Execution of gay people in Iran
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
But wait, I thought we're not supposed to hold unjustified beliefs? I asked you to give a justification for your belief things should be the way you say and I get "I explained the premise with examples" which is begging the question and ad homs about sky daddy?
Aren't you supposed to be the reasonable one here who deals with logic and facts and not unfounded beliefs?
I am dealing with facts. It's a very simple premise - the government has no right to enforce or criticize people's lifestyle choices.
Any involvement of the government in personal choices is an infringement of basic human rights.
Therefore I get to kill you!
My lifestyle, my choice :)
Oh wait, you believe in rights? Where are they? Can I touch and smell them? Do they exist or are they made up like sky daddy is?
Downvoted because of no right to make such a comment.
My point was that rights is a legal term and don't have ontological existence (aren't found in reality). They are social constructs that are based on a bunch of beliefs people hold to be true with no justification. Which ironically is what idiot atheists accuse Christians of doing. Rights are their "sky daddy" basically.
The purpose was to showcase we all have believes based on faith, regardless of being secular or religious. What's important is how are those believes justified and I'm arguing that atheists can't justify any of it in their worldview.
Human rights were defined after the stormfaggots got their assholes cratered by American bombs. They weren't defined before because nobody could imagine a government as retarded as theirs.
"Invincible ignorance," on display!
(With apologies to the original intent of the phrase)
Well, if they were defined and written down by a bunch of people, they must be real and objectively true then. Unlike God of the Bible which was also written by a bunch of people who defined Him. Case closed.