Ironically the jews are right here - the only way to have sex is the natural intercourse between a man and a woman. Any other perversion like sodomy doesn't qualify as sex as it can't lead to reproduction. This is the Christian position also.
Come on, this is pedantry. Out of 10 Riesenbergs, 8 will have jewish ancestry. It's not 100% proof but the origin of the name is ashkenazi and it's a good bet. The name is jewish. Beck is not a specifically jewish name. Don't go reddit on me, son.
Wait - jews, muslims, satanists and atheists don't? What a clown.
Literally zero knowledge of what you're talking about. This is schizo level nonsense.
Riesenberg is an ashkenazi surname. You could be jewish and convert to Christianity. You make no sense.
On the contrary. More young people are coming to the true Church. The only white demographic in the west that's above replacement are Christians. Cope harder lefty.
Do you want to get schooled on the subject or do you prefer to remain in delusion believing such low-tier ahistorical reddit arguments?
Btw, the Orthodox Catholic Church (the true Church before the schism) which you call idol worshippers, gave you the Bible canon. Yes, the list of books that go in the Bible that you hold and read was compiled by the Early Church at the councils, it didn't magically grow on a tree. But "muh Sola Scriptura!"
Here's a short video about icon veneration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMp5JJCp0Cs
All you think about is money. Sad slave mentality to go with meaningless existence. But on the up side it will die off with you because you won't reproduce.
He's talking about the Haavara agreement of 1933. Up until the war this was the official policy of the Reich.
You are the best IDF could spare?
The problem is metaphysical. A socially constructed system like law can't help you universalize subjective preferences that are still grounded in the individual human mind. It's just appealing to majority.
Because they are NOT human beings but disgusting animals! STOP DEFENDING HOMOSEXUALS!
That's not Christian. Those who engage in sodomy are made in the image of God and this is precisely why it's problematic. If they were mere beasts, God wouldn't care or judge them. Homosexuality is a grave sin but no one should define themselves by the sin they indulge in. Everyone is called to repent and renounce sin and be sanctified through Christ.
Not all of them are jews. There are lots of shabbos goyim.
Evil is subject to good because evil has no independent existence. It is not a force in itself, but a distortion of what is good—a privation, absence, or misdirection of the good.
Yes, this is the Christian worldview. I'd only add that God is the ultimate good because the good having a universal existence can't be grounded in the subjective and finite mind of man.
At least you don't have to worry about that. You need to have sex with a woman in order to have children.
How do you mean? Let's hear the argument.
That's the plan. Coudenhov-Kalergi, the jewish mastermind behind the EU, envisioned that racial intermixing due to spread of migration and globalism will lead to a single future mongrel race of Eurasian-Negroid type.
“The man of the far future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.”
- from his Practical idealism
Shame. No real men left so women have to speak up instead. The 100 year old fabian plan is a success in UK and Europe. Next phase is the USA and they're already have the lib states under their thumb.
My point was that rights is a legal term and don't have ontological existence (aren't found in reality). They are social constructs that are based on a bunch of beliefs people hold to be true with no justification. Which ironically is what idiot atheists accuse Christians of doing. Rights are their "sky daddy" basically.
The purpose was to showcase we all have believes based on faith, regardless of being secular or religious. What's important is how are those believes justified and I'm arguing that atheists can't justify any of it in their worldview.
Nobody should have their healthcare taken away...
There shouldn't be special payoffs for people who have kids.
Ok, let's go the pragmatic route: Do you need people for a functioning society? Who's going to provide you with healthcare and services? Maybe there's a reason behind state incentives for people having children?
Anti-natalism is self refuting. it is plain retarded.
That's a tu quoque. I grant you that Christianity is false - how does that help your case?
You believe in fairy tales, dude. A bunch of wigged men with leggings got together and crafted your holy book of rights that they pulled out of thin air. Why do we even have rights if we're a product of a blind deterministic meaningless process of atoms bumping into each other in a vast chaotic universe? Where do you get value from?
Well, if they were defined and written down by a bunch of people, they must be real and objectively true then. Unlike God of the Bible which was also written by a bunch of people who defined Him. Case closed.
Any involvement of the government in personal choices is an infringement of basic human rights.
Oh wait, you believe in rights? Where are they? Can I touch and smell them? Do they exist or are they made up like sky daddy is?
But wait, I thought we're not supposed to hold unjustified beliefs? I asked you to give a justification for your belief things should be the way you say and I get "I explained the premise with examples" which is begging the question and ad homs about sky daddy?
Aren't you supposed to be the reasonable one here who deals with logic and facts and not unfounded beliefs?
There's not a single account more sus than you bud. You glow like St Elmo's fire on a clear night at sea.