I notice how you didn't address my comment, in spite of it being here first. Of course you didn't. As your blanket dismissal doesn't work against it, does it?
Clearly there are only 2 types of people in the world. Those who categorize things into 2 categories, and the other 4 billion people on the planet that are not that simple.
I personally look at it as being an 80/20 split between terrain theory and germ theory, and that neither theory is 100% correct.
Now how does this line up with fires and pandemics?
ππ«π°π΄π’π― πΆπ¬π²π― π«π¬π±π¦π£π¦π ππ±π¦π¬π«π°.
The corporation of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has gone bankrupt. That is what changed.γ €
Whichever form of governance you adhere to, the fractional banking system subverts it as well. It distorts all that you believe and understand. Fiat money is reverse debt that leaves you doing all the work, and giving away your profits. It corrupts every aspect of your life. There are no exceptions.
Closing one's eyes to a threat only blinds yourself.
Still not necessary,.
The video I called out as fake was similar to this one. Only the sun was traveling in a circle at the horizon without accounting for axial tilt.γ €
the topic is; 'Why does the most accurate spelling show the least correct answer'. What don't you understand about that? I mean, you seemed to have already answered the Question for me. Yet you keep harping on about the example Question.
"Thus, there is nowhere on Earth where the sun can travel perfectly parallel to the Earthβs surface in a continuous loop."
"In conclusion, there is no location on Earth where sunlight can travel perfectly parallel to its surface in a continuous loop due to Earthβs curvature and axial tilt."
You:
"there is nowhere on Earth where the sun can travel perfectly parallel to the Earthβs surface in a continuous loop. What don't you get?"
???
Nothing. That makes perfect sense. As I have already stated 5 hours ago.
Try keeping up. I am slow and dumb after all.'
Amazing. It took you 6 hours, but you figured it out.
Now neither Question results in explicitly mentioning the degree of tilt.
Which is a notable improvement over your belief that I can click on images I edited into a clearly pieced together comparison. Though you really do need to work on addressing the topic, and not whatever preconeived notions you seem so hung up on.
I will try and do better spell checking in spite of my impending blindness.
Awesome. Now do they, or anyone, have any images of Earth from Moon orbit?
Right. So the box that I added, showing that the correct information is only shown while asking a Question with a miss-spelling proves that I have a low IQ. Amazing.
From your response, I can assume that we both agree that a video showing the sun traveling parallel to the horizon is impossible.
Now that, that is out of the way. Do you care to speculate on why simple information is being hidden from people that use correct spelling?
The red underline that I added in photo edit is telling me that my grammar sucks? What does the second red underline mean, or how about the red box?
In the above example; Artificial Intelligence chooses to give you the wrong answer for spelling words correctly.
Amazing. Let's pretend that you care what the original argument was over:
As he had clearly posted a fake video supporting his theory, In which the sun was shown traveling in a loop that was paralel to the Earth's surface. But I'm the retard here.
Note: The A.I seems to only mention the Axial tilt if I misspell the word "parallel" as "paralel".
Fun fact: I am in no way associated with the Q movement, and u/catsfive banned me from his site for an argument I had here with u/clemaneuverers in HIS flat Earth thread.
"Indeed I did, you just have little memory."
I don't need a good memory. I have a text log of our conversation.
"That's ok, fraud is cool."
Strange admission. But, I have no choice other than to allow it.
In the future. Do better. As for my charade, I shall now stop perpetrating 'the charade' for which I am accused of. It ends now. Done.
You didn't ask for me to explain myself, you told me to 'give up the charade'. Explanation: What I am currently doing, is trying to get you to tell me what 'charade' I am perpetrating. Upon receiving this explanation, I will most dutifully 'give it up', dude.
O.K. And what 'charade' am I perpetrating? Be specific, or else I might think you are not capable of explaining yourself. AKA: mistake you for a retard.
Now I feel silly. I thought I had refreshed the page for some reason. You posted 1 minute 38 seconds before me in a thread that had sat idle for 3 hours.