How are you so daft at knowing things you claim to know so much about?
"No it is not. There is an article about it. Have you bothered to check?"
And when I say "This is ridiculous." There is a follow up sentence after it which makes it clear that I am referring to you, and your lack of basic English skills.
"This is ridiculous. You are literally seething with rage over the assumptions, you yourself have come to. Because you apparently don't know what the word common means."
How do you function? Do you even read the comments you reply to?
"One country. How many countries are there in the world?"
Yes, I have given an example of one country where it is illegal. Where as many local laws, do not portray on a national scale. This doesn't not change the context of my original statement, of illegal or taboo. As nobody outside of China is allowed to use it anymore.
Me stating facts, does not make me wrong. It proves that I knew what I was talking about. These are things I knew inherently, and without doing research as you instructed of me. IE: Common Knowledge.
Wasn't your last complaint that I only gave one example? Again, the debate is over, what is Common Knowledge. And nobody outside of China is allowed to use the swastika anymore. This is our current reality, and no amount of word play will change this.
The swastika is illegal in Germany.
https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-confusing-rules-on-swastikas-and-nazi-symbols/a-45063547
How are you so daft at knowing things you claim to know so much about?
And when I say "This is ridiculous." There is a follow up sentence after it which makes it clear that I am referring to you, and your lack of basic English skills.
How do you function? Do you even read the comments you reply to?
One country. How many countries are there in the world?
Yes, I have given an example of one country where it is illegal. Where as many local laws, do not portray on a national scale. This doesn't not change the context of my original statement, of illegal or taboo. As nobody outside of China is allowed to use it anymore.
Me stating facts, does not make me wrong. It proves that I knew what I was talking about. These are things I knew inherently, and without doing research as you instructed of me. IE: Common Knowledge.
Here is the original claim:
It is still bullshit and giving ONE example does not change that.
Wasn't your last complaint that I only gave one example? Again, the debate is over, what is Common Knowledge. And nobody outside of China is allowed to use the swastika anymore. This is our current reality, and no amount of word play will change this.