Yep, another spambot posting the same shit.
original song
It’s MTA, though. Nothing wrong with it, of course, but it’s a parody.
Lots of cities passed laws forbidding such measures EVER AGAIN. How would that go?
The laws would be ignored and everyone will be locked down again. It’s not that hard to comprehend.
I have proved it.
I see absolutely nothing linking to anything that proves even the assumptions you have made.
If the glaciers were there suddenly humans populated where did they go?
They melted.
You are clinically insane. You have no rational thought. You don't communicate properly.
Irony.
You rearrange what I said and insert bullshit.
Never happened.
There is nothing on this entire planet worse than somebody like you.
Irony.
You are not an authority.
Irony.
You're cherry picking opposing data.
I directly reported all data from all sources which collect it. You have presented zero data from anyone and are simply repeating hoaxes that you saw on the media.
It isn't factual.
The links are right there.
Factual to the obvious causality.
Anecdotes are not evidence.
Instead you have sat here being the most stupid person anybody could attempt to communicate with.
Irony.
I have linked
Zero links in any of your posts.
But despite it being documented since Egypt, you have ignored. Fertile deltas, desert.
Yep, 15,000 years ago. Zero to do with humans.
You haven't studied anything.
Prove it.
Humans don't cause climate change. A forest fire will tell you otherwise.
- You have no idea what the word ‘climate’ means.
- You have no idea what we are discussing at all.
- Environmentalism ≠ anthropogenic global warming.
I chop down those trees what happens. That climate has immediately changed.
Wrong.
Only somehow you think it will keep being the same temperature
Every single temperature reading from every single source over the last 150 years proves you are wrong, though. Your feelings don’t matter.
Go study something
Every single temperature reading from every single source over the last 150 years proves you are wrong, though. Your feelings don’t matter.
- Literally no.
- Russia should destroy the satellites, yes.
Why can't more assholes change climate.
Because it’s not physically possible.
You're saying the weather is a colonialist trick
I’m saying that you’re clinically insane and posting things that only paid shills have ever said.
There's drought in Alaska
No one cares.
All that Snow and it had a drought?
Yes. It’s called a desert for a reason.
But Alaska had a heatwave.
Cool, and? Do you know how the inverse square law works?
Yet somehow you've pulled a nigger out your ass?
They all look like that.
Seriously, why can't just shit everywhere. It doesn't affect anything.
Find a website that operates in your native language. This relationship isn’t working.
The weather hasn't changed, despite of the heatwave in Alaska.
You dumbass. Look it up.
Did. You still don’t have an argument.
Heatwave in Alaska. Last year or present.
Cool. No one gives a shit. Nothing you are saying proves anything you are claiming in any way, shape, or form.
It happens all the time
It literally does.
I linked Glacier retreat.
You linked literally nothing.
Simple cause and affect.
You have not proven that humans caused this to happen.
You haven't provided the proof.
The links are right there.
Why are you posting hoaxes here.
Either kill yourself or you admit that man isn’t altering the climate. It’s not difficult to comprehend.
I haven't refuted anything.
Correct.
You continue to think my words are false refuting them.
Yep, I did that.
It doesn't take a genius to see you're full of shit.
- Why are you incapable of disproving anything I have said.
- Why does every single statistic from every single organization prove you wrong.
- Why do you have no evidence of your own to post.
Simple cause and affect.
Man didn’t cause a change to climate and isn’t “affecting” it at all.
Probable outcome. Glaciers, permafrost. No why. Honestly why.
Because you’re too stupid to read.
Obviously population settled.
Proven falsehood.
The temperature sooner increased.
Other way around.
Otherwise nigger, the glaciers and permafrost would still be there. Causality.
Yep, they’re not there, which is why people settled.
I am arguing this with the insane.
Irony.
You have something so inherently wrong with your critical thinking.
Irony.
So hugely wrong not to understand simple affect.
Irony.
Did humans change the environment. Of course they did.
Proven falsehood.
There was glaciers now there aren’t
And there weren’t thousands of years ago, too, when there were fewer than a billion people.
By changing the environment has temperature increased.
Wrong.
Is Anchorage a warmer climate than surrounding Alaska.
Maybe.
What affect is it causing.
Nothing.
You stupid clutz.
Thanks for admitting you were wrong.
Now why aren't they admitting it.
They are.
They are.
Literally just said that. Thanks for admitting you were wrong.
But you're still denying it
Because it didn’t happen.
with they fudged the data.
They did.
Because you have proof of what?
AGW doesn’t exist.
You haven't got proof.
The links are right there.
I provided it.
You have no evidence. You have no links. You have no data. You have no proof. Commit suicide immediately.
Those links mean shit.
Thank you for admitting that you have no refutation to the raw data contents of every single organization that records climatological data.
You have cherry picked data
Thank you for admitting that you have no refutation to the raw data contents of every single organization that records climatological data.
and ignored other critical data.
Thank you for admitting that you have no other data to post.
Was siberia farmed 100 years ago. No.
No one lived there and the tools didn’t exist.
What changed.
Technology.
The weather has
Proven falsehood.
Glacier retreat and permafrost melt to the extent of wildfires becoming occurred
Wrong. Wildfires have never been fewer on record than today.
Dumbass if humans hadn't colonised by the millions, would those areas still be cold?
They still are cold. The links prove you wrong.
Go back to nigger school.
Thank you for admitting that you have no refutation to the raw data contents of every single organization that records climatological data.
You link utter crap absurdly.
Thank you for admitting that you have no refutation to the raw data contents of every single organization that records climatological data.
The stuff you've linked is irrelevant.
Thank you for admitting that you have no refutation to the raw data contents of every single organization that records climatological data.
It hasn't accounted for anything.
Thank you for admitting that you have no refutation to the raw data contents of every single organization that records climatological data.
What causes it.
Not man.
Importantly population changing habitats and colonising.
Nope.
Do this on today's scales of billions, where our global population has doubled every 30 years in the last century. You are talking a tipping point
Not for the climate.
The weather, natural change catching up, to the point of immenient extinction, changes affecting the majority.
The weather isn’t changing.
They are already on our natural species, who are in epic decline, animals and plants becoming extinct, and critically endangered, and under threat.
Okay. And?
Until we are with the weather affecting far more of us increasingly in frequency
Every single data point from every single organization says the exact opposite is happening. The links are right there. You are mentally defective and need to be killed now.
Those costs look at them
Not according to any of the data.
add them up in the last 10 years
Lower than ever.
now increase them the next decade.
They’re not increasing.
Come on fucko. You can't be that stupid.
Thank you for admitting that you have no refutation to the raw data contents of every single organization that records climatological data.
Stop being such a retarded nigger.
Thank you for admitting that you have no refutation to the raw data contents of every single organization that records climatological data.
Hey there, bot account. Post something from a website you don’t own or be banned.
Dismissed in two weeks.
Wrong. The links are right there.
election
lol
war
lol
They are the last 100 years there was no agriculture in Alaska or Siberia suddenly there is?
Yeah, people moved up there. That’s what technology does for you.
I mean who did that?
Whites.
It was cold but now humans have like you know populated
And it’s still cold, yeah.
next there's a bunch of crops
Good ol’ white ingenuity.
and the weather has warmed
Nope.
Prior there was permafrost and glaciers.
And still are.
God damn it.
Yeah, sucks that your entire worldview is a lie, doesn’t it.
They weren't.
The link is right there.
gradual perhaps
Like today.
Rapid effects
Aren’t happening.
The last 100 years the more population has expanded.
Yep.
It was 2.5 billion globally. Now it's 8 billion globally.
Yep.
Those towns like Anchorage are now Capitals, next to the glacier, now have all that population, huge population
Yep.
but the glacier has completely retreated
Yep.
A global phenomenon.
Something like that, yeah. Relatively.
You nigger.
WHOOPS THE GLACIERS WERE RETREATING CENTURIES AGO, BEFORE THERE WERE EVEN A BILLION PEOPLE ON EARTH. YOU KNOW FUCKING NOTHING, DIPSHIT.
Thanks for admitting you were wrong.
[no argument]
The links are right there. Everything you believe is a lie. Blow your fucking brains out, paid shill. We’re done here.
They weren't melting prior to humans.
They were.
Last time we all checked
So yesterday?
It has retreated because why, it's really obvious like it isn't cold. It has warmed
It has not.
Oh no, it wasn't because right beside it there are Millions and millions people. Globally billions and billions more people. Hell no.
Nope. It’s cyclical.
You have no argument.
Every single aspect of the AGW narrative is a hoax.
I cannot even establish what your saying.
Learn English, then.
Did the glaciers retreat?
Before humans existed, yes.
Did the land become a desert?
Before humans existed, yes.
What caused it. Humans.
Proven falsehood.
Today we have gained over triple oir entire historical population in under a century.
Yeah, that’s a problem. It has fucking nothing whatsoever to do with the climate.
It has caused massive changes to the weather
Proven falsehood.
You have had no argument.
Every single recorded piece of data from every single source proves you wrong, and it’s all linked right there.
But you'll argue oh look once upon a time ago it had the vegetation on it.
And?
It doesn't matter because the climate had rapidly changed.
No, it hasn’t.
oh no humans, billions more, aren't responsible no, hell no.
Nope. They aren’t.
The mammoths are?
Nope. They aren’t.
In Kenya no snowfall on its peak, what about Ethiopia?
What about it? You have nothing.
[no argument]
Thank you for admitting that every single claim about anthropogenic global warming is false. Discussion over. You have conceded the point. Humans are doing nothing.
[impotent screaming]
Cool.
Land “readings” are diverging from satellite data (which NASA itself says is more accurate and should be the standard instead) because over 40% of land “readings” are estimates made for places without recording equipment. To illustratively do something that the psychopaths love to do, I’ll cherrypick the last 20 years to show that there has been no warming there, despite CO2 continuing to rise. Even using just the satellite record, the world isn’t warming. If we refer back to one of the hottest years in recorded history, we see the difference. Never mind that there have only been ecological benefits to rising CO2.
“Waaaaa! What about the ice caps!”
They’re not melting. They go through cycles. 1974 had less ice than today. Oh, and don’t listen to what scientists say, whatever you do. Nowhere is melting out of turn, not even Greenland (where it has been growing for something like 30 years). Oh, and the ice cores themselves? They show that the past was hotter.
“But the sea level is rising!”
It has been rising for 13,000 years. In that time, it has never risen more slowly than right now. Were our ancestors belching out CO2 faster than we were? Maybe they were farting a lot more. It’s rising more slowly than at any time in that history, and it’s also rising more slowly than any claim made public by any outlet. Here’s the source data for that chart. It’s an FTP link, so it should automatically download the raw file (which you don’t need to worry about, as it’s a bunch of undifferentiated numbers). Turns out that NOAA marks the average as 0.63 mm per year. Not 3.3. Not 2.8. Certainly not a foot per year, which is needed for the most modern public “predictions” about this bullshit.
“But ocean acidity!”
Guess what? It’s also cyclical.
“Okay, not ice caps, but what about the glaciers?”
They’ve been melting since at least the 1780s when we started measuring them. I also have information for the Alps and other areas. Was our pre-industrial civilization responsible for “greenhouse gases” too? There were no glaciers in Europe in the Middle Ages. That’s called the Medieval Warm Period, something your “scientists” have been trying to erase from the record for decades (ironically, since, 1984) because it goes against their narrative. Gee, we must have had even more factories then than we do now… right?
“But but but but but but but but muh consensus! They agree! Because I say they do! That makes what they say true!”
Sorry, there never was any consensus.
“Then why don’t climate change deniers publish papers?”
Because they do (and because papers often aren’t published because the publishing groups are owned by AGW liars).
”So what the hell is this all about?”
The purposeful destruction of the economy and infrastructure of the Western world and only the Western world.
None of the data supports the existence of AGW.
“WAA! IT’S ONLY UNITED STATES TEMPERATURES!”
Because there is no other record of meaningful scientific value anywhere. Only the United States (and parts of Japan) has a temperature record that has been around long enough for climatological statements can be based on it. The GHCND set of stations has slowly been closed down… and what’s this! The stations being closed down ARE FAR FROM THE EQUATOR. What does that mean? The average latitude of GHCND stations IS FIFTEEN FUCKING DEGREES CLOSER TO THE EQUATOR than it used to be. Do you imagine that might raise temperatures? If you answer no, don’t bother answering in the first place.
The United States has a network of 1200+ USHCN stations with data going back to 1895 and earlier. The raw USHCN temperature record shows that there has been a slight cooling since 1920 (see above). USHCN is a subset of GHCND (Global Historical Climatology Network Daily.) Cooling doesn’t suit the needs of your masters, so they cherrypicked a small subset of GHCND stations (which show a large amount of warming since 1920) for use in the global GSN temperature record.
So let’s stop this madness, right? What happens when we take data from SCIENTIFICALLY SOUND SOURCES? That is, 1. stations active for a long time and 2. stations that don’t move (meaning keeping the same latitude). We see what I said above. NO. WARMING.
At the very best (for your delusions), you (meaning your own authorities) can say that there has been zero change since modern recordings began. Your bastard king himself, James Hansen, ADMITTED TO THIS.
"WAAAAAA THE DOCUMENT ENDS IN 1995!"
And yet there has been zero warming SINCE THEN, too, so you don’t have a leg to stand on.
Funny how sea level is identical to 1870 and 1901, huh? (La Jolla and La Jolla; Sydney and Sydney, respectively)? Funny how all the gauges show a 0.63mm/yr rise (which, again, is smaller than at any time in the last 11,000 years). Not 3.3. Not 2.6. Not 1.4. Certainly not “a meter by 2050.”
“But weather is becoming more extreme!”
Nah, less. Universally. What’s more, do you imagine? Not fires. Ha! Not floods.
USGS research has shown no linkage between flooding (either increases or decreases) and the increase in greenhouse gases. Essentially, from USGS long-term streamgage data for sites across the country with no regulation or other changes to the watershed that could influence the streamflow, the data shows no systematic increases in flooding through time.
Not tornadoes. Five (nearly six now) consecutive years of below average events. Not hurricanes. Every single indicator shows they’re not only becoming less frequent, but also less powerful. Not even drought. Hilarious! So what is it? What’s worse? Tell us. Is it anything at all? Anywhere? At any time? No. Of course, this has been known for a while. It’s global cooling’s fault, after all! Oh, wait… NOAA wouldn’t want you to hear this now, would they?
Your narrative is predicated on laziness. Your narrative is predicated on people not doing their homework and not comprehending the data they see. Your narrative is predicated on appeals to authority and the expectation that your masters will never lie to you. That’s the only way it has ever existed.
Imagine trusting anything a politician says.
Proven falsehood.
Nope. There has been no temperature change in that timeframe. The links already proved you wrong. You are clinically insane and paid to post lies.
Yep.
It wasn’t a desert back then.
Because you can’t control the Sun, you brain damaged lunatic.
Wrong.
Didn’t happen.
Thanks for admitting that it wasn’t humanity’s doing.
You’re legitimately mentally ill.
Yep, the Sun.
The links are right there.
They’re lying. No data shows this. Get psychiatric help immediately.