If you are under forty, then you are still a wage slave, and of value to the corporations.
Using a steady stream of partial truths, they boiled the frog's brain.
This meme portrays the opposite of what Disney would. While failing to crop out homer in the first image without errors. Which could have been corrected by the use of other images from the original video.
Immediately upon starting to watch this video, he struck me as looking very similar to Howard Stark from the Marvel universe. At the 3 minute mark it details that the name on his birth certificate is "Marvel Whiteside Parsons". And his group was known as "The Suicide Squad"?
So, be like Gorge Floyd? That does sound like the currency system in prison after all. And he did know how to feed himself, and never paid for food.
This is true. As I was oversimplifying how fiat is used and controls the populace, and using the term 'digital' at face value. But the person I was talking to, doesn't know the difference between BTC and CBDC. And I've spent years getting into the nuance with him, and getting nowhere.
No. As I do not follow people. The most I will do is read through their post history.
Fiat currency is already a digital currency. It is controlled by the central banks. It is a currency based on reverse debt. Where they loan out money they never held. Then, upon repaying these debts from your work efforts, you create it's value. Ending with the banks inevitably holding all the currency you created.
Being able to hold paper tokens on the front end, doesn't negate what these things actually are, or represent.
Which current currencies do you support? And no, I will not accept Gold/silver as an answer, as I can not buy food with neither of those. I am going to insist on an answer.
Back when the internet was good, one of the surest ways to cause retention of a user base was to to inflict harsh rules, and frequent bans. In short to treat user like children. Or in a more modern parlance, increase """engagement""".
Do you even know what you are doing right now?
I didn't tell you what you do, or do not believe. I only pointed out to you how misdirection works in propaganda and controlled opposition.
Speaking of which' *poof *, like a lovers kiss or a fart in the breeze, the account is gone.
https://conspiracies.win/p/17sP6bPv1D/x/c/4Z8kfTCgiYy
Deleted by user, followed up by erasure by mod.
Your momma. She conspired with your dad to give birth to you.
I think he can put the gun away.
We do not need to hate a man to prosecute or hold him responsible. In fact, that is exactly how one should not judge. Recent trials come to mind to prove this point.
Though, all I have been thinking all morning is of how he was never held accountable, and of those who have replaced him.
Two days after the full moon. And I doubt Halloween rap music was playing at the time.
Everything in the scene is wrong.
-
They keep the robot in a box.
-
The robot's crate is new
-
The robot is old and warn
-
How did they move such a massive crate containing a heavy duty robot to it's location to the center of the clearing alongside the other boxes?
-
why did they not offload those boxes to their actual destination? They flew them there after all.
-
how did they move those boxes, when they only have fighting robots and not moving robots?
-
Were there moving robots not shown?
-
The box the robot is packed in is filled with cool air for some reason that rushes out.
-
They pick up a box for a robot to hand it to it, thus doing more work than the bot will do carrying the box
-
They are flying around with excess weight they need to off load
-
There aren't even enough boxes to warrant unpacking the bot
-
This excess weight includes one single fighting robot, out of an entire army that refuses to fight.
-
They carried the box containing the robot to that location, as apposed to simply having it walk to that location
-
There is no reason to have a garrison, or any of that gear at that location
-
Again, why is the bot in a box?
-
The few boxes that need to be moved were moved to that location, only to be moved to another
-
Zack constructed this scene to give the audience information, while simply not understanding the logistics of moving boxes efficiently, utilizing the robot in the scene.
It would be easier to list the number of scenes that make sense in this movie, as that list would be zero.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/rebel_moon_part_1_a_child_of_fire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzczijDtnFY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ATnBuOMOZY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-s4jYm9Mz4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDTOD94YRpY
Does that make it make more sense?
Do you read my text in an angry voice?
You have been told to think about the dish. Which is an easily discredited talking point as you can easily bounce ham radios signals off the moon.
This makes you feel superior and smart, while draws your attention away from the fact that there is a jeep on the moon.
How, why would any scientist do that?
-
If you are communicating with the module. You would just use a straight antenna.
-
If you were communicating with earth, a dish flopping about would also do no good.
-
There is a jeep on the moon? Why?
He probably came from the Great Awakening mod team. They like to stir the pot for some reason. Trying to fulfill their prophecies like a doomsday cult.
So you question the dish? But not why the dish exists, or why there is a jeep on the moon? Why would a jeep even have such a dish?
Oh, who am I kidding. All your posts are controlled opposition talking points, and you refuse to discuss them on your "PRO" account.
https://saidit.net/s/conspiracy/comments/cbyk/why_would_you_put_a_jeep_on_the_moon_what_is_the/
A day late, and a dollar short.
18 minutes of pure nonsense.