Simply Amazing. I stood in awe upon reading your statement.
- Provide false quote, placing words in other people's mouths.
- Claim there to be some sort of argument or debate taking place.
- Proclaim yourself the winner.
Pattern Recognition: ☈
"No one said this. Learn how to read."
What an odd thing to say to the statement; "And your comments are not well poisoning." A reply that constitutes an admission that you are here as a 'well poisoner'. Strange flex. But I shall take your word for that.
As well as save the link for later reference:
https://conspiracies.win/p/199O1f1y9j/x/c/4ZFB3Ho9WJc
You Dumb Ass.
"Reported for continued violations of the only rule on this board. Defend your blatant falsehoods or you revoke the right to whine when anyone calls them out, you filthy coward."
OH. O.K. Well I better do as you say then. Let's take a look at my claims so far:
"Candace Owen Will Be Remarking on This, This Coming Monday (10/07/24)"
I stand by that claim. Candice Owen will be remarking on the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 on Monday. You Retarded Fucking Spoon.
"well poisoning hoaxes"
Of course, I'm detracting from your valuable threads.
And your comments are not well poisoning. And then you go on to tell me not to reply in my own thread. I could write a thesis on this one comment reply alone.
Thing about Monday is. Today is Sunday.
https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1fwyi8e/pay_close_attention_to_what_happens_to_her_next/
And for some reason started posted minutes apart from u/TallestSkil in a thread that has been idle for 9 hours. A person who also has no posts. This is getting pretty fucking retarded you guys.
That's not gold. He's pissing on you.
I didn't Question the video. I Questioned you.
Why would anyone believe you?
He should stop changing personas depending on the sub. And you need to post content, so that we can pin down your values, and more easily trust you.
Yes, everyone is just clambering for Milk and Pepsi, now that all 13 of you have seen this. Just after I bought stock in Pepsi and big utter. I can't believe you've unveiled my master plan.
Another thread successfully derailed! Congratulations deep state operative! No, I don't care what coloured hat you wear, as your brains are made of feces, brimming with e-coli.
You seems knowledgeable on this topic. Can you elaborate further?
And the streaking effect from the tips of the spires?
I don't think your speculation makes sense. There is a streaking effect away from the buildings. This could be a washing effect, before a second exposure is made from the first.
The Nature of Implication
Logical Structure: The structure of an implication can be represented as:
If P (antecedent), then Q (consequent).
This means that whenever P is true, Q must also be true.
However, if P is false, Q can either be true or false without affecting the truth of the implication.
Truth Values: The truth table for implications shows that the only time an implication is false is when P is true and Q is false. Thus:
True → True = True
True → False = False
False → True = True
False → False = True
Conflict Within Implication
The conflict within implication arises from several factors:
Ambiguity in Antecedents: The antecedent may not always clearly define the conditions under which the consequent holds. For example, “If it rains, then the ground will be wet” assumes that rain is the only factor affecting ground wetness, which may not always be true.
Overgeneralization: Implications can lead to overgeneralizations where specific cases are treated as universally applicable. For instance, saying “All birds can fly” implies that if something is a bird (P), it must fly (Q). However, this ignores exceptions like ostriches or penguins.
Contextual Factors: The context in which implications are made can alter their validity. A statement might hold true in one scenario but fail in another due to different influencing factors.
Reactions and Consequences: When considering actions and their reactions (as suggested by “ATION”), implications often involve predicting outcomes based on certain actions. Here lies a conflict because human behavior and reactions are unpredictable; thus, even well-structured implications may not yield expected results.
What Does ATION Implicate?
The suffix “-ation” typically indicates a process or action related to a verb. In this context:
It implicates reactions or consequences stemming from actions.
For example:
“Creation” implies bringing something into existence.
“Reaction” implies responding to an action or stimulus.
This highlights how actions lead to various outcomes or reactions—further complicating the straightforward nature of logical implications. Conclusion
In summary, conflicts within implication arise from ambiguities in antecedents, overgeneralizations about universality, contextual variations affecting truth values, and unpredictable human reactions to actions implied by “-ation.” Understanding these nuances helps clarify how implications function logically while recognizing their limitations in real-world applications.
Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
A comprehensive resource providing detailed entries on various philosophical topics including logic and implications.
Cambridge Dictionary
Offers clear definitions and explanations of terms related to logic and reasoning which help clarify concepts like implication and its components.
Introduction to Logic by Irving M. Copi
A foundational text on logical reasoning that discusses implications extensively along with their structures and conflicts in detail.
"Perceivable implies same; perception implies different; suggestion implies alike."
No dummy. You are doing that. You are implying things. O.K, tard tard?
That is a definition of a word. I however asked you WHICH system you are referring to.
First tell us which system you are referring too, and then prepare for a few dozen follow up Questions.
So, all four planes disappeared after impact, but this is fake. Got it.
Have you tried... Not being gay? ☳‽‽‽
"You have no idea what truth even is."
Do you mean like this u/TallestSkil?
Even though I linked you to a direct image comparison?
A half blind man can see that they are the same angel.
https://scored.co/c/conspiracies/ban-logs
Care to chime in u/clemaneuverers?