1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

You do understand that both time and history exists don't you?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I bet it smells.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

The appears to predate the movie by 17 years and comic book by 1.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

What the fuck is that thing on the left?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. Did you read it?

Yes. I read the word "It's" which apparently was your answer to 5 different Questions asked of you. I'm sorry that you are not a smart man.

Romania's gold and Russia isn't giving it back.

Ownership of gold, from a defunct government that hasn't existed in over 80 years since a coupe during a world War? OK. Sure. But WHO in Romania? And who in Russia has it now? And why did Russia occupy Romania after the war? And what was in the documents seized by the Russian government?

Why are you simping for Russia and pedos?

I'm not. I am just trying to inform you of the objective facts, through Questions, on the topics of which you have Questions on.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's literally in the article.

OH.. OK. """"IT!"""" Got it.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude. Nobody fucking gets you man. There is no context that makes that make sense.

You can, because you know what I mean, in context.

No. I fucking don''t!

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Project. somewhere. else. please.

So your reply to me accusing you of projecting(formulating a reply that sounds like it came from you), is claiming that I was projecting? Sure why not?

you know literally nothing whatsoever about me.

I know that you curse people out, me included claiming that we are all Jewish shills without provocation. And that it's your default mode.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nothing is happening anywhere

I can't believe you actually typed that.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. But that actually sounds like you. And I wouldn't bother telling you anything as you don't listen to information that originates from outside your own mind. Because you already know everything! In fact, I wouldn't even bother to compliment you when earned, as you would simply take it as an insult and answer in kind with vitriol and self gratifying hubris. As you are a fucking useless dick. One so self involved that you are incapable of helping anyone who needs it, as all you can do is insult others.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right. You've ignored every Question I asked you, so sure, that makes me retarded.

So lets go on asking Questions you won't answer. What documents were taken and not returned? Who's gold was it? Is the gold suddenly more important than the treasure that was returned? How does King Michael's Coup factor into all this? And the Soviet occupation of Romania at the end of World War Ii that lasted until 1954?

3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

You miss your last booster son? Isn't it about time you were "up to date"?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right. And you don't know who, why or where. But that makes all Russians thieves in your book, despite that former country no longer existing and most people alive today, not having been born. According to you.

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

Actually it's a 20 year slow burn. Nice of you to go along with a larp though. Does it make you feel important to notice that this information is wrong? While simultaneously ignoring everything, everywhere, happening all at once?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

OH, I'm sorry. Does that wiki page contradict itself?

How about you instruct me on which inconsistencies I am to ignore, and then I will go along with your title of "nation of thieves", and then """reparations""" can be made, under the assumption that all behind the scenes banking negotiations are known, despite "Very little is known about the Treasure after the October Revolution"?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actual tl:dr:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_Treasure#The_Treasure_since_1917

Very little is known about the Treasure after the October Revolution, but it appears that during World War II all the valuables held by the Soviet state (and presumably of the Romanian state) were taken out from Moscow and sent toward the regions which were 'not endangered'. However, it is clear that they were not kept sealed, as the agreement with the Romanian government said, as the chests of the archives which were returned in 1935 had obviously been rummaged through and many objects and documents were missing.

And from that, you get a title of "nation of thieves"?

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Simply typing it doesn't make it true.

For example:

You are a good and honest person.

See? That's not true is it?

3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

I find it amazing how that you think simply saying things make them facts.

Or how that your account suddenly woke up after 2 years of silence during the pandemic.

5
Questionable 5 points ago +5 / -0

Who?

The bill—which already passed the Republican-controlled Wyoming House of Representatives on a 36-25 vote late last month—proposes banning state residents from marrying anyone under the age of 16

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Similar" is a rather vague term, don't you think? And the future is not something to makes promises on lightly. Now I can't speak for u/clemaneuverers , but I can say that I personally found the title objectionable. Namely your need for us to use our imaginations to visualize rape scenarios of young boys, with no clear motives or actual evidence, in an attempt to disparage someone you clearly do not like.

With that in mind. I highly discourage anyone from making any promises to the likes of you. As you do not seem to have very high ethical standards. After all, you are the one that wrote that title, and seem to have no problem doing so in the first place.

What even motivates this Question:

So, are you going to object to all similar titles in the future?

Do tell us. Please.

8
Questionable 8 points ago +8 / -0

So you don't see any problem with believing this poorly made cartoon do you? Can you see how this comic is a control mechanism in it's own, similar to the one being portrayed within it?

This is how to dismiss discourse. Similar to how you are discouraged from talking about white separatists, but only to talk about white supremacists. It's what actual controlled opposition really looks like.

Crater Earth. Fake Moon landings. Saturn Cube. Tartaria. Lost history of the Ages. What do they all have in common? They all touch back on this concept.

Lets say flat earth is dumb. Alright, but it shares many concepts with things that are not. And if you outright discredited it, it harms these other theories as well by association.

Really look at that comic! You now believe a comic, more than you do rational arguments. You label things, in order to more easily discredit them without thinking about them.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›