Meta post approved for mod transparency

I am now removing Nazi and goy too.

I will admit my attitude sometimes gets a little too feisty and I should keep that better in check. Well noted.

I'm willing to listen to more input and issues and have been trying to be transparent in moderation and would like that to continue.

What do you propose? I would allow a one time only meta post here for mod transparency.

Rule 1
If you edit I won't remove. Thanks for your help

We are trying to avoid that, thanks for not fighting fire with fire, you are much appreciated!

I removing words like faggot, Nazi, goy, your favorite word, retard, we don't need them and they are abused for derogation and some are even flagged for tracking so they are removed even when not directed at a user. Do you remember Rule 1 back when we had moderators? Well it's back. Get it together please.

I can be sure Jesus wouldn't use those words. Looks like I have some mopping to do.. Your comments that I remove are approvable upon edits. Also please note bans double now.

I will start getting rid of Nazi and goy too because those are be being used derogatorially as well.

I already said make the post. Done here in this thread.

🤣 most of the comments are mine

Then make the post here, almost no one is at the bottom of a 200+ comment thread.

I actually said let's go, we're at the bottom of this thread and I'd rather start fresh so the jury can see.

Ok gross. I'll check your links if you'll take it to the conflict place or you can start a one time only meta post here and I'll approve for mod transparency. I'm done with this thread though.

Then take me to court. Let's find a moderator and get ourselves to c/CommunitiesConflict.

I won't touch mod tools.

New short thread:

JG5:

This is where you look not so discerning. You're running away despite saying you intended to be transparent. I linked a Scored image link that proved your argument was fallacious, and you pretend it doesn't exist.

How benevolent of you...

Me:

I didn't even check where it was from that is how little I care.

No, it is as I just said it was.

I have no desire to have to check your links to see if they are safe and then see what you're talking about, so they will go unanswered by me.

You've both violated site ToS.

Constantly creating new usernames just to pester moderation and you could stop insulting my intelligence but ya know, free will.

Dresden is on his first double for lashing out and breaking the rules, I would prefer you didn't do the same but ya know, free will.

Here, you can use this:
https://files.catbox.moe/e458q4.jpg

Make sure it's in a community I can communicate in.

Then where is the jury of my peers?

It is discernment. Trolling handshakes for the sake of disruption vs established users breaking rules are different scenarios and therefore differently enforced.

Discernment.

Your conflation doesn't match this scenario.

No, it's having wherewithal to understand the situation.

I'm thinking of updating rule 3 but that's about it, everything else is pretty self explanatory.

2 week bans for trolling handshakes, established user bans will be doubling.

It's a work in progress and not as bad as I have seen but yeah, still bad and could be better. Bans double now and he's sitting out.