by pkvi
1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's for the judge and jury. For investigators, it's "potentially guilty until ruled out."

1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

They never were. Remember when banks used to freeze accounts of people who transferred funds into Bitcoin exchanges?

1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

One guy with a gun is not going to break anyone out of jail and then overthrow a government, and if you see a million guys with guns trying to do that, it's not a rebellion but a government sting operation.

6
SicilianOmega 6 points ago +6 / -0

The war was already lost 100 years ago. 50 years ago, the enemy already controlled all the institutions, and the few who noticed were branded as lunatics or assassinated.

2
SicilianOmega 2 points ago +2 / -0

The more relevant analogy would be telling someone to throw themselves down the stairs or you'll shoot them, versus pushing them down the stairs yourself. They're technically different, but not in any important way.

2
SicilianOmega 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've heard that ivermectin does the same thing to the spike protein that it does to the virus.

1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why Your Otherwise Smart Friends Think Stupid Things

By Clarice (((Feldman)))

...

The Anti-Semitism of the Squad

To those of us paying attention, the shift to anti-Semitism from a not insignificant part of the Democratic party is unmistakable. But, probably because they share that view, the publishers of the New York Times have gone to some pains to disguise this. This week, the effort by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, her squad, and their hangers-on to strip from the budget funds for Israel’s Iron Dome, a major defensive weapon against rocket attacks, went down in defeat. The Times carried a quote from her on the loss in their print edition, which they later removed from the online editions: "NYT Removes Line Saying AOC Changed Iron Dome Vote Because of “Influential Lobbyists and Rabbis." From the Jewish Journal:

by pkvi
2
SicilianOmega 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gee, I wonder why they're promoting HIV testing all of a sudden. I wonder how long it'll be before they reveal that the vax actually causes HIV infection.

by pkvi
4
SicilianOmega 4 points ago +4 / -0

And Elon controls it, not you. Once it's in your body, Elon will use it to control you. Those he brings back from paralysis will only be able to walk as long as they maintain their social credit scores. Others will see the tech used to fry their brains for disobedience or thought crime.

by payback
2
SicilianOmega 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's what I heard:

Man: I think that the average person can't tell the difference between George Clooney and Kurt Russell. It's obvious St. Patrick ...

Radio: Frantic Screaming

Man: ... Patrick ... meta.

Woman: I agree. We're going down this road together.

Man: Then it'll be....

Radio cuts in

Woman: She couldn't be ....

Radio cuts in again.

Woman: Let's get her statement. I'm not moving forward officially until Angela weighs in.

Man: If you're concerned with St. Patrick, and if anyone's here, Angela, we need a full Chinese Wall here. Sorry, one, ... and two, for all this action in China ...

Radio cuts in.

Woman: I get your point .... Angela wouldn't try to ... Patrick's

Woman 2 (talking over Woman): Who's the one that's yelling "FIRE FIRE FIRE?"

Others stop talking.

2
SicilianOmega 2 points ago +2 / -0

The other consideration is that I would personally rather have the entire economy fail and everybody starve to death, myself included, then live in a fucking shithole tyranny where we can be forced to take medicine.

Ironically, the elite plan is to get us all to die (whether it's from the vax or from starvation would not be important to them) so they can have the world to themselves.

1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't help but notice they're not advocating waiting until it becomes life threatening before seeking treatment.

1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fled? I don't think so. Reddit banned everyone. Only bots and NPCs are welcome.

2
SicilianOmega 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why is he speaking English if he's speaking to his own tribe?

1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe that legally, only a grand jury can charge someone with murder, let alone the other charges, which include genocide and crimes against humanity.

2
SicilianOmega 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not giving out my e-mail address, but here are some links:

Jan 29, 2020:

https://2017-2021.state.gov/evacuation-of-americans-from-wuhan-china/index.html

Summary: The State Department began chartering flights to evacuate hundreds of US citizens from Wuhan.

Here's another article from Feb 6 saying that the last of those flights would happen that week:

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/02/05/us/coronavirus-wuhan-last-chartered-flights/index.html

On February 18, the first of them were released from quarantine in MCAS Miramar, San Diego:

https://fox5sandiego.com/news/coronavirus/coronavirus-evacuees-released-from-quarantine-at-mcas-miramar/

6
SicilianOmega 6 points ago +6 / -0

I believe this is the Texas criminal complaint in question. It alleges not "accessory' to murder, but actual murder, and also crimes against humanity.

1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gee, I wonder why he doesn't use his last name.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›