My point was that rights is a legal term and don't have ontological existence (aren't found in reality). They are social constructs that are based on a bunch of beliefs people hold to be true with no justification. Which ironically is what idiot atheists accuse Christians of doing. Rights are their "sky daddy" basically.
The purpose was to showcase we all have believes based on faith, regardless of being secular or religious. What's important is how are those believes justified and I'm arguing that atheists can't justify any of it in their worldview.
Human rights were defined after the stormfaggots got their assholes cratered by American bombs. They weren't defined before because nobody could imagine a government as retarded as theirs.
Well, if they were defined and written down by a bunch of people, they must be real and objectively true then. Unlike God of the Bible which was also written by a bunch of people who defined Him. Case closed.
That's a tu quoque. I grant you that Christianity is false - how does that help your case?
You believe in fairy tales, dude. A bunch of wigged men with leggings got together and crafted your holy book of rights that they pulled out of thin air. Why do we even have rights if we're a product of a blind deterministic meaningless process of atoms bumping into each other in a vast chaotic universe? Where do you get value from?
Oh wait, you believe in rights? Where are they? Can I touch and smell them? Do they exist or are they made up like sky daddy is?
Downvoted because of no right to make such a comment.
My point was that rights is a legal term and don't have ontological existence (aren't found in reality). They are social constructs that are based on a bunch of beliefs people hold to be true with no justification. Which ironically is what idiot atheists accuse Christians of doing. Rights are their "sky daddy" basically.
The purpose was to showcase we all have believes based on faith, regardless of being secular or religious. What's important is how are those believes justified and I'm arguing that atheists can't justify any of it in their worldview.
Human rights were defined after the stormfaggots got their assholes cratered by American bombs. They weren't defined before because nobody could imagine a government as retarded as theirs.
"Invincible ignorance," on display!
(With apologies to the original intent of the phrase)
Well, if they were defined and written down by a bunch of people, they must be real and objectively true then. Unlike God of the Bible which was also written by a bunch of people who defined Him. Case closed.
Your entire religion is based off believing a woman who got pregnant outside her marriage didn't have an affair.
I have no words for how stupid you are.
Even more stupid for you to speak about things that you obviously know nothing about.
That's a tu quoque. I grant you that Christianity is false - how does that help your case?
You believe in fairy tales, dude. A bunch of wigged men with leggings got together and crafted your holy book of rights that they pulled out of thin air. Why do we even have rights if we're a product of a blind deterministic meaningless process of atoms bumping into each other in a vast chaotic universe? Where do you get value from?