4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

Provide data on stockpiles and resources required to maintain them.

On a dead internet? Where search engines obscure results? Even less likely then launching a Minuteman III.

It takes hundreds of people, days of coordination and millions of dollars of resources to prep and launch a single rocket. One does not need details to understand that you can not mothball a rocket for 50 years and launch it in under ten minutes by turning a pair of keys.

There are less than ten videos of this thing actually being fired on youtube.

You want proof? How have they been performing maintenance on these things for 50 years without knowing how to perform maintenance on them?

You can't even park a car for more than a month without worrying about start up issues. This is a rocket, meant for intercontinental space flight, with nuclear ordinance.

The shelf life of a "missile system", and not just the individual missiles is 8 to 22 years. Reminder; this is not a missile. It is a rocket being called a missile for some reason.

5
Questionable 5 points ago +5 / -0

Do you think rockets ready to launch on a moments notice can sit in silos for 50 years without maintenance? They go into orbit. Just like those that put satellites in orbit. With similar sized payloads. It takes days of planning to just put up one payload. Yet we can sends thousands of them on a moments notice with the turn of a key? Even as a child in the 70's, this never made sense to me.

We can do this, several thousand times, in a ten minute window, with no crew, or pre-flight buildup.

Does that sound even remotely believable?

Earlier Thread

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you think rockets ready to launch on a moments notice can sit in silos for 50 years without maintenance? They go into orbit. Just like those that put satellites in orbit. With similar sized payloads. It takes days of planning to just put up one payload. Yet we can sends thousands of them on a moments notice with the turn of a key? Even as a child in the 70's, this never made sense to me.

We can do this, seven thousand times, in a ten minute window, with no crew, or pre-flight buildup.

Does that sound even remotely believable?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gluton= lectin=poison.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI1ve5IWoT8

Your immune system attacks these proteins. If your body adopts these proteins, your immune system attacks itself.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is enough fissionable nuclear material for 70k nuclear bombs seemingly impossible you ask?

I have a better Question; where did it all go once they were decommissioned?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Potatoes are nightshade plants. Still better for you than wheat when cooked. The temperature to denature Gluton is so high you need to burn it to carbon to destroy the harmful proteins.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because the claimed numbers have always been too high. How long did it take them to make just 2 bombs for the end of world war 2? And then suddenly we have enough plutonium for thousands? Just as impossible as traveling through the van allen belt.

A cold war only needs an appearance of strength, not to actually be strong.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. I know. The fact that he gives rapists and murderers "A second chance" pisses me off to no end. Most of us have never gotten a fair first chance.

https://conspiracies.win/p/15JTp8yayU/hey-killer-how-about-i-get-a-fir/c/

These people are the opposite of what they claim.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is in addition to the lectins. Don't eat wheat, whole wheat or whole grains. Dave's killer bread really will kill you.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could be something, or it could be nothing. Honestly, it might just be hysteria. It may seem like overkill for a fight at a mall, but then again, if you want to prevent a riot, this is how it's done.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

The information slowly builds up to a point in the video. It's best not to skip around while watching it, and watch it from start to finish.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your first point makes sense. But daylight being the same among time zones has no real math behind it, and the daylight per zone would only be relatively similar either way.

The way I see it, it's as though the orbit is on a higher orbital plane. Which makes sense if we are on a habitable zone of a massive stationary planetoid, rotating only once per year. Which also explains how the nights sky is only one view. As we are always looking up at the same sky and never in distinct directions during the seasons. This fits in with crater earth theory.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/QetnEQ2pszMr/

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I feel the same way about the Iraqi Dinar. Doesn't make it true.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are around 14,000 claimed cryptocurrencies. Only around 20 Proof of Work coins are of any value.

They are listed from top to bottom here:

https://www.coinlore.com/mineable-coins

This is not hard to understand.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›