"One country. How many countries are there in the world?"
Yes, I have given an example of one country where it is illegal. Where as many local laws, do not portray on a national scale. This doesn't not change the context of my original statement, of illegal or taboo. As nobody outside of China is allowed to use it anymore.
Me stating facts, does not make me wrong. It proves that I knew what I was talking about. These are things I knew inherently, and without doing research as you instructed of me. IE: Common Knowledge.
Agh... I see it now. I used the wrong "You're".
Either you are being an English Nazi, or something was lost in translation.
"Classical liberalism has a place in this Country; at the heart of its founding you could even say. Do you think the D party retains any of that?"
Judging by the inaction of both parties when in the majority, contrasted by the swift and poignant actions of Trump, when needed, along with true Democrats such as Tulsi Gabbard resigning... I can safely say, the system is completely corrupt, and that no actual political representatives exist, or are allowed to take actions.
The only ideals either party holds, are held by their followers. Which are used against them.
"Rs haven't conserved anything, so the 'conservative' moniker needs to go away."
This is a Question I used to ask people all the time. If they are conservatives, what is it that they are conserving?
It was many years before I finally met a down south environmentalist who claimed to be a conservationist and a Republican. She spoke of the national forests and wet lands. Quiet a rare breed in deed, finding an actual conservative in the the conservative party. One who took the meaning of her chosen words seriously.
They are supported by corporations to foster division. Such as the division of man versus woman. Can you imagine convincing a rational adult male to go against their spouse? That's just crazy that any rational man would fall for such. Because men are smart. Am I right fam?
"Democrats would never win again"
Again, ignoring voter fraud, pretending that the DNC are actual Democrats, ignoring the RINOs, and assuming psyops aren't used on men.
Speaking of which. Nice thread.
"Literally every single shitty political movement is primarily supported by women"
As vague and meaningless as reading tea leaves or my horoscope. Makes it so the data can mean anything I wish, as long as I believe. Womp, womp...
You can equally take lesson from sitting quietly in an empty room.
" If you are correct and he is an actor then he played his part perfectly for the DS."
Was this meant for me? I implied no such thing.
"Thanks for the info. There wasn't a "next question" as I was contemplating your assertion that Trump is an actor."
No.. I have no idea where you are getting that from.
Oh wait.. Was it from here?
"And to answer your next Question in advance. I know."
What I know is that I linked you to a locked page. Which should lead you to Question If I realize such. Yes... Yes "I know" Look, I'm not actually a mind reader. Only connect the information that is provided. Doing otherwise is no better than writing fiction for Forbes.
He asked about legitimate democrats, not for far left extremists or, the mentally ill. You're conclusion is also false, as that echo chamers are based on lack of critical thinking, and not, lack of fools.
"Bullshit. You really have no idea what you are taking about."
The swastika is illegal in Germany.
https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-confusing-rules-on-swastikas-and-nazi-symbols/a-45063547
How are you so daft at knowing things you claim to know so much about?
"No it is not. There is an article about it. Have you bothered to check?"
And when I say "This is ridiculous." There is a follow up sentence after it which makes it clear that I am referring to you, and your lack of basic English skills.
"This is ridiculous. You are literally seething with rage over the assumptions, you yourself have come to. Because you apparently don't know what the word common means."
How do you function? Do you even read the comments you reply to?
"No I am not point."
??
"Do you want to rephrase the Question?"
Oh, no... That answers everything. You are not point. I get it now. Waiter! Check please!
Every disease that is caused by a virus, has a non viral variant of it.
Because of this, everything you've known, will soon be in Question. You will find yourself in a new reality sliding into chaos. Enjoy the show!
"And this is not really up for dispute anymore, "
I um... I dispute that as Questionable. And in doing so, disprove your statement. And as evidence, I shall offer up this proof. ?
That was literally just information for your benefit.
This is what it looks like when you have struck a nerve.
And to answer your next Question in advance. I know.
Hi. Yes, I am here.
"He was impeached anyway."
No, he was tried twice, and acquitted twice. Sir, that is not what it means to be impeached. That is what it means to be acquitted.
" Love your other stuff "
My name literally tells you to Question everything I post. Not for you to love it. My name is not LikeSubscribe&HitThatBellBro!
" the patriots cult"
Name calling is the lowest tier of the pyramid of debate. It it used to dismiss others without thought.
Right. You don't give a fuck that a man died of a lethal dose of Chinese fentanyl, that was 3 times higher than any human has ever survived, because it doesn't fit your narrative. The CCP is exporting this drug into America, to kill Americans.
"Kiss the boot that fucking stomps on you more, you dumb cunt."
I don't serve the Chinese government that helped George Floyd in killing himself, you do.
"I don't give a fuck if he died of an overdose."
Again you state openly how little you care. In so disregarding all logic, and absolving yourself of both critical thought, consistency and agency of your own character. You are literately telling everyone who reads your comments, that facts don't matter, you do not care.
K. Now that I have identified who the person you are replying to is. You're point?
"Just because you are too ignorant to know about it or because your school was shit does not mean, others don't."
You don't seem to understand your own words. "Common knowledge" is knowledge that is common. The swastika is illegal and or taboo in most countries.
"Have you even tried researching this on your own?"
I know what the swastika is. That neither makes it common, nor does it validate your assumption that I didn't know these facts.
Speaking of facts. The thoughts that occur in your mind, are not facts. Now stop making assumptions of what I do and do not know.
"There is literally a fucking wikipedia article about it."
This is ridiculous. You are literally seething with rage over the assumptions, you yourself have come to. Because you apparently don't know what the word common means.
Oh, is that what caused systemic voter fraud?
Didn't the league of women's voters keep the presidential debates honest before that roll was striped from them?
Aren't you falling for, and hence fostering division by pushing this stereotype?
George Floyd died of a self inflicted overdose.
"Don't care."
You should try it some time. Because if you don't care, you're words can not be trusted, since as you've stated, YOU DON"T CARE.
Maybe you should read that again. Because he didn't say anything. His statement was feel good nonsense, with a call to action, without a legitimate target.
The State Prosecution doctored evidence, and George Floyd died of an overdose... WHICH IS THE TOPIC OF THIS THREAD!
"I hope that every single police officer who breaks his Oath and does not protect the Constitutional rights of the Plebs is thrown into prison."
May I remind everyone here, the officer is the defendant in this case.
Right. To make themselves look like bufoons? Keep up the lie or don't, it's all rather transparent.
"This is common knowledge"
This is not common knowledge, it is not taught in schools. It has been occulted, and branded as evil.
Name one person that anyone would listen to if they went against germ theory. He would have been impeached had he gone against vaccines.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/B1OuvLzH6P5i/
At which point, states would not be opening up.
OH yes, modern environmentalism is just a ponzi scheme, and global money laundering, which both supports international trade, and uses it as an excuse to rob people of their money.
When Fluorocarbons were banned back in the late 70's it was swift and absolute. Similar to the outlawing of Quaaludes. Actual governing doesn't lose itself in nuance, their actions are swift and transparent.
Forced out really. The Democratic party, and the main stream media isn't going to tell you about anything that makes them look bad. They won't give you the Nǝ̵̺̓ws, only local tragedies, dressed up as talking points.