Removed for rule 1 will be approved upon edit.
Very true, I'm hoping we all have a small team.
A good tip all the same, I'll add this.
Link to 181 pg PDF companion guide:
https://odysee.com/@UrbanOdyssey:b/mahan-companion-v2:5
Silly me, I thought we shouldn't threaten eachother with violence..
Approved per your wishes.
I will keep removing death wishing and if users keep wanting to be death wished I guess I'll approve..
Removed for death wishing. Will be approved upon edit.
Edit: Approved per user who was death wished
I think there is a secular nation of Israel as land, formed in 1948, and there will be a new Israel as land remade by God, which I don't believe has happened yet, as well as Israel as 12 tribes of people that will be called by God to reunite, which could even be happening now.
I think it was a risk not an inevitability.
The problem with Eden is that we can't know how the Lord would have taught us these things 'that way' instead of in our present predicament, but He teaches either way, didn't have to betray Him to learn is my meaning.
Ok good. I do tend to be kinda quickly reactionary, I appreciate the reminder to chill, ha.
Because Yahweh is their adversary/satan. Makes sense.
Ok... :/ I'll go the long way'round.. Still, I can't help the need to refute most things, it's tiring to read because it's twisty. But also I'm just tired, haha, I'll figure it out, thanks.
But the harlot gets thrown out and from scripture, Israel stays and continues war.
It would be easy once the dollar is lost, I think.
And I also think the world is already being shown our weaknesses.
What if America is the harlot?
I wonder more about this being the harlot of babylon being thrown out situation.
Edit: rephrase
I can add to fancy ideas, thanks!
Rule 1 has always been a rule here, moderation has just been out a little while. Shape up or ship out.
Really great info! Thanks!!
Edit: I will add these to the OP in short ish time.
Listen, the rules are simple and free speech doesn't mean free for all, tho you are welcome to make a free for all post and I'll mark and flair it.
I'm not involved in convo, just observing it for violations.
Edit: spelling
Different people have different views and here we attack arguments not people. You are running out of slack for mod griefing and rule 1. (I tend to give some leeway when it's against mod/actions.)
Just stop dude, be reasonable.
There were 3
Reply to you was removed for rule 1, below is the argument.
Argument:
the stars and constellations are different in Australia vs. USA which is impossible if we are all on a flat plane looking up. You claim to have a friend on the east coast and you are in europe, so
Measure Polaris from two latitudes. The simplest way to get astronomic latitude in the Northern Hemisphere is to measure the elevation of Polaris above the horizon. In plain English: as you move north, Polaris rises by the same number of degrees as your latitude increases. On a curved Earth, that is exactly what should happen because your local “up” direction tilts as you move over the surface. If Earth were a flat plane, you would not get that clean latitude match over large distances.
BTW, the chances of you sending me $1000 are zero. You also claim you have mathematical evidence which (you haven't posted, mod added)
Removed for rule 1 violations. Argument:
the stars and constellations are different in Australia vs. USA which is impossible if we are all on a flat plane looking up. You claim to have a friend on the east coast and you are in europe, so
Measure Polaris from two latitudes. The simplest way to get astronomic latitude in the Northern Hemisphere is to measure the elevation of Polaris above the horizon. In plain English: as you move north, Polaris rises by the same number of degrees as your latitude increases. On a curved Earth, that is exactly what should happen because your local “up” direction tilts as you move over the surface. If Earth were a flat plane, you would not get that clean latitude match over large distances.
BTW, the chances of you sending me $1000 are zero. You also claim you have mathematical evidence which (you haven't posted, mod added)
Can you please remove the last word? It's a rule 1 violation. Be respectful, attack the argument, not the person.Edit: I misunderstood