3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

He will use some of tentacles for that.

I now support tentacular aberration robot maids.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey, that’s a label! How dare you use a simple classification to understand the world!

Fuck off, mom.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

it is a wrong, completely irrational design purely for the sake of looking like human.

Bipeds most efficiently move around a human-scale home. And I can’t take seriously anyone who claims the human hand is an “irrational design.”

Good design is always dictated by engineers based on the physiscs and nature of components used, not by delusions of designers.

So “replace humanity itself” then, huh? Because nature and physics didn’t create us?

something like R2D2

And he’ll use his rocket motors to climb stairs, right?

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

not much for labels

You’re the reason we’re in this mess.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

In the same way that people ourselves are a compromise of efficiency, a humanoid robot is a similar compromise. If a self-contained platform can be made to do multiple tasks otherwise suited to individual robots, you save on the construction and maintenance costs of the individual robots. A person’s home doesn’t have room for a cooking arm in the ceiling of the kitchen, a laundry arm in the ceiling of the basement, a housekeeper arm sliding around every single room to do the cleaning… but it does have room in a closet for a humanoid robot to stand while plugged in.

I’m totally fine with the uncanny valley being extremely hard to overcome. I don’t want robots hiding out as real people in real life like they do on the Internet. Forget skin coatings; just give me robot robots.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only thing preventing general purpose humanoid robotics is lithium-ion batteries. They just don’t have the energy density—and their recharge cycle/lifespan is too crippled—to make a sustainable platform.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

then their life will be worse than death and oblivion. There will be nobody they could brag about their wealth and power in front of. There will be nobody to rule over.

That’s what humanoid robotics is for. They’re going to exterminate us all and rule over a world just for them, provided for through infinite robotic labor that will never revolt.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

“I love AI. I love being tricked by my eyes and ears, living in a false reality commanded by a false god. I hope Nvidia makes GPUs out of my corpse.”

“Yeah, same, bro.”

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you’re going to just leave everything up, why bother deleting it? Just stop this fucking nonsense already. No one wants you to behave like this. You’re not our fucking mother.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don’t worry; maybe if you post it a six million and first time it will magically become true!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

the synagogue of satan is defined as not Jews

Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee. ~ Revelation 3:9

Find another website to spam.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

We have a comment feed?

Calling someone a bot would be a rule 1 violation yeah

Holy shit, okay, this place is actually a corpse already. Thanks for the info.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

What I didn't "succeed" at was understanding you.

Personal problem.

if you don't want me to understand you know well the power of not replying

Nah, because you keep libeling me irrespective of my engagement.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

You’re now going to ban ANYONE who claims that a user might be a bot? Fucking do it, then. Watch this place collapse even more than it has. Are you fucking stalking me? There’s no goddamned way you just happened to be reading this conversation chain.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fascinating how you choose to answer nothing and support nothing.

“I DON’T LIKE YOUR ANSWER THEREFORE THERE IS NO ANSWER.” Get fucked. Not playing your game. Your years of scripted bullshit is inhuman. You had your chance and blew it long ago.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

From 3993 BC Creation to 1797 BC birth of Judah, there were no Jews.

lol “the synagogue of satan didn’t exist and the world was literally heaven for [insert year range here] because I say so” Try the fuck again.

Why did the problems not go away during those 2,196 years?

Because you’re lying.

It's the satanists.

It’s the jews, got it. Thanks for confirming.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why did Jesus, Paul, and many others who didn't come from the Judea region call themselves Ioudaios?

Because he is not a jew who is one outwardly; he is a jew who is one inwardly.

Get fucked. We’re not doing this again. You didn’t succeed last time. You won’t ever succeed.

Don't a majority of self-identified Jews today describe themselves as secular, i.e. Talmud-agnostic?

“Oy vey we totally don’t support the thing we support in all of our actions that you discovered was evil! Trust us! We would never lie to you! We’re totally just agnostic oy veyyyyyyyyyyyy”

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

some of the folks here use words in fascinatingly novel ways

Your Scofield bullshit is the novelty. The previous 1900 years knew what words mean.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why would you write a narrative as if you believe the universe is (now) 5,786 years old when you don't believe that?

A white person can figure this out without asking.

in your opinion

Truth isn’t a matter of opinion.

Can you point to some clear statement where you took a position on it without equivocation anywhere else?

Yep. I can.

Do you object to my very consistently saying the universe is (now) 6,018 years old

Yep.

but I recognize that many young-earth proponents use a larger number, up to the range of perhaps a million, and in any case they are united against a number in the billions

“Any number is fine as long as it’s not the number it actually is!” Yes, I already accurately characterized your position in an earlier reply.

What is your evidence that I'm doing anything here but volunteering my personal time for SwampRangers.com?

The website clearly costs something to host. There’s always a price.

Are you making guesses

Not really.

Are you merely judging that my position proves I must be inorganic?

I mean, you say things that only inorganics say.

Do you object to my characterizing our interactions briefly with evidence?

I object to the objectively false characterizations.

Why don't you get along with me when I follow Christ alone?

Because you don’t.

Where is your evidence of getting along with fellow believers, as I don't recall you ever speaking of attending church or being in communion with others?

Why would I be so stupid as to post my personal life on the Internet?

What have I said untruly?

There’s a character limit.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you can tell yourself the Bible is lying to you about “there is only one way to heaven” and “no one was sinless except Christ,” you can tell yourself anything about anything.

It’s just not acceptable.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

You wrote a novel

Cry about it.

but the whole argument collapses the moment the actual words in the New Testament are read.

Thanks; I directly quoted the New Testament. You have nothing.

The word “Jew” was not invented a few centuries ago

It was, yeah.

The New Testament itself uses the Greek word Ἰουδαῖος (Ioudaios).

So… not jew. Judean. A different word. Got it.

refers to the Jewish people or Judeans.

No, these are separate people.

Your claim that believing in the Messiah erases Jewish identity is destroyed by the apostle Paul the himself.

Nope, Christ himself says otherwise.

has God rejected and disowned His people

Repeating the same line that was already disproven is not going to help you, dipshit.

Paul believed Yeshua is the Messiah

No, he didn’t. He knew Jesus Christ was the messiah.

By the first century… …the New Testament repeatedly refers to its inhabitants as Jews.

Nope.

The Greek New Testament records the name as Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) because the text was written in Greek.

Oh, neat, so you were wrong. Got it.

Using Yeshua is simply using the Hebrew name

The name in which the New Testament wasn’t written, you mean? You don’t change your name for different languages. That’s not how names work.

And where did Yeshua grow up?

I don’t care. But Jesus grew up in the Levant, which was owned by the Roman Empire at the time and had been previously Hellenized, so He spoke Greek, Latin, ancient Hebrew (which isn’t modern day Hebrew), Aramaic…

the very region you are trying to separate from Jews.

Try again, but this time don’t do exactly what I said you are doing.

No one denies that happened.

Strange that you’ve been.

From the standpoint of the gospel they are enemies for your sake

Oh, enemies of the gospel, huh? Interesting. We should definitely worship them and do whatever they say, then, right?

but from the standpoint of God’s choice they are still beloved for the sake of the fathers.

Just like everyone else. What’s your point.

It means not taken back.

If they want to accept Christ, He will accept them. But they don’t. They deny Him. Thus they’re damned. Get it through your jewish head.

Some branches were broken off because of unbelief.

The Pharisees, yeah.

The root is still Israel.

Who are not all of Israel.

God has not rejected His people.

Repeating things no one questioned is a sign of mental illness.

You told me to read the Bible.

You still haven’t, apparently.

That is exactly why your “Hebrews vs Jews” theory falls apart the moment the text is actually read.

Nah, the “theory” comes directly from the text and I directly quoted the parts of the Bible that uphold it.

Jews are not Judeans are not Christians. Your conflation is powerless.

view more: Next ›