other problems". Those bizarre physical assumptions lead to a view of the world with strange paradoxes including the absurdity of relative simultaneity which makes it technically impossible to determine cause and effect in the universe. Newton's gravitational calculations only leads to some inaccurate calculations. No mind bending paradoxes that turns physics on its head.
That is the key difference. The level of absurdity and I'd dare say arrogance in trying to make the physical world fit a vision rather than simply trying to describe what is observed.
I just don't get how you can be Mr Alpha 10x, super successful then you chose what looks like a tranny. Is he trying to fit in better with the global elites?
There is ample support for both views
You're right, I do disagree there. The support is mostly illusory. "Gravitational waves" are imagined guesswork based on vibrations in the Earth. Light bending around the sun doesn't happen in "empty space" it only happens through the photosphere where there is atmosphere.
And of course special relativity is not actually used in GPS, since relativity calls for an apparent symmetrical effect, not an asymmetric lasting time dilation.
Space-time is far more "magic" than gravity as a force. Gravity does act as a field force, however mysterious, a field force is a fairly well defined construct. Space-time is undefined. Think about it. How does "space-time" act on me while I'm standing still on Earth's surface? There is no clear coherent explanation from relativists, only convoluted ones. Or how does space-time act on a planet rotating around the sun? It isn't a "force" it isn't a "thing" which even "acts" on anything in any tangible physical way. There is no physical explanation there, it's all conceptual / mathematical.
In physics, something cannot act upon/through nothing
Tell that to Maxwell. That is the basis of electromagnetic force equations which work exceedingly well and describe reality very well. It is far superior to the illogic of space-time.
The "space time" is a mathematical description of the structure of the universe (aka aether).
It is and it isn't. In practice it is, and Einstein admitted it is, but all modern relativists claim relativity does away with an ether. So you have to ask them why they say that and Einstein doesn't.
Also it isn't really a physical description at all. It invents something truly fanciful, the idea that space+time is one object that does "things" to other objects. What those "things" are is not clear. If an object is moving it guides the object into an arc, which is more of an arc than the supposed light bending since otherwise it would appear to move in a straight line. And if you're on a stationary object it still pulls you towards the center just because and the curve space metaphor breaks down. It's a devolution from the idea of a field force. It adds a logically absurd concept of space-time.
Moreover, a given parcel of "space" doesn't contain "time". In Einstein's theory "time" is determined by relative velocity anyway. Space has no knowledge of something's relative velocity to something else.
So, far too many contradictions compared to Newton's straight forward approach with gravity.
I don't know, ask Wendy Williams. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3QCGPYsiEg
For her it was very real. Sudden onset dementia and aphasia (just like Bruce Willis). Count your lucky stars if you didn't get injured or got placebo.
however it is demonstrably useful in some limited cases. Not unlike many newtonian views
I'm not sure relativity and Newtonian physics belong in the same sentence like that. One led to incredible flights of fancy, whereas the other was simply the most accurately description of fundamental actions in our physical universe.
General relativity is very hit or miss (mostly miss) and involves a fanciful invention of space-time. Special relativity is unusable and isn't what GPS uses (despite what relativists claim). Newton's work, on the other hand, was truly foundational and could be built upon.
Also how can she claim there is no evidence the spike protein exists when there is a sequence to produce it and studies done on the isolated protein...
"Intraceller parasite" sounds like a virus with extra steps.
More confirmation that cancer is the way they want to kill the majority of victims. The testimony seems authentic to me. This man was initially pro-vaxx, but later spoke out against it once he woke up.
The creepiest thing is that it seems like something they'd want to use if they were just rounding someone up without trial to be killed.
The conspiracy is they made up a baseless conspiracy to distract from another vaxxident. IMHO. At least until I see any substantial evidence.
Best never to trust a faggoty Hollywood mogul claiming to be on your side.
There is a reason his channel is so popular and never banned.
Murdering Scalia has a proper motive. Murdering a vaxx pushing comedian doesn't. Especially in this situation. Seems like an exceptionally difficult hit to avoid anyone seeing anything, including on the video footage and hotel staff who were aware that Saget was there (one guy took a selfie with him before he died).
By having a weak skull and hitting your head really hard. Or by having a bad backwards fall. Getting up then falling forward onto something.
Or should we believe the hotel staff, the police, and Saget's family were all in on having him killed? The family can access the surveillance footage if they have any doubts. The police saw the footage too. The hotel staff saw who came in or out of the hotel. So what the f are you smoking?
Looks like a horrible edit of a cell phone video.
Cont. Part of a free speech website is the ability to use it anonymously. If payment is required it is no longer anonymous.
I'm sure many people were using / donating anonymously, that way even though they are supporting Gab they are not linking their specific account to their real name that would allow them to be doxxed.
Given how much backlash he is getting from his own users, it looks like he is hurting his company quite seriously.
The gab community has given him other suggestions, like deleting old posts after a few years. That sort of solution would likely lead to far fewer people leaving in protest.
The only evidence of admission I could find was they admitted to using graphene during testing to place samples of the vaccine on.
The other evidence for graphene was at least one or more doctors using Raman Spectroscopy and finding it. I'm skeptical of La Quinta Columna's claims of it being 99% graphene since that would be extremely noticeable and would likely not be a clear liquid with low viscosity. https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-20-la-quinta-columna-vaccination-vial-graphene-oxide.html
But I gave them the benefit of the doubt that perhaps something was lost in translation.
It sounds a lot like Aryanism.