-3
TallestSkil -3 points ago +1 / -4

“It’s okay that I will never actually own anything, because it’s cheaper than otherwise not owning anything!”

Guess you’re happy.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not really.

That you can’t maintain conversational context for even a single post. Even AI Dungeon does better than that.

Perhaps, but i think i’ve just given it more thought than you.

Nah.

Ideas most often do not spring from evidence

No one said otherwise.

nor is evidence required to support them

If you expect anyone to take you seriously or believe you, they do.

Ideas can be and often are compelling in and of themselves.

Nope. The compelling part is when they’re truthful. Truth is innate to being.

Lol. This is not a debate.

Thanks for admitting your ideas are false.

Currently it barely qualifies as a conversation

Yes, that’d be because I’m only mocking you and not pretending otherwise. Your physical inability to stay on topic or prove your claims has LONG been proven. This is just to keep you away from sane people.

your pigheaded adversarial demeanor

Truth is like that, yeah. It doesn’t waver in the face of autistic retards who think that subjectivism exists. I try to reflect truth.

As i said, your belief/assumption that everything you have said is correct is stupid

Good thing I have no such belief or assumption, isn’t it? Burn in hell, you fucking retard. If anything I said was wrong, you would have proven it long ago. But you believe proof doesn’t exist conceptually. You can’t do it.

Pride is a fools fortress and shame’s cloak. Cast it aside if you can.

Cool, no pride here. Project somewhere else, fuckstick.

Then how is it i can and do?

You don’t. Enjoy your mockery.

This is another demonstration of your disagreeing civilly?

No, you’re not human, so you deserve no civility. How many times does this need said?

Lol. You “get” to disagree with anything.

Enjoy your mockery.

You can and should disagree with “truth” when that “truth” is false.

Then it’s not truth. Words have definitions. I refuse to play your saussurean games, relativist.

Why can’t a person just be f*ing wrong anymore?

You are wrong. I am explaining why you are wrong. You are reacting as a shill does in the face of this.

Why is everyone automatically a liar?

Why do you beat your wife? (Honestly, do you trust anything some retard on the Internet says, sight unseen?)

And how is being uncivil to those who could help you in your struggle

You’ve already admitted you don’t believe truth exists. You’re on the other side of the struggle.

If you commit yourself to acting in such a way, you are preventing collaboration.

Yep, I don’t give a shit about collaborating with people who want me exterminated. “You have to let gays and nonwhites and atheists into your movement because they’re totally on your side!” Fuck your civnat bullshit.

Divide and conquer is a simple game and a fundamental tactic of our common enemy.

My common enemy is subjectivity. Everything stems from subjectivism.

Perhaps you should stop helping them?

Perhaps you should stop being a subjectivist.

You can of course demand anything you wish, but you are not entitled to receive anything.

You can demand your ideas be entertained without proof, but you are not entitled to anything but mockery.

You will catch more flies with honey

No, actually, and you’ll catch even more with a pile of shit, but that doesn’t matter to me because I deal in truth.

and demanding/screaming at them will always tend to drive them away.

Good.

many of those people in those groups are not willing participants. They need help

And they cannot–and will not–get it until “a military boot crashes into his fat bottom.” Words can’t fix them. They are beyond words.

Making petulant demands

lol, truth is not petulance.

You can dismiss anything you want. But don’t be surprised when your close minded and needlessly adversarial approach prevents you from learning new things and effectively communicating.

Cool. Hasn’t so far. Has prevented me from falling for lies, though.

You haven’t thought this through

Have. Indeed, had to dumb it down to elementary level comprehension.

Proof is not something you can give another (outside of mathematics).

lol, you’re mentally ill.

It is too subjective.

“Truth is subjective,” yes, you’re mentally ill. Just like I said before. You’re beyond salvation.

No speculation, no thought

NOT WHEN THE TOPIC IS NOT A MATTER OF OPINION, YOU FUCKING RELATIVIST.

Citation please. Provide proof.

Right. Like that. It’s not that hard to demand it of others.

Am i getting through to you at all?

No, I don’t engage with proven psychopaths except to mock them and waste their time. You’re a relativist. You’re beyond saving.

You seem caught in a loop

Congrats, you noticed that I’m purposely dragging you into a loop to further mock your inability to comprehend objectivity as a concept. We’ll go around again if you like.

and are advocating for a common troll/shill tactic.

Yeah, trolls and shills always want to know the truth. They always demand evidence for claims. That’s definitely how they behave.

They are self defeating and closed minded to me

Enjoy your genocide, then. I’m not compromising with objective, metaphysical evil.

you are both taking it too far

Truth is the wall. There is nothing beyond.

and being uncivil

My people are being exterminated from the face of the Earth. I don’t give a single flying fuck about hurting the feelings of a paid shill on a meaningless Internet website. I want you to kill yourself, in real life, for no other reason than thinking that I should give a shit what some genocidal communist whore thinks about me. Censor yourself, then, you fucking milquetoast.

as well as adversarial

Good. It’s called an immune response. I don’t want my white blood cells to welcome the cancer in and show it where all the good organs are.

which only prevents communication and collaboration.

I’m not collaborating with relativists. Ever.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

OY VEY I’M NORMAL

SPACE NO REAL

EARTH NO ROUND

MOON NO EXIST

YOU A JEW NOT MEEEEEEEEE

Burn in hell.

OY VEY I REFUSE TO STAY ON THE TOPIC OF MY OWN THREAD THEREFORE YOU’RE A SHILL

Literally kill yourself.

how is that not

Read a fucking book on history.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

You dont demand anything

Cry.

you are just here for one purpose

Truth.

to influence

people to post the truth.

and you suck at it

No, I’ve exposed subhuman paid shills like yourself time and again.

Stick your dick in a toaster

Thank you for admitting the Earth is not flat.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

on topic

on the narrative

God in heaven, you’re shit at your job. Holy fucking shit, you autistic piece of trash. Does this work on other websites? Answer the goddamn question. I’m really curious. Does your behavior actually fucking work in other places? Because it doesn’t work here. We’re literate here.

liberal

fascist

You really know fuck all about everything, don’t you.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

What are you talking about?

Amazing.

Ideas can stand on their own without evidence.

Literally no. Congratulations on admitting you’re insane.

And ideas that are supported by evidence are often wrong/worthless.

Wrong.

Evidence is easy.

No.

You misunderstand.

No.

It is you who should have the examples, not me.

Thank you for admitting that everything you said is a lie. Presented without evidence = dismissed without evidence. They’re your claims. You have to prove them or they’re going to be ignored.

It is purely your foolish vanity that prevents it.

Said the psychopath who refuses to prove his own claims.

Deludedly believing you are always right is stupid and vain/proud.

Good thing no one here is doing that, right? Fuck off, illiterate.

Cool it there freud. I thought you were against the “communists” and their nonsense...

“You’re a communist because you called out my behavior in which communists engage!”

Goddamn, you’re shit at your job.

Then act like it.

I do. Get the fuck over it, you retarded sack of communist shit. You still cannot reply to the topic of discussion and abjectly refuse to do so. You’re a psychopathic paid shill and a moral relativist. You have nothing but your emotions. Burn in hell.

I disagree.

You don’t get to disagree. It’s not a matter of agreement. You have no voice in the matter.

Not without vapid insult and calls to suicide you can’t :(

Can. Already explained. You didn’t read. Get fucked.

your major difficulty is in disagreeing civilly

  1. Truth isn’t a matter of agreement.
  2. You don’t get to disagree with truth.
  3. My people are being exterminated from the face of the Earth, so you deserve no civility when you post lies.

I understand why you think this, but it’s wrong. We can request such proof/evidence, and arbitrate that any refusal to provide such is a reason to discard/ignore/prevent consideration

Right, so… demand. Words have definitions.

but making petulant demands is for children.

Cool, we’re demanding you post evidence or that you kill yourself. Get over it, you fucking child. You don’t get to endlessly post lies and claim that your fee fees told you it’s okay because it’s true because you said so.

All claims, including facts which are merely one type of claim, regardless of source are our responsibility to verify thoroughly before accepting.

No shit.

We can ask for help in this, but we can’t demand nor expect it.

Then don’t “demand” or “expect” your lies to

  1. go unquestioned
  2. remain up
  3. result in you NOT being told to commit suicide for being a communist, a paid shill, and a moral relativist, since there is no possibility of discussion with a member of these groups, a priori

Furthermore, it is a process and skillset that we refine by doing ourselves.

And I’m somehow not doing it myself by continuing to bog you, a communist paid shill moral relativist, down in self-incrimination?

In a formal debate the burden of proof falls on the claimant

Thanks for admitting you have no proof of your claims and they are dismissed.

In real life, it falls on us.

Thanks for admitting that you have no proof and that your claims are dismissed.

It’s really.

Really.

Simple to comprehend.

You say thing, you prove thing. If you no can prove, you no say. If other say thing with no proof, demand other proof. If no proof come, dismiss other thing.

If these standards are too stringent for you, find somewhere else to spam your lies. Like reddit. They love what you say there.

by DrLeaks
0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

And unlike the United States, a second or third world nation might actually ban Twitter in response to this and forbid any Western social media from being accessed.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

Thank you, yes. Of course your denial will mean more proof to him.

by DrLeaks
-2
TallestSkil -2 points ago +1 / -3

But it won’t be. So who cares.

by DrLeaks
1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

It will be dismissed.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

Enjoy property taxes forever.

-4
TallestSkil -4 points ago +1 / -5

life isn’t worth living

You can just stop the sentence there, honestly.

-2
TallestSkil -2 points ago +1 / -3

at what point

Literally constantly; be buying silver/gold with any spare cash you have.

-2
TallestSkil -2 points ago +1 / -3

Neat, keep proving me right.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

What’s funny is that you still can’t prove a goddamn thing you say, either when I quote it directly or mock you by quoting it directly anyway.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

NO U

Great argument.

I don’t hide

Great. Why are you talking about things no one here does? Are you physically capable of disproving anything I say?

My thoughts can stand by their own merits

Not when they have no evidence, they can’t.

and I merely avoid trolls like you - not run away.

Translation: “I am so afraid of you that I refuse to reply to you because I’m terrified that you will prove me wrong, so if I don’t mention you in any way I can get away with lying about you and you won’t notice.”

What would be the point?

Thanks for admitting that nothing you have ever said has been correct.

You'd just ignore it

  1. No one cares about me. I don’t matter. You’re so fucking narcissistic that you can’t comprehend that no one else is as vapid as you are.
  2. It’s not about me, you autistic piece of shit. It’s about truth itself, for the sake of everyone else, and having a *cited and sourced record of objective reality. If you don’t care about that, get the fuck off this website. We’re not here to post lies or opinions or fantasies. We’re here to uncover genuine conspiracies with real proof.

to feel better about yourself. Your behavior is both shameful and sad.

Project somewhere sense; it’s not working on me.

Why would you seriously consider

  1. No one cares about me. I don’t matter. You’re so fucking narcissistic that you can’t comprehend that no one else is as vapid as you are.
  2. It’s not about me or what I consider. You’re so much of a brain dead communist that you think everyone engages in relativism like you do. Unlike you, I am capable of entertaining an idea that I do not personally like, never mind an idea which is objectively false.

Especially if it contradicted your infallible ego.

  1. I have no ego. I’m worthless. I don’t matter. You’re so fucking narcissistic that you can’t comprehend that no one else is as vapid as you are.
  2. You have absolutely nothing to back up any of your claims, which is why you continue to attack me personally instead of simply humiliating me (boy, wouldn’t I look silly since I have such a big ego) by actually posting cited and sourced proof of your claims. Whoops.

Of course you have said things that are wrong.

Name one, you subhuman coward.

To assume otherwise is incredibly proud, stupid, and foolish.

Neat. So you have no examples?

there are two things

Holy shit, I agree completely. You’re absolutely right on both counts, which is why I have trouble with your complaints regarding point two. Demanding proof/evidence is our website’s immune system. How we deal with genuine shills is by demanding proof/evidence of the claims they make. When they refuse to provide proof/evidence, that’s it. We’ve caught them. After that, there’s no discussion except that of our own, because the proof-refuser has nothing more of any value to add to us. We can’t just let it slide. We can entertain the ideas presented by the shill, perhaps simply because we’d be interested in seeing where those ideas take us (to learn what they’re going to attack us with next), but we cannot simply allow ourselves to accept claims or statements when the faggot who posted them has no evidence for them. Ever. Zero tolerance. Otherwise we no longer stand for truth and can no longer parse genuine conspiracies from hoaxes (malicious or benevolent).

The OP did

Okay, yes, my mistake in the sentence. I should have said, “No one actually said a thing you claimed.” The ambiguity was in “claim of statement” vs. “actual statement.” My fault.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

he’s wrong about the words he uses and wrong about the things you do

but it’s totally valid, gnome sane

No.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

You’re here and replying. You’ve proven it yourself. Scream some more about how everything I say keeps being right. It’s not going to change anything.

-2
TallestSkil -2 points ago +1 / -3

Thanks for refusing to answer any of the questions that you were actually asked, refusing to explain any of your views of history in any capacity, refusing to cite your claims, refusing to provide evidence for them, and refusing to disprove—with citations—anything I countered previously.

Thanks for refusing to answer any of the second set of questions that you were asked, refusing to explain any of your views with citations or sources, and refusing to disprove of my statements, old or new, with citations our sources.

Burn in hell, shill. We’re not falling for your narrative.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

Thanks for refusing to answer any of the questions that you were actually asked, refusing to explain any of your views of history in any capacity, refusing to cite your claims, refusing to provide evidence for them, and refusing to disprove—with citations—anything I countered previously.

Thanks for refusing to answer any of the second set of questions that you were asked, refusing to explain any of your views with citations or sources, and refusing to disprove of my statements, old or new, with citations our sources.

Burn in hell, shill. We’re not falling for your narrative.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

you’re a liberal because you demand proof of others’ claims rather than simply attacking your opponent with no evidence

Enjoy your mockery.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

We now have hard proof of DNC officials saying the constitution is meaningless and no one will ever be punished for this.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›