3
SicSemperTyrannis2 3 points ago +3 / -0

You have no idea what you're saying. I'd expect there to be exceptions, I just haven't encountered any.

You were trying to say that Jesus condemned all Jews, because a few turned His Father's house into a den of thieves, exploiting - other Jews (which He did not remove from the Temple)

Then you tried changing the topic to your OCD (Ashkenazi / Kazaria) which didn't develop any overlap with any Jewish lineage for some 1,000 after Jesus lived.

You're an absolute train wreck on this topic, and all you ever do is demonstrate your utter ignorance. None of this stuff is difficult to understand.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Irrelevant to anything under discussion here. You keep demonstrating what a dumbass you are. Can you do anything else?

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nothing of the sort. You always pretend something's a one-off, when the fact is you've consistently been this stupid as long as you've operated this account.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everyone already knows you have the intellect of a child, and that you have no interest in learning anything.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You were talking about what you thought Jesus said, and immediately revert to this. Very telling ..

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not because they were Jews, no. Learn how to read. Learn how to stop lying.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh it's definitely slang! Bundle of sticks is one of the many ways the English bastardize the English language, lol. Aluminium? I've gone to A hospital (rarely) but I will NEVER "go to hospital" because I know how to speak English.

Just two examples ...

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jesus never whipped Jews because they were Jews. You're entirely wrong on this entire subject, and you also lie continually. Why must you do that?

4
SicSemperTyrannis2 4 points ago +4 / -0

All good. Please understand that "faggot," exactly as it's always been used on this platform, means exactly what it has for over 50 years, and it's very much a Biblical concept:

"Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be strong." (1 Cor 16:13)

These lying faggots tossing the word "Jew" around as though it were an insult are absolutely violating this Biblical precept. (As well as others)

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Two of the three stooges. Worse, at least one of you pretends to be a Christian. Jesus was born a Jew, lived as a Jew, died as a Jew, rose again as a Jesus, and lives forever interceding for us as our Great High Priest forever, a very Jewish thing.

You can't be a Christian and even think Jew = bad, which obviously has nothing to do with zionism. You're just empty headed idiots, never learning anything.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

RealWildRantee was doing his best to attack me, and the only way he can is by lying.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know full well he was lying, I would expect you not to attack me for someone else lying.

3
SicSemperTyrannis2 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is no "argument," just the overused notion that calling someone a jew is an insult.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

In other words, leftards change the meanings of words so quickly even they can't keep their bs straight, lol

Carry on :)

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you have to be a lying faggot?

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You shouldn't be using "natalist" as though it were somehow a derogatory term. Leave that for the retard here.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's an outdated definition. Now it means something completely different. What you're referring to changed to MPD (Multiple Personality Disorder) and then DID. (Dissociative Identity Disorder)

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fair, but that's not even close to "upstate NY." It's basically a NJ suburb.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not really countering his basic premise

3
SicSemperTyrannis2 3 points ago +3 / -0

disprove my points

No, fool, we just bounce your head off the floor and then stuff you in a locker.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

there is nothing we could realistically do

You've had enough soy for 3 lifetimes, apparently ...

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

But if they had failed in the elections, they wouldn't have been in the conversation to be given authority.

Huge difference between failing and won. Hitler never won.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never won nearly enough to do what he did, that's the furthest thing from a technicality imaginable. He begged for that authority, and was granted it. The very next day he began implementing his plans for war which he had made a decade prior, yet wehraboos here falsely claim "he never wanted war."

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›