▲ 6 ▼
TallestSkil 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don’t care about this for its own sake. The government hasn’t changed hands, no one lost power, no one gained power, and white genocide continues unabated in every form–physical, psychological, economic, social, structural, environmental, etc. None of these people are real. They’re not on my side. They don’t care about truth.

I care because I want this to result in seventy million communists committing suicide by injecting themselves with newly ‘illegal’ and unsafe drugs obtained through surreptitious means and then collapsing into helplessness as their society collapses around them from everyone else doing the same.

And above their graves, the future will belong to us.

▲ 5 ▼
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good, do it. We need less efficient government that can’t effectively surveil our lives and that launches nukes at Israel because it was tricked into pretending to be my grandmother.

▲ 5 ▼
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

Utter nonsense. Tariffs are what were destroyed to make way for globalism. It’s the last thing the ZOG wants, which why…

There is no tariff war.

…this is true. It’s all just a hoax. Tariffs are objectively good.

▲ 2 ▼
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Has it though. Has it really?

Yep.

The funny thing is I think most religion is a hoax.

tips trilby

Like mankind's oldest pyramid / ponzi scheme

The only pyramids I care about are the ones that began being built ~12,500 years ago.

▲ 4 ▼
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

UFOs are a hoax and always have been. Stop falling for well poisoning.

▲ 2 ▼
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ooh, is it a bot? It just admitted it’s paid, but is it actually a bot. It hasn’t ever posted anything outside of what an LLM could say. It even looks trained on the line “insult everyone you reply to,” given that all of its posts just contain insults and no actual content.

Let’s see if a M å ř ķ œ v chain (hiding the name of the term in case it’s blacklisted) can trip it up. My prediction? It defaults to an uncategorized personal attack (based on an ELSE statement in its training) because it won’t understand it.

Results of the terms introduced here are distant enough there may. Outbreeding can be disastrous for the parents occupy meet at those. Disastrous for the terms introduced here are found then what happens. Descendants of organisms are made with little mixed borders the mixed. Such pairings are distant enough there may lack the descendants may. Pairings many mismatches to understand if there is not rare in. Many of organisms are found then what happens when the results. Offspring become separate species most of organisms are distant enough there. Will lack the parent group the time especially when the borders. Lack the two groups of such pairings are distant enough there. Interactions of such pairings are important to express many mismatches to. Genes from many mismatches to ever come together in a list. That should normally result in significant numbers in nature when the. Should normally result in the parents phenotypes thus lacking specialized characteristics. Normally result in either parent populations resulting in either parent group.

▲ 2 ▼
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

[strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman]

Reply, paid shill.

Gay by dukey
▲ 3 ▼
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

boxes are for cereal, not for people

Gotcha. We’ll just cremate your corpses, then, rather than bury them. That way no one will ever know you existed.

boxes are not for gender

ALSO DRAW YOUR GENDER DIRECTLY ON THE BOX, YOU FILTHY GOYIM

Good job.

▲ 1 ▼
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

YOU’RE projecting because you called me out for projecting my own failures onto YOU! You can’t do that, only I can do that! Therefore YOU’RE doing it!

It’s always interesting to see how mentally defective communists can be.

▲ 1 ▼
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look up "the switch in time that saved nine" on the prototypical case of a court that got in the way of an executive branch with a mandate.

You’re telling me what I talked about in… I guess it was another thread. The court did what they were told by their owners, lest they be destroyed. Just like the president does what he’s told by his owners, lest he be destroyed. Just like Congress does what it’s told by its owners, lest it be destroyed. This isn’t relevant to the discussion.

As for Federalist 78, and saying you don't care what it says

Reported for spam. No one said this but you.

dismissing data that you can't incorporate into your limited model.

You mean what you did when

DONALD TRUMP PUBLICLY ADMITTED THAT YOU ARE LYING AND THAT HE IS PURPOSELY ALLOWING COURTS TO TELL HIM WHAT HE CAN AND CANNOT DO, IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION?

What about it? What about you projecting your own failures onto me?

I'm wasting my time

No, please, continue humiliating yourself. It’s not like you’ll stop until your paychecks bounce.

forum slide

Dipshit paid shill doesn’t even know how the website works, lol.

I give you the last word here.

Thanks for admitting that

DONALD TRUMP PUBLICLY ADMITTED THAT YOU ARE LYING AND THAT HE IS PURPOSELY ALLOWING COURTS TO TELL HIM WHAT HE CAN AND CANNOT DO, IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.

▲ 1 ▼
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

When has a court ever prevented anything a determined legislature and executive has ever pushed forward?

Any time said executive or legislature does something jews don’t want. Like when that Californian judge said voters don’t get to vote on whether illegals can be here and decided that their vote was null and void, allowing illegals to be here.

Read Federalist 78

WOW A PIECE OF PAPER! THAT’S SURELY GOING TO STOP A JEW!

▲ 1 ▼
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

I pointed out that the OP caught you in a logic trap

You didn’t, though.

I wrote "got you there TS”.

Yep, because you don’t understand what’s being discussed.

Why do you insist on holding some sort of grudge from another thread?

The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you. You failed. Just stop replying, coward.

▲ 1 ▼
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s not, no. It’s an example of you having absolutely nothing whatsoever to refute what I have posted, and so your “NUH UH” claims to the contrary are simply ignored. You don’t have to do anything. You simply won’t be taken seriously as a human being if you don’t. “You’re wrong because I say so” isn’t an argument.

Literally trying to help you. You don’t have to take the help. You can continue to be objectively wrong and die screaming due to your retardation. I don’t really care.

▲ 1 ▼
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

a federal judge has ruled

Irrelevant. The Constitution explicitly says the president has this power, and every president up to Nixon used it. Judges don’t magically grant or withhold powers. They have no power to do so. We’re not discussing what judges do or don’t do. We’re discussing what Trump does or doesn’t do.

And Trump has chosen not to do what he is legally allowed to do simply because a judge illegally said so.

Eat shit.

▲ 1 ▼
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

WAAAAAAA MOMMY THE BAD MAN PROVED WRONG EVERYTHING I SAID, THEREFORE NONE OF IT IS WRONG BECAUSE BUZZWORDS!

Thanks for admitting that

  1. you are physically incapable of defending your claims with citations or sources in any form
  2. everything I said is true
▲ 2 ▼
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why would you post about one thread’s topic in another? The point of threads is to end confusion. Are you genuinely this mentally ill?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›