Yes, him too. This is obvious heresy. Also bold-faced ecumenism towards a one-world religion like the Abu Dabi inter-faith center. As if the Christian Trinitarian God is the same as the demons jews and muslims worship. There's no such thing as commonality between "Abrahamic religions". This is in the same category as "judeo-christian values".
They did good not to give it to them. The printing press gave rise to the whole "it's me and muh Bible" protestant movement going completely wild with interpretation of the liturgical text, leading to what we have today - megachurches, cult leaders and lgbt churches with gay/female pastors.
Go get your booster you goddamn sonofabitch soulless shill.
I see the roman calendar also has 354 days. They count the years since the establishment of Rome. Here's what I got.
You mean the Julian calendar?
Make what too obvious? You just said it was nothing but a PR stunt.
That it's a PR stunt and the constitution is in fact void. That's why the legalistic ritual is followed as if those decisions aren't already made by a group of people who are not to be seen in mainstream politics.
Makes it all the more hilarious they chose Trump for the gig. The guy is a first class bs artist and a reality tv star. But normies have been brought up in that paradigm and never questioned its foundations. Their whole lives are reality tv, everything they know is fake. They won't recognize truth even if it hit them in the face because their hearts have grown cold, calculating and apathetic. They are too worldly and the world is upside-down clown world. As Neil Postman put it "we're amusing ourselves to death".
Because it's a PR game. If they make it too obvious people may rise up and Americans own guns unlike the cucked Europeans, Canadians and Aussies.
You're missing the fact this country ceased to be a democratic republic in 1913 when the Fed took over. All the constitution and government talk is a formality. Your rights can be suspended at any given time for "national security" reasons and the coof proved that's the case.
That's true. I don't know it, I just speculate.
That's free-dance interpretation of scripture. The vaccines are not the mark of the beast, but they are a step in that direction. The mark of the beast will be on the right hand or the forehead and those who don't have it won't be able to buy or sell. The mark is a literal mark like a barcode (or subcutaneous chip), identifying each person and professing his allegiance to the Beast.
No, the Temple he built was destroyed in 70AD as Christ has prophesized.
And yet the virtue signaling, appeals to both personal liberty and conformist collectivism and feminized appeal to emotion propaganda have never been stronger. Everything is treated like a product to be consoomed. The reason our technocratic overlords prefer such a society is because it's easier to be controlled, remodeled and enslaved. They are fully pragmatic in their believes and only support the ideas that are useful to their agenda.
Based and truthpilled. We live in a cowardly society which is apathetic to the truth.
Capitalism is an economic system. Maybe it implies some ethics but it still needs a more pronounced ideology to supplement it as a worldview. Like socialism (China) or liberal democracy (the West). Both of those are in reality a technocratic rule by a financial and corporate elite but I'm talking about how the government presents itself to the public.
You know they don't allow DNA testing in Israel? It's because the people claiming to be hebrew are not actually hebrew, they are using Judaism as armor.
Wait, who's doing the testing? It's either the government or the ancestry.com platforms which are owned by jews too. What prevents them from falsifying the results?
No one is capable of predicting the full implications of technology like the internet but it was mostly a tool for globalization like the global free market before it. Generally, normies are preprogrammed to conceive of all new technology as good because it's convenient, amusing or just because "muh technological/ scientific progress". It's a religion. Of course the reality is we shouldn't idolize technology as an end in itself but should only use it as a tool for solving certain problems and be careful if it does more harm than good. But that gets into ethics and today's societies don't have a coherent view on that and people's opinions are being manipulated through propaganda.
Most of the time what we get are competing narratives and all of them are misinformation. First one needs a standard for true information and a worldview that can ground it.
As all technology it is a double-bladed sword. They developed ARPANET to establish control, surveillance and to globalize the world but it also has positives for the people like unprecedented access to information.
The only sane position towards any politician is simple: I like them when they do good stuff and I don't like them when they do bad stuff. I'd extend no allegiance whatsoever though because all of them are compromised to some extent, otherwise they wouldn't hold a position like that.
I'm not sure who you're replaying to. I don't have a party but I'm definitely not a maga Qtard. If I have to choose I'd still pick Trump over the demonic libtards but I'm not going to act as if he's fighting the good fight and he's going to drain the swamp (which he's a part of). He has so much circumcised cocks up his ass that he can't sit right any more.
Let's see - he's a billionaire zionist jew lover whose real estate business is completely dependent on jewish financing and he's still pushing the clot shots like hot pudding. He's definitely on our side, guys!
You're one of the worst sophists I've argued with here. It's like I'm talking to a wall. I don't trust one over the other, I didn't know about this Justin guy prior to his documentary. He makes a good case against James, that's all. But since you don't care I can't force feed you the evidence he's got. Believe whatever you want, I'm done arguing.
That's lazy. Are you buddies with James? How many times have you met him? I'm not in a position to consider any one of them as being more trustworthy and neither are you. I'm just looking at the evidence. It's demonstrable Justin worked for James and they were pretty close. In fact, he's the honeytrap that got the Pfizer idiot to open up on their tinder date (identified through his voice and through his reflection in a mirror on the recording). If Justin made up all this crap (including falsifying the phone talks he had with him) James could have easily disproven him and taken him to court for defamation.
You:
I don't have a fucking clue what I'm talking about because I don't want to hear the other side of the story.
Again, if you made the effort to inform yourself, you'd know PV have plausible deniability. They don't have to release the records themselves because Justin would have leaked them and be liable for them. They just have to give him back what's rightfully his but he naively entrusted to them. James lied to him the story would get released initially but got cold feet (someone probably contacted him) and started delaying. In 2023 he told Justin "it was a good story but it's been 2 years so it's not relevant anymore, so we won't be releasing it".
But even if PV and James were liable what does that mean for their whole fucking operation? That they can expose corruption but up to a certain point where the stakes are low? As I said they'd never release a real hard hitter. They got famous because of the gay Pfizer grunt and they milked that story dry but to what end? What did it achieve except preaching to the choir that Pfizer is a corrupt big pharma company? I know it was bullshit because of the lack of consequences. There's a bit of a rumble but it's always contained. This is not even the tip of the iceberg and they act as if they are heroes. No, the real heroes are whistleblowers who get hunted like dogs, prosecuted or straight on suicided for the crimes they expose.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UZU51vVIBUjo/